Suppr超能文献

成分关系和位置关系的整合启动

Integrative Priming of Compositional and Locative Relations.

作者信息

Jones Lara L, Wurm Lee H, Calcaterra Ryan D, Ofen Noa

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Wayne State University Detroit, MI, USA.

Department of Psychology, Wayne State UniversityDetroit, MI, USA; Institute of Gerontology, Wayne State UniversityDetroit, MI, USA.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 15;8:359. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00359. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

Integrative priming refers to the facilitated recognition of a target word () as a real word following a prime (). Prior integrative priming studies have used a wide variety of integrative relations including temporal (), topical (), locative (), and compositional () relations. Yet differences in the types of integrative relations may yield differences in the underlying explanatory processes of integrative priming. In this study, we compared the magnitude, time course, and three theoretically based correlates of integrative priming for compositional () and locative () pairs in a lexical decision task across four stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs; 50, 300, 800, and 1,600 ms). Based on the Complementary Role Activation theory, integrative ratings (the extent to which the prime and target can be combined into a meaningful phrase) were predicted to facilitate target RTs. Based on the Embodied Conceptual Combination (ECCo) theory, the local co-occurrence of the prime and target, and the ability to perceptually simulate (visually experience) the prime-target pair were tested as predictors. In comparison to unrelated pairs (), target RTs were faster for the compositional and locative pairs, though did not differ between these relations. In support of the Complementary Role Activation theory, integrative ratings predicted target RTs above and beyond our control variables. In support of the ECCo theory, co-occurrence emerged as an early predictor of target RTs, and visual experience ratings was a reliable predictor at the 300 ms SOA, though only for the compositional relations.

摘要

整合启动是指在启动刺激()之后,对目标词()作为真实词的识别得到促进。先前的整合启动研究使用了各种各样的整合关系,包括时间()、主题()、位置()和组合()关系。然而,整合关系类型的差异可能会导致整合启动潜在解释过程的差异。在本研究中,我们在词汇判断任务中,针对四种刺激呈现间隔(SOA;50、300、800和1600毫秒),比较了组合()和位置()对的整合启动的大小、时间进程以及基于三种理论的相关因素。基于互补角色激活理论,整合评分(启动刺激和目标词能够组合成有意义短语的程度)预计会促进目标词的反应时间。基于具身概念组合(ECCo)理论,启动刺激和目标词的局部共现以及对启动刺激 - 目标词对进行感知模拟(视觉体验)的能力被作为预测因素进行测试。与不相关对()相比,组合对和位置对的目标词反应时间更快,不过这两种关系之间没有差异。支持互补角色激活理论的是,整合评分在控制变量之外还能预测目标词反应时间。支持ECCo理论的是,共现成为目标词反应时间的早期预测因素,并且视觉体验评分在300毫秒SOA时是一个可靠的预测因素,不过仅适用于组合关系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee61/5350123/bc8dba2190bf/fpsyg-08-00359-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验