Suppr超能文献

对整合、主题和分类关系的词汇启动的不同影响。

Different influences on lexical priming for integrative, thematic, and taxonomic relations.

作者信息

Jones Lara L, Golonka Sabrina

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit MI, USA.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jul 11;6:205. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00205. eCollection 2012.

Abstract

Word pairs may be integrative (i.e., combination of two concepts into one meaningful entity; e.g., fruit-cake), thematically related (i.e., connected in time and place; e.g., party-cake), and/or taxonomically related (i.e., shared features and category co-members; e.g., muffin-cake). Using participant ratings and computational measures, we demonstrated distinct patterns across measures of similarity and co-occurrence, and familiarity for each relational construct in two different item sets. In a standard lexical decision task (LDT) with various delays between prime and target presentation (SOAs), target RTs and priming magnitudes were consistent across the three relations for both item sets. However, across the SOAs, there were distinct patterns among the three relations on some of the underlying measures influencing target word recognition (LSA, Google, and BEAGLE). These distinct patterns suggest different mechanisms of lexical priming and further demonstrate that integrative relations are distinct from thematic and taxonomic relations.

摘要

词对可能是整合性的(即,将两个概念组合成一个有意义的实体;例如,水果蛋糕)、主题相关的(即,在时间和地点上有联系;例如,派对-蛋糕),和/或分类相关的(即,具有共同特征且属于同一类别;例如,松饼-蛋糕)。通过参与者评分和计算方法,我们在两个不同的项目集中展示了每种关系结构在相似性、共现性和熟悉度测量方面的不同模式。在一个标准的词汇判断任务(LDT)中,启动刺激和目标呈现之间存在各种延迟(刺激呈现间隔),两个项目集在三种关系下的目标反应时间和启动效应大小都是一致的。然而,在整个刺激呈现间隔中,在一些影响目标词识别的潜在测量指标(潜在语义分析、谷歌和比格犬)上,三种关系之间存在不同的模式。这些不同的模式表明了词汇启动的不同机制,并进一步证明了整合关系与主题关系和分类关系是不同的。

相似文献

1
Different influences on lexical priming for integrative, thematic, and taxonomic relations.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jul 11;6:205. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00205. eCollection 2012.
2
Integrative Priming of Compositional and Locative Relations.
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 15;8:359. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00359. eCollection 2017.
3
Automatic processing of semantic relations in fMRI: neural activation during semantic priming of taxonomic and thematic categories.
Brain Res. 2008 Jul 7;1218:194-205. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.03.045. Epub 2008 Apr 1.
4
Integrative priming occurs rapidly and uncontrollably during lexical processing.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009 Feb;138(1):112-30. doi: 10.1037/a0014677.
5
Predicting semantic priming at the item level.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Jul;61(7):1036-66. doi: 10.1080/17470210701438111.
6
Do visible semantic primes preactivate lexical representations?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Aug;46(8):1533-1569. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000825. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
7
Automatic processing of taxonomic and thematic relations in semantic priming - Differentiation by early N400 and late frontal negativity.
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Nov;64:54-62. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.09.013. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
8
The primacy of taxonomic semantic organization over thematic semantic organization during picture naming.
Cognition. 2025 Jan;254:105951. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105951. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
9
The unseen, the seen, and the spoken: Latent and overt priming in cyclic picture naming.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Oct;76(10):2410-2430. doi: 10.1177/17470218221144460. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
10
The relationship between contextual facilitation and depth of processing.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1983 Oct;9(4):697-712. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.9.4.697.

引用本文的文献

2
Co-activation of Taxonomic and Thematic Relations in Spoken Word Comprehension: Evidence From Eye Movements.
Front Psychol. 2019 May 3;10:964. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00964. eCollection 2019.
3
The Influence of Concreteness of Concepts on the Integration of Novel Words into the Semantic Network.
Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 4;8:2111. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02111. eCollection 2017.
4
Episodic Specificity in Acquiring Thematic Knowledge of Novel Words from Descriptive Episodes.
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 6;8:488. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00488. eCollection 2017.
5
Integrative Priming of Compositional and Locative Relations.
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 15;8:359. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00359. eCollection 2017.
6
Taxonomic and thematic semantic systems.
Psychol Bull. 2017 May;143(5):499-520. doi: 10.1037/bul0000092. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
7
Relational integrativity of prime-target pairs moderates congruity effects in evaluative priming.
Mem Cognit. 2016 May;44(4):565-79. doi: 10.3758/s13421-015-0581-8.
9
Introduction to the research topic meaning in mind: semantic richness effects in language processing.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Nov 5;7:723. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00723. eCollection 2013.
10
Flexible and fast: linguistic shortcut affects both shallow and deep conceptual processing.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2013 Jun;20(3):542-50. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0368-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Generalized event knowledge activation during online sentence comprehension.
J Mem Lang. 2012 May 1;66(4):545-567. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.01.001.
2
Integrating words that refer to typical sequences of events.
Can J Exp Psychol. 2012 Jun;66(2):106-14. doi: 10.1037/a0027369.
3
Individual differences in the strength of taxonomic versus thematic relations.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Nov;141(4):601-9. doi: 10.1037/a0026451. Epub 2011 Dec 26.
4
People Use their Knowledge of Common Events to Understand Language, and Do So as Quickly as Possible.
Lang Linguist Compass. 2009 Nov;3(6):1417-1429. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00174.x.
5
Embodied conceptual combination.
Front Psychol. 2010 Nov 25;1:212. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00212. eCollection 2010.
6
Integrative and semantic relations equally alleviate age-related associative memory deficits.
Psychol Aging. 2012 Mar;27(1):141-52. doi: 10.1037/a0023924. Epub 2011 May 30.
7
Relation priming in established compounds: facilitation?
Mem Cognit. 2011 Nov;39(8):1472-86. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0112-1.
8
Neuroanatomical dissociation for taxonomic and thematic knowledge in the human brain.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 May 17;108(20):8520-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014935108. Epub 2011 May 3.
10
When concepts combine.
Psychon Bull Rev. 1997 Jun;4(2):167-83. doi: 10.3758/BF03209392.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验