• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

转向商业领域——中小型工作场所多级干预后身体活动和久坐行为的变化。

Moving to business - changes in physical activity and sedentary behavior after multilevel intervention in small and medium-size workplaces.

作者信息

Aittasalo Minna, Livson Matleena, Lusa Sirpa, Romo Ahti, Vähä-Ypyä Henri, Tokola Kari, Sievänen Harri, Mänttäri Ari, Vasankari Tommi

机构信息

UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, P.O. Box 30, FI-33501, Tampere, Finland.

Finnish Sports Confederation, Valo, FI-00093, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2017 Apr 17;17(1):319. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4229-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-017-4229-4
PMID:28415993
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5392953/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Regular physical activity (PA) promotes and excessive sedentary behavior (SB) deteriorates health. Yet the Finnish working-aged population spends most of the day sitting. A 1-year Moving To Business (MTB) -intervention supported small and medium-size workplaces to combat sedentariness. This paper reports the changes in employees' PA and SB from before MTB (baseline) to 1 year after baseline (follow-up).

METHODS

Twelve workplaces with a total of 396 employees participated. Each workplace nominated a team to promote PA and reduce SB at organizational, working unit and employee level. The teams were mentored regionally through meetings, workshop and tools. Changes in PA and SB were assessed with a questionnaire and an accelerometer. Wald Confidence Interval (Cl) for a difference of proportions with matched pairs was used in the questionnaire data (%-points with 95% CI) and linear mixed model in the accelerometer data (minutes and % of wear-time with 95% CI).

RESULTS

The mean age of the respondents to the questionnaire (N = 296; 75%) was 42.6 (SD 10.9), 64% were women, 95% had some education after high school, 74% worked in the day shift, 71% did sedentary work and 51% were overweight. The mean number of actions implemented in the workplaces was 6.8 and the multilevel approach was fully applied in 6 workplaces. Based on the questionnaire the time spent in SB decreased from baseline to follow-up 16% (95% CI -29 to -3) in total and 22% (-41 to -3) at work. The accelerometer showed daily increases of 33.7 min (15.3 to 52.1) and 6.8% (3.1 to 10.4) in total PA, 30.9 min (15.3 to 46.5) and 6.1% (2.9 to 9.2) in light PA and 673 (209 to 1139) more steps at work. Daily SB at work decreased 44.9 min (-68.0 to -21.8) and 7.6% (-11.9 to -3.2). Daily leisure PA declined 11.0 min (-24.9 to 2.9) and 3.2% (-6.2 to -0.2). Number of levels or actions had no effect on changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Employees' PA increased and SB reduced at work during the intervention. At the same time leisure PA decreased slightly. Workplaces can achieve meaningful changes in employees' PA and SB if assisted systematically. Controlled studies are needed to confirm the present findings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT01999205 , registration date 11/01/2013.

摘要

背景

规律的体育活动(PA)对健康有益,而久坐行为(SB)过多则会损害健康。然而,芬兰劳动年龄人口一天中的大部分时间都坐着。一项为期一年的“走进企业”(MTB)干预措施支持中小企业应对久坐问题。本文报告了员工从MTB干预前(基线)到基线后1年(随访)期间PA和SB的变化情况。

方法

12个工作场所的396名员工参与其中。每个工作场所指定一个团队,在组织、工作单位和员工层面促进PA并减少SB。通过会议、研讨会和工具对这些团队进行区域指导。使用问卷和加速度计评估PA和SB的变化。问卷数据采用配对比例差异的Wald置信区间(CI)(95%CI的百分点),加速度计数据采用线性混合模型(95%CI的分钟数和佩戴时间百分比)。

