Suppr超能文献

在重症监护环境中实施辅助沟通:医疗保健专业人员的观点。

Implementing augmentative and alternative communication in critical care settings: Perspectives of healthcare professionals.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Section for Clinical Social Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.

DEFACTUM, Aarhus, Central Denmark Region, Denmark.

出版信息

J Clin Nurs. 2018 Jan;27(1-2):102-114. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13851. Epub 2017 Jun 20.

Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To describe the perspectives of healthcare professionals caring for intubated patients on implementing augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) in critical care settings.

BACKGROUND

Patients in critical care settings subjected to endotracheal intubation suffer from a temporary functional speech disorder and can also experience anxiety, stress and delirium, leading to longer and more complicated hospitalisation and rehabilitation. Little is known about the use of AAC in critical care settings.

METHOD

The design was informed by interpretive descriptive methodology along with the theoretical framework symbolic interactionism, which guided the study of healthcare professionals (n = 48) in five different intensive care units. Data were generated through participant observations and 10 focus group interviews.

RESULTS

The findings represent an understanding of the healthcare professionals' perspectives on implementing AAC in critical care settings and revealed three themes. Caring Ontology was the foundation of the healthcare professionals' profession. Cultural Belief represented the actual premise in the interactions during the healthcare professionals' work, saving lives in a biomedical setting whilst appearing competent and efficient, leading to Triggered Conduct and giving low priority to psychosocial issues like communication.

CONCLUSION

Lack of the ability to communicate puts patients at greater risk of receiving poorer treatment, which supports the pressuring need to implement and use AAC in critical care. It is documented that culture in biomedical paradigms can have consequences that are the opposite of the staffs' ideals. The findings may guide staff in implementing AAC strategies in their communication with patients and at the same time preserve their caring ontology and professional pride.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Improving communication strategies may improve patient safety and make a difference in patient outcomes. Increased knowledge of and familiarity with AAC strategies may provide healthcare professionals with an enhanced feeling of competence.

摘要

目的和目标

描述在重症监护环境中照顾插管患者的医疗保健专业人员对实施辅助和替代沟通(AAC)的看法。

背景

在重症监护环境中接受气管插管的患者患有暂时性功能性言语障碍,还可能经历焦虑、压力和谵妄,导致住院时间延长和康复过程更加复杂。在重症监护环境中使用 AAC 的情况知之甚少。

方法

该设计受解释性描述方法以及符号互动主义理论框架的启发,该理论框架指导了在五个不同的重症监护病房的 48 名医疗保健专业人员的研究。通过参与者观察和 10 个焦点小组访谈生成数据。

结果

研究结果代表了医疗保健专业人员对在重症监护环境中实施 AAC 的看法,并揭示了三个主题。关怀本体论是医疗保健专业人员职业的基础。文化信仰代表了医疗保健专业人员在工作互动中的实际前提,即在生物医学环境中拯救生命,同时表现出能力和效率,导致触发行为,并将沟通等心理社会问题置于次要地位。

结论

缺乏沟通能力会使患者面临治疗效果不佳的更大风险,这支持了在重症监护中实施和使用 AAC 的迫切需求。有记录表明,生物医学范式中的文化可能会产生与工作人员理想相反的后果。研究结果可以指导工作人员在与患者的沟通中实施 AAC 策略,同时保护他们的关怀本体论和职业自豪感。

临床相关性

改善沟通策略可能会提高患者安全性并改善患者预后。增加对 AAC 策略的了解和熟悉程度可能会增强医疗保健专业人员的能力感。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验