Suppr超能文献

对整合、主题和分类关系的词汇启动的不同影响。

Different influences on lexical priming for integrative, thematic, and taxonomic relations.

作者信息

Jones Lara L, Golonka Sabrina

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit MI, USA.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jul 11;6:205. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00205. eCollection 2012.

Abstract

Word pairs may be integrative (i.e., combination of two concepts into one meaningful entity; e.g., fruit-cake), thematically related (i.e., connected in time and place; e.g., party-cake), and/or taxonomically related (i.e., shared features and category co-members; e.g., muffin-cake). Using participant ratings and computational measures, we demonstrated distinct patterns across measures of similarity and co-occurrence, and familiarity for each relational construct in two different item sets. In a standard lexical decision task (LDT) with various delays between prime and target presentation (SOAs), target RTs and priming magnitudes were consistent across the three relations for both item sets. However, across the SOAs, there were distinct patterns among the three relations on some of the underlying measures influencing target word recognition (LSA, Google, and BEAGLE). These distinct patterns suggest different mechanisms of lexical priming and further demonstrate that integrative relations are distinct from thematic and taxonomic relations.

摘要

词对可能是整合性的(即,将两个概念组合成一个有意义的实体;例如,水果蛋糕)、主题相关的(即,在时间和地点上有联系;例如,派对-蛋糕),和/或分类相关的(即,具有共同特征且属于同一类别;例如,松饼-蛋糕)。通过参与者评分和计算方法,我们在两个不同的项目集中展示了每种关系结构在相似性、共现性和熟悉度测量方面的不同模式。在一个标准的词汇判断任务(LDT)中,启动刺激和目标呈现之间存在各种延迟(刺激呈现间隔),两个项目集在三种关系下的目标反应时间和启动效应大小都是一致的。然而,在整个刺激呈现间隔中,在一些影响目标词识别的潜在测量指标(潜在语义分析、谷歌和比格犬)上,三种关系之间存在不同的模式。这些不同的模式表明了词汇启动的不同机制,并进一步证明了整合关系与主题关系和分类关系是不同的。

相似文献

2
Integrative Priming of Compositional and Locative Relations.成分关系和位置关系的整合启动
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 15;8:359. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00359. eCollection 2017.
5
Predicting semantic priming at the item level.预测项目层面的语义启动效应。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2008 Jul;61(7):1036-66. doi: 10.1080/17470210701438111.
6
Do visible semantic primes preactivate lexical representations?可见语义启动词是否预先激活词汇表征?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2020 Aug;46(8):1533-1569. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000825. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
10
The relationship between contextual facilitation and depth of processing.情境促进与加工深度之间的关系。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1983 Oct;9(4):697-712. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.9.4.697.

引用本文的文献

5
Integrative Priming of Compositional and Locative Relations.成分关系和位置关系的整合启动
Front Psychol. 2017 Mar 15;8:359. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00359. eCollection 2017.
6
Taxonomic and thematic semantic systems.分类和主题语义系统。
Psychol Bull. 2017 May;143(5):499-520. doi: 10.1037/bul0000092. Epub 2017 Mar 23.

本文引用的文献

5
Embodied conceptual combination.具身概念组合。
Front Psychol. 2010 Nov 25;1:212. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00212. eCollection 2010.
8
Neuroanatomical dissociation for taxonomic and thematic knowledge in the human brain.人类大脑中分类和主题知识的神经解剖分离。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 May 17;108(20):8520-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014935108. Epub 2011 May 3.
10
When concepts combine.当概念结合。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1997 Jun;4(2):167-83. doi: 10.3758/BF03209392.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验