结果

问卷受访者的平均年龄(N = 296;75%)为42.6岁(标准差10.9),64%为女性,95%高中毕业后接受过某种教育,74%上日班,71%从事久坐工作,51%超重。工作场所实施的平均行动数量为6.8项,6个工作场所完全采用了多层次方法。根据问卷,SB总时长从基线到随访减少了16%(95%CI -29至-3),工作时减少了22%(-41至-3)。加速度计显示,总PA每日增加33.7分钟(15.3至52.1)和6.8%(3.1至10.4),轻度PA增加30.9分钟(15.3至46.5)和6.1%(2.9至9.2),工作时多走673步(209至1139)。工作时的每日SB减少44.9分钟(-68.0至-21.8)和7.6%(-11.9至-3.2)。每日休闲PA减少11.0分钟(-24.9至2.9)和3.2%(-6.2至-0.2)。层次或行动数量对变化没有影响。

结论

干预期间员工的PA增加,工作时的SB减少。与此同时,休闲PA略有下降。如果得到系统协助,工作场所可以在员工的PA和SB方面实现有意义的变化。需要进行对照研究来证实目前的研究结果。

试验注册

NCT01999205,注册日期2013年1月11日。

相似文献

1
Moving to business - changes in physical activity and sedentary behavior after multilevel intervention in small and medium-size workplaces.转向商业领域——中小型工作场所多级干预后身体活动和久坐行为的变化。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Apr 17;17(1):319. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4229-4.
2
Objectively measured sedentary behavior and physical activity of Finnish 7- to 14-year-old children- associations with perceived health status: a cross-sectional study.芬兰7至14岁儿童的客观测量久坐行为和身体活动与感知健康状况的关联:一项横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2016 Apr 16;16:338. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3006-0.
3
KIDS OUT! Protocol of a brief school-based intervention to promote physical activity and to reduce screen time in a sub-cohort of Finnish eighth graders.“儿童外出!”:一项简短的校内干预方案,旨在促进芬兰八年级学生亚组的身体活动并减少屏幕时间。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 10;15:634. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2007-8.
4
Assessment of sedentary behaviors and transport-related activities by questionnaire: a validation study.通过问卷调查评估久坐行为和与交通相关的活动:一项验证研究。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 9;16:753. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3412-3.
5
The effect of a movement-to-music video program on the objectively measured sedentary time and physical activity of preschool-aged children and their mothers: A randomized controlled trial.一项音乐运动视频项目对学龄前儿童及其母亲客观测量的久坐时间和身体活动的影响:一项随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 31;12(8):e0183317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183317. eCollection 2017.
6
Objectively measured sedentary behavior and physical activity in a sample of Finnish adults: a cross-sectional study.芬兰成年人样本中客观测量的久坐行为和身体活动:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Sep 1;16(1):920. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3591-y.
7
Associations between objectively-measured sedentary behaviour and physical activity with bone mineral density in adults and older adults, the NHANES study.美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)研究:成年人及老年人中客观测量的久坐行为和身体活动与骨密度之间的关联
Bone. 2014 Jul;64:254-62. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
8
Shift workers have similar leisure-time physical activity levels as day workers but are more sedentary at work.轮班工人在休闲时间的身体活动水平与日班工人相似,但在工作时久坐不动的时间更多。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2017 Mar 1;43(2):127-135. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3614. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
9
Assessing and understanding sedentary behaviour in office-based working adults: a mixed-method approach.评估与理解办公室上班族的久坐行为:一种混合方法研究
BMC Public Health. 2016 Apr 27;16:360. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3023-z.
10
Intra-individual variability in day-to-day and month-to-month measurements of physical activity and sedentary behaviour at work and in leisure-time among Danish adults.丹麦成年人在工作和休闲时间的身体活动及久坐行为的日常和逐月测量中的个体内变异性。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Dec 3;16(1):1222. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3890-3.

