• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过个人邀请提高宫颈癌筛查项目的参与率:立陶宛一家初级医疗保健中心的经验。

Increasing attendance in a cervical cancer screening programme by personal invitation: experience of a Lithuanian primary health care centre.

作者信息

Kurtinaitienė Rūta, Rimienė Jolita, Labanauskaitė Ingrida, Lipunova Nadežda, Smailytė Giedrė

机构信息

Vilnius University Hospital Santariškių Klinikos, Centre of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vilnius, Lithuania.

UAB Patologijos diagnostika, Vilnius, Lithuania.

出版信息

Acta Med Litu. 2016;23(3):180-184. doi: 10.6001/actamedica.v23i3.3383.

DOI:10.6001/actamedica.v23i3.3383
PMID:28356807
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5287991/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

High participation rates are an essential component of an effective screening programme and many approaches were introduced as being successful for enhancing compliance to screening guidelines. The aim of this study was to evaluate to which extent a personal invitation by mail increases the rate of attendance in a cervical cancer screening programme in a primary health care centre.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was carried out as a pilot project to gain insight into feasibility of applying a well-known compliance increasing measure in Lithuanian population. The study included a sample of women registered at the primary health care centre in Panevėžys who had not participated in the cervical cancer screening programme for six and more years. Personal registered invitation letters to attend the primary health care centre for a Pap smear were sent out to 1789 women by mail.

RESULTS

In total, 2195 women were tested during 2011 at the primary health care centre. 487 (22.2%) of them attended the screening programme after receiving a personal invitation letter. Response rate for attending screening after receiving a personal invitation letter was 27.3%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that personal invitation letters addressed to long-term non-attendees could markedly increase participation in cervical cancer screening in Lithuania.

摘要

背景

高参与率是有效筛查项目的重要组成部分,许多方法被认为能成功提高对筛查指南的依从性。本研究的目的是评估通过邮件进行个人邀请在多大程度上能提高初级卫生保健中心宫颈癌筛查项目的参与率。

材料与方法

本研究作为一个试点项目开展,以深入了解在立陶宛人群中应用一种知名的提高依从性措施的可行性。研究样本包括在帕涅韦日斯初级卫生保健中心登记的、六年及以上未参加宫颈癌筛查项目的女性。通过邮件向1789名女性发送了个人挂号邀请信,邀请她们前往初级卫生保健中心进行巴氏涂片检查。

结果

2011年,共有2195名女性在初级卫生保健中心接受了检测。其中487名(22.2%)在收到个人邀请信后参加了筛查项目。收到个人邀请信后参加筛查的回应率为27.3%。

结论

我们的研究表明,给长期未参加者发送个人邀请信可显著提高立陶宛宫颈癌筛查的参与率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fd4/5287991/f430ee3e091e/aml-23-180-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fd4/5287991/f430ee3e091e/aml-23-180-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7fd4/5287991/f430ee3e091e/aml-23-180-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Increasing attendance in a cervical cancer screening programme by personal invitation: experience of a Lithuanian primary health care centre.通过个人邀请提高宫颈癌筛查项目的参与率:立陶宛一家初级医疗保健中心的经验。
Acta Med Litu. 2016;23(3):180-184. doi: 10.6001/actamedica.v23i3.3383.
2
Organised Versus Opportunistic Cervical Cancer Screening in Urban and Rural Regions of Lithuania.立陶宛城乡有组织与机会性宫颈癌筛查比较。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Sep 6;55(9):570. doi: 10.3390/medicina55090570.
3
[Attendance rate in the Polish Cervical Cancer Screening Program in the years 2007-2009].[2007 - 2009年波兰宫颈癌筛查项目的参与率]
Ginekol Pol. 2010 Sep;81(9):655-63.
4
Encouraging attendance at a screening mammography programme: determinants of response to different recruitment strategies.鼓励参加乳腺钼靶筛查项目:对不同招募策略的反应决定因素
J Med Screen. 1994 Jul;1(3):144-9. doi: 10.1177/096914139400100303.
5
Participation in interventions and recommended follow-up for non-attendees in cervical cancer screening -taking the women's own preferred test method into account-A Swedish randomised controlled trial.参与干预措施和建议对宫颈癌筛查未参与者进行随访-考虑到女性自身首选的检测方法-一项瑞典随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 2;15(7):e0235202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235202. eCollection 2020.
6
The Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Cervical Cancer Screening Using a Systematic Invitation System in Lithuania.立陶宛使用系统邀请制进行宫颈癌筛查的成本效益分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 11;16(24):5035. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16245035.
7
[Women's social conditions and their participation in Cervical Cancer Population Screening Program in Poland].[波兰女性的社会状况及其参与宫颈癌人群筛查项目的情况]
Ginekol Pol. 2009 Nov;80(11):833-8.
8
Effect of an antepartum Pap smear on the coverage of a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based prospective study.产前巴氏涂片检查对宫颈癌筛查项目覆盖率的影响:一项基于人群的前瞻性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Jan 23;7:10. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-10.
9
Study protocol for the most effective recall method in a cervical cancer screening program in Klang, Malaysia.马来西亚巴生市宫颈癌筛查项目中最有效召回方法的研究方案。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(10):5867-70. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.10.5867.
10
Effect of Fee on Cervical Cancer Screening Attendance--ScreenFee, a Swedish Population-Based Randomised Trial.费用对宫颈癌筛查参与率的影响——瑞典基于人群的随机试验ScreenFee
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 17;11(3):e0150888. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150888. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
An overview of cervical cancer epidemiology and prevention in the Baltic States.波罗的海国家宫颈癌流行病学和预防概述。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Apr 7;23(1):660. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15524-y.
2
Cervical Cancer in the Baltic States: Can Intelligent and Personalized Cancer Screening Change the Situation?波罗的海国家的宫颈癌:智能和个性化癌症筛查能否改变现状?
Acta Med Litu. 2022;29(1):19-26. doi: 10.15388/Amed.2022.29.1.18. Epub 2022 Jun 29.
3
Organised Versus Opportunistic Cervical Cancer Screening in Urban and Rural Regions of Lithuania.

