Marder Ellyn P, Cieslak Paul R, Cronquist Alicia B, Dunn John, Lathrop Sarah, Rabatsky-Ehr Therese, Ryan Patricia, Smith Kirk, Tobin-D'Angelo Melissa, Vugia Duc J, Zansky Shelley, Holt Kristin G, Wolpert Beverly J, Lynch Michael, Tauxe Robert, Geissler Aimee L
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Apr 21;66(15):397-403. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6615a1.
Foodborne diseases represent a substantial public health concern in the United States. CDC's Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet) monitors cases reported from 10 U.S. sites* of laboratory-diagnosed infections caused by nine enteric pathogens commonly transmitted through food. This report describes preliminary surveillance data for 2016 on the nine pathogens and changes in incidences compared with 2013-2015. In 2016, FoodNet identified 24,029 infections, 5,512 hospitalizations, and 98 deaths caused by these pathogens. The use of culture-independent diagnostic tests (CIDTs) by clinical laboratories to detect enteric pathogens has been steadily increasing since FoodNet began surveying clinical laboratories in 2010 (1). CIDTs complicate the interpretation of FoodNet surveillance data because pathogen detection could be affected by changes in health care provider behaviors or laboratory testing practices (2). Health care providers might be more likely to order CIDTs because these tests are quicker and easier to use than traditional culture methods, a circumstance that could increase pathogen detection (3). Similarly, pathogen detection could also be increasing as clinical laboratories adopt DNA-based syndromic panels, which include pathogens not often included in routine stool culture (4,5). In addition, CIDTs do not yield isolates, which public health officials rely on to distinguish pathogen subtypes, determine antimicrobial resistance, monitor trends, and detect outbreaks. To obtain isolates for infections identified by CIDTs, laboratories must perform reflex culture; if clinical laboratories do not, the burden of culturing falls to state public health laboratories, which might not be able to absorb that burden as the adoption of these tests increases (2). Strategies are needed to preserve access to bacterial isolates for further characterization and to determine the effect of changing trends in testing practices on surveillance.
食源性疾病是美国一个重大的公共卫生问题。美国疾病控制与预防中心的食源性疾病主动监测网络(FoodNet)监测来自美国10个地点*报告的由9种通常通过食物传播的肠道病原体引起的实验室确诊感染病例。本报告描述了2016年这9种病原体的初步监测数据以及与2013 - 2015年相比发病率的变化。2016年,FoodNet确认这些病原体导致了24,029例感染、5,512例住院和98例死亡。自2010年FoodNet开始对临床实验室进行调查以来,临床实验室使用非培养诊断检测(CIDTs)来检测肠道病原体的情况一直在稳步增加(1)。CIDTs使FoodNet监测数据的解读变得复杂,因为病原体检测可能会受到医疗保健提供者行为或实验室检测操作变化的影响(2)。医疗保健提供者可能更倾向于订购CIDTs,因为这些检测比传统培养方法更快且更易于使用,这种情况可能会增加病原体检测(3)。同样,随着临床实验室采用基于DNA的症候群检测板,病原体检测也可能在增加,这些检测板包含常规粪便培养中不常包含的病原体(4,5)。此外,CIDTs不会产生分离株,而公共卫生官员依靠分离株来区分病原体亚型、确定抗菌药物耐药性、监测趋势和检测疫情。为了获得由CIDTs鉴定出的感染的分离株,实验室必须进行追溯培养;如果临床实验室不这样做,培养的负担就落在州公共卫生实验室身上,随着这些检测的采用增加,州公共卫生实验室可能无法承担这一负担(2)。需要采取策略来确保能够获取细菌分离株以进行进一步鉴定,并确定检测操作趋势变化对监测的影响。