引用本文的文献

1
The efficacy of interventions in the workplace promoting exercise and a healthy diet among shift workers: A systematic review.促进轮班工人锻炼和健康饮食的工作场所干预措施的效果:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 11;20(6):e0325071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325071. eCollection 2025.
2
Factors for adherence to a physical activity promotion program in the workplace: a systematic review.职场中坚持体育活动促进计划的因素:一项系统综述。
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 17;25(1):1827. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22775-4.
3
An umbrella review of efficacy of digital health interventions for workers.针对劳动者的数字健康干预措施疗效的综合评价。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Apr 14;8(1):207. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01578-2.
4
Sedentary behaviors and physical activity of the working population measured by accelerometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis.使用加速度计测量的工作人群的久坐行为和身体活动:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 6;24(1):2123. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19449-y.
5
The Impact of a Global Pandemic on Young Adult Sedentary Behavior and Physical Activity.全球大流行对青年久坐行为和身体活动的影响。
AJPM Focus. 2024 Feb 8;3(3):100202. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2024.100202. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Factors Reducing the Use of a Persuasive mHealth App and How to Mitigate Them: Thematic Analysis.减少有说服力的移动健康应用程序使用的因素及其缓解方法:主题分析
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Jun 26;10:e40579. doi: 10.2196/40579.
7
Effectiveness of Multicomponent Interventions and Physical Activity in the Workplace to Reduce Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.多成分干预措施及工作场所身体活动对减少肥胖的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Apr 18;11(8):1160. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11081160.
8
Where Does the Time Go? Displacement of Device-Measured Sedentary Time in Effective Sedentary Behaviour Interventions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.时间都去哪儿了?有效静坐行为干预中设备测量的静坐时间置换:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sports Med. 2022 Sep;52(9):2177-2207. doi: 10.1007/s40279-022-01682-3. Epub 2022 May 14.
9
Effects of Regular Long-Term Circuit Training (Once per Week) on Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Previously Sedentary Adults.定期长期循环训练(每周一次)对先前久坐的成年人心肺适能的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 17;18(20):10897. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010897.
10
Validity of the occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire (OSPAQ) for home-based office workers during the COVID-19 global pandemic: A secondary analysis.新冠疫情期间居家办公人群使用职业坐姿和体力活动问卷(OSPAQ)的有效性:一项二次分析。
Appl Ergon. 2021 Nov;97:103551. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103551. Epub 2021 Aug 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Objectively measured sedentary behavior and physical activity in a sample of Finnish adults: a cross-sectional study.芬兰成年人样本中客观测量的久坐行为和身体活动:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Sep 1;16(1):920. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3591-y.
2
A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial to Reduce Office Workers' Sitting Time: Effect on Activity Outcomes.一项旨在减少办公人员久坐时间的整群随机对照试验:对活动结果的影响。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Sep;48(9):1787-97. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000972.
3
Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work.减少工作时久坐的职场干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 17;3(3):CD010912. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010912.pub3.
4
European Sitting Championship: Prevalence and Correlates of Self-Reported Sitting Time in the 28 European Union Member States.欧洲坐姿锦标赛:28个欧盟成员国自我报告的坐姿时间的患病率及相关因素
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 2;11(3):e0149320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149320. eCollection 2016.
5
A systematic review of correlates of sedentary behaviour in adults aged 18-65 years: a socio-ecological approach.18至65岁成年人久坐行为相关因素的系统评价:一种社会生态方法
BMC Public Health. 2016 Feb 17;16:163. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2841-3.
6
Translating the Socio-Ecological Perspective Into Multilevel Interventions: Gaps Between Theory and Practice.将社会生态视角转化为多层次干预措施:理论与实践之间的差距。
Health Educ Behav. 2016 Feb;43(1):17-20. doi: 10.1177/1090198115605309.
7
Interventions to reduce sedentary behavior and increase physical activity during productive work: a systematic review.在工作期间减少久坐行为并增加身体活动的干预措施:一项系统综述。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016 May 1;42(3):181-191. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3544. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
8
Using Sit-to-Stand Workstations in Offices: Is There a Compensation Effect?在办公室使用坐站两用工作站:是否存在补偿效应?
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Apr;48(4):720-5. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000802.
9
How to reduce sitting time? A review of behaviour change strategies used in sedentary behaviour reduction interventions among adults.如何减少久坐时间?成人久坐行为干预中使用的行为改变策略综述。
Health Psychol Rev. 2016;10(1):89-112. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2015.1082146. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
10
Meta-analysis of the relationship between breaks in sedentary behavior and cardiometabolic health.久坐行为中断与心血管代谢健康关系的Meta分析。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015 Sep;23(9):1800-10. doi: 10.1002/oby.21180.