• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于定量相位成像和机器学习的前列腺癌自动 Gleason 分级。

Automatic Gleason grading of prostate cancer using quantitative phase imaging and machine learning.

机构信息

University of Illinois, Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Quantitative Light Imaging Laboratory, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, United States.

University of Illinois, Department of Pathology, Chicago, Illinois, United States.

出版信息

J Biomed Opt. 2017 Mar 1;22(3):36015. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.22.3.036015.

DOI:10.1117/1.JBO.22.3.036015
PMID:28358941
Abstract

We present an approach for automatic diagnosis of tissue biopsies. Our methodology consists of a quantitative phase imaging tissue scanner and machine learning algorithms to process these data. We illustrate the performance by automatic Gleason grading of prostate specimens. The imaging system operates on the principle of interferometry and, as a result, reports on the nanoscale architecture of the unlabeled specimen. We use these data to train a random forest classifier to learn textural behaviors of prostate samples and classify each pixel in the image into different classes. Automatic diagnosis results were computed from the segmented regions. By combining morphological features with quantitative information from the glands and stroma, logistic regression was used to discriminate regions with Gleason grade 3 versus grade 4 cancer in prostatectomy tissue. The overall accuracy of this classification derived from a receiver operating curve was 82%, which is in the range of human error when interobserver variability is considered. We anticipate that our approach will provide a clinically objective and quantitative metric for Gleason grading, allowing us to corroborate results across instruments and laboratories and feed the computer algorithms for improved accuracy.

摘要

我们提出了一种用于组织活检自动诊断的方法。我们的方法学包括定量相位成像组织扫描仪和机器学习算法,用于处理这些数据。我们通过自动对前列腺标本进行 Gleason 分级来说明该方法的性能。该成像系统基于干涉测量原理运行,因此可以报告未经标记的样本的纳米级结构。我们使用这些数据来训练随机森林分类器,以学习前列腺样本的纹理行为,并将图像中的每个像素分类到不同的类别中。自动诊断结果是从分割区域计算得出的。通过将形态特征与腺体和基质的定量信息相结合,逻辑回归用于区分前列腺切除术组织中 Gleason 分级 3 与 4 级癌症的区域。从接收器工作曲线得出的这种分类的总体准确性为 82%,考虑到观察者间变异性时,这处于人类误差的范围内。我们预计,我们的方法将为 Gleason 分级提供一种临床客观和定量的指标,使我们能够在仪器和实验室之间验证结果,并为提高准确性提供计算机算法。

