Suppr超能文献

阐明生命末期关怀的价值观和偏好:新的非专业人员劳动力的作用。

Clarifying Values and Preferences for Care Near the End of Life: The Role of a New Lay Workforce.

机构信息

Regenstrief Institute, Inc., 1101 West Tenth Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46202-4800, USA.

Department of Medicine, IU School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

出版信息

J Community Health. 2017 Oct;42(5):926-934. doi: 10.1007/s10900-017-0336-5.

Abstract

Community health workers (CHWs) can engage elderly persons in advance care planning (ACP) conversations. We report how trained CHWs used Go Wish cards (GW cards) to identify patients' highest priority preferences and evaluated whether engaging in ACP conversations was associated with subsequent health care utilization. A one-year long, pre-post longitudinal design was used to evaluate our educational intervention using mixed-methods. 392 patients (mean of 73.3 years, 82% women, 48% African American, 43% Caucasian) enrolled in the Aging Brain Care (ABC) program and participated in ACP discussions with CHWs. We expanded the role of the ABC's CHW, who work directly with individuals and caregivers during home visits to monitor bio-psycho-social needs, to include ACP conversations. The CHWs received ACP training, practice with tools such as GW cards, and support from an electronic health record (EHR) clinical decision support tool. Quantitative measures of patients' ACP preferences and health care utilization were abstracted from the EHR. Qualitative data about patients' perceptions of CHWs in facilitating ACP discussions was obtained through semi-structured interviews. Eighty-six patients' data indicated that they had engaged in a preferences-for-care process using GW cards. The top-three card choices by patients was attending to spirituality and religious concerns, preparing for end of life, and maintaining personal wholeness. CHWs were able to effectively engage in ACP conversations with patients and GW cards were a positive way to stimulate discussion of issues previously undiscussed.

摘要

社区卫生工作者(CHWs)可以让老年人参与预先护理计划(ACP)对话。我们报告了经过培训的 CHWs 如何使用 Go Wish 卡(GW 卡)来确定患者的最高优先级偏好,并评估参与 ACP 对话是否与随后的医疗保健利用有关。采用为期一年的前后纵向设计,使用混合方法评估我们的教育干预措施。392 名患者(平均年龄为 73.3 岁,82%为女性,48%为非裔美国人,43%为白种人)参加了衰老大脑护理(ABC)计划,并与 CHWs 进行了 ACP 讨论。我们扩大了 ABC 的 CHW 的角色,他们在家庭访问期间直接与个人和照顾者合作,以监测生物心理社会需求,包括 ACP 对话。CHWs 接受了 ACP 培训,使用 GW 卡等工具进行了实践,并得到了电子健康记录(EHR)临床决策支持工具的支持。从 EHR 中提取了患者 ACP 偏好和医疗保健利用的定量措施。通过半结构化访谈获得了关于患者对 CHWs 促进 ACP 讨论的看法的定性数据。有 86 名患者的数据表明,他们已经使用 GW 卡参与了偏好护理过程。患者选择最多的三张卡片是关注精神和宗教关怀、为生命末期做准备以及保持个人完整。CHWs 能够有效地与患者进行 ACP 对话,GW 卡是激发对以前未讨论过的问题的讨论的一种积极方式。

相似文献

1
Clarifying Values and Preferences for Care Near the End of Life: The Role of a New Lay Workforce.
J Community Health. 2017 Oct;42(5):926-934. doi: 10.1007/s10900-017-0336-5.
3
Advance Care Planning With Black Women with Breast Cancer: A Community Health Worker Model.
Cancer Control. 2023 Jan-Dec;30:10732748231162479. doi: 10.1177/10732748231162479.
4
Implementation and Impact of Patient Lay Navigator-Led Advance Care Planning Conversations.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Apr;53(4):682-692. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.11.012. Epub 2017 Jan 3.
5
Challenges in providing end-of-life care consistent with documented patient preferences.
Ann Palliat Med. 2022 Dec;11(12):3610-3619. doi: 10.21037/apm-22-790. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
7
Death at home following a targeted advance-care planning process at home: the kitchen table discussion.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001 Jun;49(6):778-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2001.49155.x.
8
An Interview Study of Patient and Caregiver Perspectives on Advance Care Planning in ESRD.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Feb;71(2):216-224. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.07.021. Epub 2017 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Go Wish Card Game for Meaningful Conversations in the Oncology Healthcare Context: A Narrative Review.
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Feb 7;17(4):560. doi: 10.3390/cancers17040560.
2
Shared Decision-Making Tools Implemented in the Electronic Health Record: Scoping Review.
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 21;27:e59956. doi: 10.2196/59956.
3
A Review on the Application of Hospice Care in Patients with Advanced Cancer.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Dec 8;17:3219-3231. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S434509. eCollection 2023.
5
To Treat or Not to Treat? Dilemmas when Deciding on Antineoplastic Treatment in Patients With Far Advanced Cancers.
Cancer Control. 2023 Jan-Dec;30:10732748231176639. doi: 10.1177/10732748231176639.

本文引用的文献

2
3
From rhetoric to reality--community health workers in post-reform U.S. health care.
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 11;372(24):2277-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1502569.
5
New workforce development in dementia care: screening for "caring": preliminary data.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Jul;62(7):1364-8. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12886. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
7
Failure to engage hospitalized elderly patients and their families in advance care planning.
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 May 13;173(9):778-87. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.180.
8
Knowledge of and preference for advance care planning by adults with congenital heart disease.
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Jun 15;109(12):1797-800. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.02.027. Epub 2012 Mar 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验