Green-Thompson Lionel P, McInerney Patricia, Woollard Bob
Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, PV Tobias Health Sciences Building, 5 York Road, Parktown, 2193, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Apr 12;17(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2239-7.
Social accountability is defined as the responsibility of institutions to respond to the health priorities of a community. There is an international movement towards the education of health professionals who are accountable to communities. There is little evidence of how communities experience or articulate this accountability.
In this grounded theory study eight community based focus group discussions were conducted in rural and urban South Africa to explore community members' perceptions of the social accountability of doctors. The discussions were conducted across one urban and two rural provinces. Group discussions were recorded and transcribed verbatim.
Initial coding was done and three main themes emerged following data analysis: the consultation as a place of love and respect (participants have an expectation of care yet are often engaged with disregard); relationships of people and systems (participants reflect on their health priorities and the links with the social determinants of health) and Ubuntu as engagement of the community (reflected in their expectation of Ubuntu based relationships as well as part of the education system). These themes were related through a framework which integrates three levels of relationship: a central community of reciprocal relationships with the doctor-patient relationship as core; a level in which the systems of health and education interact and together with social determinants of health mediate the insertion of communities into a broader discourse. An ubuntu framing in which the tensions between vulnerability and power interact and reflect rights and responsibility. The space between these concepts is important for social accountability.
Social accountability has been a concept better articulated by academics and centralized agencies. Communities bring a richer dimension to social accountability through their understanding of being human and caring. This study also creates the connection between ubuntu and social accountability and their mutual transformative capacity as agents for social justice.
社会问责制被定义为机构响应社区健康优先事项的责任。目前存在一场针对培养对社区负责的卫生专业人员的国际运动。但几乎没有证据表明社区如何体验或阐述这种问责制。
在这项扎根理论研究中,在南非的农村和城市地区进行了八次基于社区的焦点小组讨论,以探讨社区成员对医生社会问责制的看法。讨论在一个城市省份和两个农村省份进行。小组讨论进行了录音并逐字转录。
进行了初始编码,数据分析后出现了三个主要主题:作为爱与尊重场所的咨询(参与者期望得到关怀,但往往在被忽视的情况下接受服务);人与系统的关系(参与者反思他们的健康优先事项以及与健康社会决定因素的联系)以及作为社区参与的乌班图(体现在他们对基于乌班图关系的期望以及教育系统的一部分)。这些主题通过一个整合了三个关系层面的框架联系起来:一个以医患关系为核心的相互关系的中央社区层面;一个健康和教育系统相互作用并与健康社会决定因素一起调节社区融入更广泛话语的层面。一个乌班图框架,其中脆弱性与权力之间的紧张关系相互作用并反映权利和责任。这些概念之间的空间对社会问责制很重要。
社会问责制一直是一个由学者和中央机构阐述得更好的概念。社区通过对人性和关怀的理解为社会问责制带来了更丰富的维度。这项研究还建立了乌班图与社会问责制之间以及它们作为社会正义推动者的相互变革能力之间的联系。