Pena Elena, Ojiaku MacArinze, Inacio Joao R, Gupta Ashish, Macdonald D Blair, Shabana Wael, Seely Jean M, Rybicki Frank J, Dennie Carole, Thornhill Rebecca E
Department of Medical Imaging, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, 1053 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON K1Y E49, Canada; Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Medical Imaging, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, 1053 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON K1Y E49, Canada; Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Acad Radiol. 2017 Oct;24(10):1277-1287. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.03.006. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
The study aimed to identify a radiomic approach based on CT and or magnetic resonance (MR) features (shape and texture) that may help differentiate benign versus malignant pleural lesions, and to assess if the radiomic model may improve confidence and accuracy of radiologists with different subspecialty backgrounds.
Twenty-nine patients with pleural lesions studied on both contrast-enhanced CT and MR imaging were reviewed retrospectively. Three texture and three shape features were extracted. Combinations of features were used to generate logistic regression models using histopathology as outcome. Two thoracic and two abdominal radiologists evaluated their degree of confidence in malignancy. Diagnostic accuracy of radiologists was determined using contingency tables. Cohen's kappa coefficient was used to assess inter-reader agreement. Using optimal threshold criteria, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of each feature and combination of features were obtained and compared to the accuracy and confidence of radiologists.
The CT model that best discriminated malignant from benign lesions revealed an AUC = 0.92 ± 0.05 (P < 0.0001). The most discriminative MR model showed an AUC = 0.87 ± 0.09 (P < 0.0001). The CT model was compared to the diagnostic confidence of all radiologists and the model outperformed both abdominal radiologists (P < 0.002), whereas the top discriminative MR model outperformed one of the abdominal radiologists (P = 0.02). The most discriminative MR model was more accurate than one abdominal (P = 0.04) and one thoracic radiologist (P = 0.02).
Quantitative textural and shape analysis may help distinguish malignant from benign lesions. A radiomics-based approach may increase diagnostic confidence of abdominal radiologists on CT and MR and may potentially improve radiologists' accuracy in the assessment of pleural lesions characterized by MR.
本研究旨在确定一种基于CT和/或磁共振(MR)特征(形状和纹理)的放射组学方法,该方法可能有助于鉴别良性与恶性胸膜病变,并评估放射组学模型是否可以提高具有不同亚专业背景的放射科医生的信心和准确性。
回顾性分析29例接受增强CT和MR成像检查的胸膜病变患者。提取了三种纹理特征和三种形状特征。以组织病理学结果为依据,使用特征组合生成逻辑回归模型。两名胸部放射科医生和两名腹部放射科医生评估了他们对恶性病变的信心程度。使用列联表确定放射科医生的诊断准确性。采用Cohen's kappa系数评估阅片者间的一致性。使用最佳阈值标准,获得每个特征及特征组合的敏感性、特异性和准确性,并与放射科医生所做诊断的准确性和信心进行比较。
最能区分恶性与良性病变的CT模型的AUC为0.92±0.05(P<0.0001)。最具鉴别力的MR模型的AUC为0.87±0.09(P<0.0001)。将CT模型与所有放射科医生的诊断信心进行比较,该模型的表现优于两名腹部放射科医生(P<0.002),而最具鉴别力的MR模型优于其中一名腹部放射科医生(P=0.02)。最具鉴别力的MR模型比一名腹部放射科医生(P=0.04)和一名胸部放射科医生(P=0.02)的诊断更准确。
定量纹理和形状分析可能有助于区分恶性与良性病变。基于放射组学的方法可能会提高腹部放射科医生对CT和MR的诊断信心,并可能提高放射科医生对以MR表现为特征的胸膜病变的评估准确性。