• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国公众对 EQ-5D 未涵盖的健康重要方面的看法。

Views of the UK General Public on Important Aspects of Health Not Captured by EQ-5D.

机构信息

Office of Health Economics, Southside 7th floor, 105 Victoria Street, London, SW1E 6QT, UK.

Centre for Health Economics and Research Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, 1-59 Quay St, Haymarket, Sydney, NSW, 2000, Australia.

出版信息

Patient. 2017 Dec;10(6):701-709. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0240-1.

DOI:10.1007/s40271-017-0240-1
PMID:28409481
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The EQ-5D is a standardised instrument designed for use as a generic measure of health outcome. It was (and is) intended to provide information about a 'common core' of dimensions known to be relevant across a range of conditions; however, the five dimensions may not fully capture the health-related impacts of certain conditions. This study analyses the views of the UK general public about important aspects of health considered to be missing from the instrument.

METHODS

Survey respondents were asked whether there are any aspects of health they consider to be important but are not captured by the EQ-5D, and, if so, what these aspects are. The responses (text comments) were analysed using content analysis with analyst triangulation. Data were collected from a broadly representative sample of the general public via a paper questionnaire administered as part of face-to-face interviews.

RESULTS

Data are available for 436 respondents, 179 of whom suggested aspects of health they considered important but not captured by the five EQ-5D dimensions. These were organised into 22 themes. Sensory deprivation and mental health were the health aspects most commonly mentioned by respondents.

CONCLUSIONS

Respondents identified several important aspects of health that are not covered by the EQ-5D descriptive system. This study can provide the basis for more detailed qualitative and quantitative research-in particular to examine the views of different patient groups-to inform further review of the EQ-5D descriptive system. The results also have implications for the sensitivity of other generic measures.

摘要

简介

EQ-5D 是一种标准化的工具,旨在用作通用健康结果的衡量标准。它旨在提供与一系列疾病相关的已知“核心”维度的信息;然而,这五个维度可能无法完全捕捉到某些疾病对健康的相关影响。本研究分析了英国公众对该工具中缺失的重要健康方面的看法。

方法

调查受访者被问及他们是否认为健康的某些方面很重要,但 EQ-5D 并未涵盖这些方面,如果有,这些方面是什么。使用内容分析和分析师三角分析对这些答复(文本评论)进行了分析。数据来自通过纸质问卷收集的具有广泛代表性的一般公众样本,这些问卷是作为面对面访谈的一部分进行管理的。

结果

共有 436 名受访者提供了数据,其中 179 名受访者提出了他们认为重要但 EQ-5D 五个维度未涵盖的健康方面。这些方面被组织成 22 个主题。感官剥夺和心理健康是受访者最常提到的健康方面。

结论

受访者确定了 EQ-5D 描述系统未涵盖的几个重要健康方面。这项研究可以为更详细的定性和定量研究提供基础,特别是为了检查不同患者群体的观点,以进一步审查 EQ-5D 描述系统。结果还对其他通用衡量标准的敏感性产生影响。

相似文献

1
Views of the UK General Public on Important Aspects of Health Not Captured by EQ-5D.英国公众对 EQ-5D 未涵盖的健康重要方面的看法。
Patient. 2017 Dec;10(6):701-709. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0240-1.
2
Clinicians' Views on Therapeutic Outcomes of Systemic Interventions and on the Ability of the EQ-5D to Capture these Outcomes.临床医生对全身干预治疗效果及EQ-5D量表捕捉这些效果能力的看法。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2017 Sep 1;20(3):131-136.
3
Development of a disease-specific version of the EQ-5D-5L for use in patients suffering from psoriasis: lessons learned from a feasibility study in the UK.开发用于银屑病患者的 EQ-5D-5L 疾病专用版本:在英国进行可行性研究的经验教训。
Value Health. 2013 Dec;16(8):1156-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.10.003. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
4
An Exploratory Study on Using Principal-Component Analysis and Confirmatory Factor Analysis to Identify Bolt-On Dimensions: The EQ-5D Case Study.一项关于使用主成分分析和验证性因子分析来识别附加维度的探索性研究:EQ-5D案例研究。
Value Health. 2017 Dec;20(10):1362-1375. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
5
Comparison of generic, condition-specific, and mapped health state utility values for multiple myeloma cancer.多发性骨髓瘤癌症的通用型、疾病特异性和映射健康状态效用值比较。
Value Health. 2012 Dec;15(8):1059-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.2201.
6
Measuring population health: a comparison of three generic health status measures.衡量人群健康状况:三种通用健康状况测量方法的比较。
Med Care. 2003 Feb;41(2):218-31. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000044901.57067.19.
7
Valuing Health Using Time Trade-Off and Discrete Choice Experiment Methods: Does Dimension Order Impact on Health State Values?使用时间权衡法和离散选择实验法评估健康:维度顺序会影响健康状态值吗?
Value Health. 2016 Mar-Apr;19(2):210-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.11.005. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
8
A qualitative examination of the content validity of the EQ-5D-5L in patients with type 2 diabetes.对2型糖尿病患者中EQ-5D-5L内容效度的定性研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Dec 1;13:192. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0373-7.
9
The EQ-5D-5L Improves on the EQ-5D-3L for Health-related Quality-of-life Assessment in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty.EQ-5D-5L在全髋关节置换术患者的健康相关生活质量评估方面比EQ-5D-3L有所改进。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Nov;473(11):3383-90. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4091-y.
10
Does the EQ-5D measure quality of life in schizophrenia?EQ-5D量表能否衡量精神分裂症患者的生活质量?
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2011 Dec;14(4):187-96.

