Suppr超能文献

简易轻度认知障碍筛查量表土耳其语版本的验证

Validation of the Turkish Version of the Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment Screen.

作者信息

Yavuz Burcu Balam, Varan Hacer Dogan, O'Caoimh Rónán, Kizilarslanoglu Muhammet Cemal, Kilic Mustafa Kemal, Molloy D William, Dogrul Rana Tuna, Karabulut Erdem, Svendrovski Anton, Sağır Aykut, Cankurtaran Eylem Sahin, Yesil Yusuf, Kuyumcu Mehmet Emin, Halil Meltem, Cankurtaran Mustafa

机构信息

1 Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

2 Centre for Gerontology and Rehabilitation, St Finbarr's Hospital, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2017 May;32(3):145-156. doi: 10.1177/1533317517691122.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to validate the Turkish version of the Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment (Q mci-TR) screen.

METHODS

In total, 100 patients aged ≥65 years referred to a geriatric outpatient clinic with memory loss were included. The Q mci was compared to the Turkish versions of the standardized Mini-Mental State Examination and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).

RESULTS

The Q mci-TR had higher accuracy than the MoCA in discriminating subjective memory complaints (SMCs) from cognitive impairment (mild cognitive impairment [MCI] or dementia), of borderline significance after adjusting for age and education ( P = .06). The Q mci-TR also had higher accuracy than the MoCA in differentiating MCI from SMC, which became nonsignificant after adjustment ( P = .15). A similar pattern was shown for distinguishing MCI from dementia. Test reliability for the Q mci-TR was strong.

CONCLUSION

The Q mci-TR is a reliable and useful screening tool for discriminating MCI from SMC and dementia in a Turkish population.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是验证简易轻度认知障碍筛查量表土耳其语版(Q mci-TR)。

方法

共纳入100名年龄≥65岁、因记忆力减退到老年门诊就诊的患者。将Q mci与标准化简易精神状态检查表和蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)的土耳其语版进行比较。

结果

在区分主观记忆障碍(SMC)与认知障碍(轻度认知障碍[MCI]或痴呆)方面,Q mci-TR比MoCA具有更高的准确性,在对年龄和教育程度进行校正后具有临界显著性(P = 0.06)。在区分MCI与SMC方面,Q mci-TR也比MoCA具有更高的准确性,校正后无显著性差异(P = 0.15)。在区分MCI与痴呆方面也呈现出类似模式。Q mci-TR的测试信度很强。

结论

Q mci-TR是一种可靠且有用的筛查工具,可用于在土耳其人群中区分MCI与SMC及痴呆。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Drug-related problems at the heart of cardiac surgery.药物相关问题是心脏手术的核心。
Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2024 Jun 21;31(4):332-338. doi: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-003669.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验