Felker Mary Elizabeth, Bong Indah Waty, DePuy Walker Holton, Jihadah Lina Farida
Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 13;12(4):e0167943. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167943. eCollection 2017.
Measurement, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) systems are thought to be essential for effective carbon accounting and joint REDD+ carbon, conservation, and social development goals. Community participation in MRV (PMRV) has been shown to be both cost effective and accurate, as well as a method to potentially advance stakeholder empowerment and perceptions of legitimacy. Recognizing land tenure as a long-standing point of tension in REDD+ planning, we argue that its engagement also has a key role to play in developing a legitimate PMRV. Using household surveys, key informant interviews, and participatory mapping exercises, we present three 'lived' land tenure contexts in Indonesia to highlight their socially and ecologically situated natures and to consider the role of tenure pluralism in shaping PMRV. We then raise and interrogate three questions for incorporating lived land tenure contexts into a legitimate PMRV system: 1) Who holds the right to conduct PMRV activities?; 2) How are the impacts of PMRV differentially distributed within local communities?; and 3) What is the relationship between tenure security and motivation to participate in PMRV? We conclude with implementation lessons for REDD+ practitioners, including the benefits of collaborative practices, and point to critical areas for further research.
测量、报告与核实(MRV)系统被认为是有效进行碳核算以及实现REDD+联合碳目标、保护目标和社会发展目标的关键所在。社区参与测量、报告与核实(PMRV)已被证明既具有成本效益又准确无误,同时也是一种有可能促进利益相关者赋权以及增强合法性认知的方法。鉴于土地权属问题在REDD+规划中一直是一个长期存在的矛盾点,我们认为其在构建合法的PMRV过程中也能发挥关键作用。通过家庭调查、关键信息人访谈以及参与式绘图活动,我们呈现了印度尼西亚三种“实际存在的”土地权属情况,以突显其社会和生态背景特性,并探讨权属多元化在塑造PMRV方面所起的作用。然后,我们提出并探讨了将实际存在的土地权属情况纳入合法的PMRV系统的三个问题:1)谁有权开展PMRV活动?;2)PMRV的影响在当地社区内是如何差异化分布的?;3)权属安全性与参与PMRV的动机之间存在何种关系?我们最后为REDD+从业者总结了实施经验教训,包括合作实践的益处,并指出了有待进一步研究的关键领域。