引用本文的文献

1
POPUP: an observational digital study reporting general population norms for the EQ-5D-5-L and HUI-3 in 8 countries.弹出窗口:一项观察性数字研究报告了8个国家EQ-5D-5-L和HUI-3的一般人群规范。
Arch Public Health. 2025 Jul 11;83(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s13690-025-01642-z.
2
Determining the Content Validity of the EQ-5D-5L, EQ-5D-Y-3L, and CHU9D Instruments for Assessing Generic Child and Adolescent Health-Related Quality of Life: A Qualitative Study.确定用于评估儿童和青少年总体健康相关生活质量的EQ-5D-5L、EQ-5D-Y-3L和CHU9D量表的内容效度:一项定性研究
Patient. 2025 May 16. doi: 10.1007/s40271-025-00743-9.
3
Validation of the cancer-specific utility measure EORTC QLU-C10D using evidence from four lung cancer trials covering six country value sets.

本文引用的文献

1
Health, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Quality of Life: What is the Difference?健康、健康相关生活质量和生活质量:有何区别?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Jul;34(7):645-9. doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0389-9.
2
An Empirical Study of Two Alternative Comparators for Use in Time Trade-Off Studies.用于时间权衡研究的两种替代比较器的实证研究。
Value Health. 2016 Jan;19(1):53-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.10.012. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
3
An exploratory study to test the impact on three "bolt-on" items to the EQ-5D.一项探索性研究,旨在测试对EQ-5D的三个“附加”项目的影响。
利用来自四项涵盖六个国家价值集的肺癌试验的证据,对癌症特异性效用测量指标EORTC QLU-C10D进行验证。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 28;15(1):14907. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83861-y.
4
Psychometric benefits of adding bolt-ons to the EQ-5D-5L in populations undergoing minimally invasive cosmetic procedures.在接受微创美容手术的人群中,将附加模块添加到EQ-5D-5L所带来的心理测量学益处。
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Mar 13. doi: 10.1007/s10198-025-01772-9.
5
A qualitative systematic review of the impact of hearing on quality of life.关于听力对生活质量影响的定性系统评价
Qual Life Res. 2025 Apr;34(4):879-892. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03851-5. Epub 2024 Nov 23.
6
Comparing Generic Paediatric Health-Related Quality-of-Life Instruments: A Dimensionality Assessment Using Factor Analysis.比较通用儿科健康相关生活质量工具:使用因子分析进行维度评估。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Jun;42(Suppl 1):81-94. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01382-y. Epub 2024 May 31.
7
Exploring potential EQ-5D bolt-on dimensions with a qualitative approach: an interview study in Hong Kong SAR, China.采用定性方法探索潜在的 EQ-5D 附加维度:在中国香港特别行政区的一项访谈研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024 May 31;22(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12955-024-02259-6.
8
Content validity of the EQ-5D-5L with skin irritation and self-confidence bolt-ons in patients with atopic dermatitis: a qualitative think-aloud study.特应性皮炎患者皮肤刺激和自信附加物 EQ-5D-5L 的内容效度:一项定性出声思维研究。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Jan;33(1):101-111. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03519-6. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
9
Criteria for developing, assessing and selecting candidate EQ-5D bolt-ons.开发、评估和选择 EQ-5D 附加模块的标准。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Oct;31(10):3041-3048. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03138-7. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
10
A qualitative investigation of the relevance of skin irritation and self-confidence bolt-ons and their conceptual overlap with the EQ-5D in patients with psoriasis.一项关于银屑病患者皮肤刺激和自我信心附加物的相关性及其与 EQ-5D 概念重叠的定性研究。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Oct;31(10):3049-3060. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03141-y. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
Value Health. 2015 Jan;18(1):52-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.09.004. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
4
Measuring quality of life in mental health: are we asking the right questions?衡量心理健康领域的生活质量:我们问对问题了吗?
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Nov;120:12-20. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.08.026. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
5
A program of methodological research to arrive at the new international EQ-5D-5L valuation protocol.制定新的国际 EQ-5D-5L 估值议定书的方法学研究方案。
Value Health. 2014 Jun;17(4):445-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.04.002.
6
Comparing the EQ-5D 3L and 5L: measurement properties and association with chronic conditions and multimorbidity in the general population.比较 EQ-5D 3L 和 5L:在普通人群中与慢性疾病和多种疾病的测量特性及相关性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 May 16;12:74. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-74.
7
Using generic preference-based measures in mental health: psychometric validity of the EQ-5D and SF-6D.在心理健康中使用通用偏好测量工具:EQ-5D 和 SF-6D 的心理测量学效度。
Br J Psychiatry. 2014 Sep;205(3):236-43. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.122283. Epub 2014 May 22.
8
The construct validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D, SF-6D and Diabetes Health Profile-18 in type 2 diabetes.2 型糖尿病患者 EQ-5D、SF-6D 和糖尿病健康状况量表-18 的结构效度和反应度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Mar 24;12:42. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-42.
9
Use of generic and condition-specific measures of health-related quality of life in NICE decision-making: a systematic review, statistical modelling and survey.使用通用和特定疾病健康相关生活质量测量指标进行 NICE 决策制定:系统评价、统计建模和调查。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Feb;18(9):1-224. doi: 10.3310/hta18090.
10
Development of a disease-specific version of the EQ-5D-5L for use in patients suffering from psoriasis: lessons learned from a feasibility study in the UK.开发用于银屑病患者的 EQ-5D-5L 疾病专用版本:在英国进行可行性研究的经验教训。
Value Health. 2013 Dec;16(8):1156-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.10.003. Epub 2013 Nov 11.