相似文献

1
Automatic Gleason grading of prostate cancer using quantitative phase imaging and machine learning.基于定量相位成像和机器学习的前列腺癌自动 Gleason 分级。
J Biomed Opt. 2017 Mar 1;22(3):36015. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.22.3.036015.
2
Development of a Deep Learning Algorithm for the Histopathologic Diagnosis and Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer Biopsies: A Pilot Study.深度学习算法在前列腺癌活检组织病理诊断和 Gleason 分级中的应用:一项初步研究。
Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Mar;7(2):347-351. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.11.003. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
3
Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Evaluate Performance of a Classifier for Automatic Grading of Prostate Cancer From Digitized Histopathologic Images.比较人工智能技术评估分类器在从数字化组织病理学图像自动分级前列腺癌方面的性能。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e190442. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0442.
4
Automatic grading of prostate cancer in digitized histopathology images: Learning from multiple experts.基于多位专家的学习:数字化组织病理学图像中前列腺癌的自动分级。
Med Image Anal. 2018 Dec;50:167-180. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
5
Going deeper through the Gleason scoring scale: An automatic end-to-end system for histology prostate grading and cribriform pattern detection.深入探究格里森评分系统:一种用于组织学前列腺分级和筛状模式检测的自动端到端系统。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 Oct;195:105637. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105637. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
6
Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.当代前列腺癌的Gleason分级:结合对实施2014年国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)前列腺癌Gleason分级共识会议实际问题的讨论进行更新
Am J Surg Pathol. 2017 Apr;41(4):e1-e7. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000820.
7
Deep Learning-Based Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Histopathology Images-Role of Multiscale Decision Aggregation and Data Augmentation.基于深度学习的前列腺癌组织病理图像 Gleason 分级——多尺度决策聚合和数据增强的作用。
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2020 May;24(5):1413-1426. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2019.2944643. Epub 2019 Sep 30.
8
Clinical Proof-of-concept of a Novel Platform Utilizing Biopsy-derived Live Single Cells, Phenotypic Biomarkers, and Machine Learning Toward a Precision Risk Stratification Test for Prostate Cancer Grade Groups 1 and 2 (Gleason 3 + 3 and 3 + 4).利用活检来源的活单细胞、表型生物标志物和机器学习的新型平台对前列腺癌1级和2级组(Gleason 3+3和3+4)进行精准风险分层测试的临床概念验证
Urology. 2019 Feb;124:198-206. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.09.032. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
9
Histologic tissue components provide major cues for machine learning-based prostate cancer detection and grading on prostatectomy specimens.组织学组织成分是基于机器学习的前列腺癌检测和分级在前列腺切除标本中的主要线索。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 18;10(1):9911. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66849-2.
10
Automated gleason grading on prostate biopsy slides by statistical representations of homology profile.通过同源性图谱的统计表示对前列腺活检切片进行自动Gleason分级。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 Oct;194:105528. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105528. Epub 2020 May 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial intelligence in urolithiasis: a systematic review of utilization and effectiveness.人工智能在尿石症中的应用:利用和有效性的系统评价。
World J Urol. 2024 Oct 17;42(1):579. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05268-8.
2
Perspectives on label-free microscopy of heterogeneous and dynamic biological systems.关于异质和动态生物系统的无标记显微镜技术的展望。
J Biomed Opt. 2025 Dec;29(Suppl 2):S22702. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.29.S2.S22702. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
3
On the use of deep learning for phase recovery.关于深度学习在相位恢复中的应用。
Light Sci Appl. 2024 Jan 1;13(1):4. doi: 10.1038/s41377-023-01340-x.
4
Artificial intelligence-enabled quantitative phase imaging methods for life sciences.人工智能赋能的生命科学定量相位成像方法。
Nat Methods. 2023 Nov;20(11):1645-1660. doi: 10.1038/s41592-023-02041-4. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
5
Computational pathology in cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and prediction - present day and prospects.癌症诊断、预后和预测中的计算病理学 - 现状与展望。
J Pathol. 2023 Aug;260(5):551-563. doi: 10.1002/path.6163. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
6
An update on computational pathology tools for genitourinary pathology practice: A review paper from the Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS).泌尿生殖病理学实践中计算病理学工具的最新进展:泌尿生殖病理学会(GUPS)的一篇综述文章。
J Pathol Inform. 2022 Dec 30;14:100177. doi: 10.1016/j.jpi.2022.100177. eCollection 2023.
7
Long-term label-free assessments of individual bacteria using three-dimensional quantitative phase imaging and hydrogel-based immobilization.使用三维定量相衬成像和水凝胶固定化技术对单个细菌进行长期无标记评估。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 2;13(1):46. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-27158-y.
8
Prediction of disease progression indicators in prostate cancer patients receiving HDR-brachytherapy using Raman spectroscopy and semi-supervised learning: a pilot study.使用拉曼光谱和半监督学习预测接受 HDR 近距离治疗的前列腺癌患者的疾病进展指标:一项初步研究。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 6;12(1):15104. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19446-4.
9
Assessment of Physical Fitness and Health Status of Athletes Based on Intelligent Medical Treatment under Machine Learning.基于机器学习的智能医疗下运动员体能与健康状况评估。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Jul 30;2022:9687496. doi: 10.1155/2022/9687496. eCollection 2022.
10
Quantitative Phase Imaging: Recent Advances and Expanding Potential in Biomedicine.定量相位成像:生物医学中的最新进展和扩展潜力。
ACS Nano. 2022 Aug 23;16(8):11516-11544. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.1c11507. Epub 2022 Aug 2.