本文引用的文献

1
Reasons for non-attendance to cervical screening and preferences for HPV self-sampling in Dutch women.荷兰女性未参加宫颈筛查的原因及对人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)自我采样的偏好
Prev Med. 2014 Jul;64:108-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.04.011. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
2
Cervical cancer screening practices in central and eastern Europe in 2012.2012年中东欧地区的宫颈癌筛查实践
Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat. 2013;22(1):7-19.
3
Methods to increase participation in organised screening programs: a systematic review.提高参与组织性筛查计划的方法:系统综述。
立陶宛城乡有组织与机会性宫颈癌筛查比较。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Sep 6;55(9):570. doi: 10.3390/medicina55090570.
4
Cervical Cancer Screening Programs in Europe: The Transition Towards HPV Vaccination and Population-Based HPV Testing.欧洲的宫颈癌筛查项目:向 HPV 疫苗接种和基于人群的 HPV 检测的转变。
Viruses. 2018 Dec 19;10(12):729. doi: 10.3390/v10120729.
BMC Public Health. 2013 May 13;13:464. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-464.
4
How to increase uptake in oncologic screening: a systematic review of studies comparing population-based screening programs and spontaneous access.如何提高肿瘤筛查的参与度:基于人群的筛查计划与自发就诊比较的系统评价研究
Prev Med. 2012 Dec;55(6):587-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.10.007. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
5
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 May 11;2011(5):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub2.
6
Factors associated with non-attendance, opportunistic attendance and reminded attendance to cervical screening in an organized screening program: a cross-sectional study of 12,058 Norwegian women.与参加、偶然参加和经提醒后参加有组织筛查计划中的宫颈筛查相关的因素:12058 名挪威妇女的横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Apr 26;11:264. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-264.
7
Trends in cervical cancer incidence and mortality in the Baltic countries, Bulgaria and Romania.波罗的海国家、保加利亚和罗马尼亚的宫颈癌发病率和死亡率趋势。
Int J Cancer. 2011 Apr 15;128(8):1899-907. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25525.
8
Barriers to cervical cancer screening attendance in England: a population-based survey.英格兰地区宫颈癌筛查参与障碍的研究:一项基于人群的调查。
J Med Screen. 2009;16(4):199-204. doi: 10.1258/jms.2009.009073.
9
Socio-demographic characteristics of participation in the opportunistic German cervical cancer screening programme: results from the EPIC-Heidelberg cohort.参与德国机会性宫颈癌筛查项目的社会人口学特征:来自海德堡欧洲癌症与营养前瞻性研究(EPIC-Heidelberg)队列的结果
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2009 Apr;135(4):533-41. doi: 10.1007/s00432-008-0485-0. Epub 2008 Oct 8.
10
Reasons for non-attendance at cervical screening as reported by non-attendees in Sweden.瑞典未参加子宫颈癌筛查者报告的未参加原因。
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2008 Mar;29(1):23-31. doi: 10.1080/01674820701504619.