Suppr超能文献

分散注意力可增强对情绪刺激的识别:来自注意力增强效应的证据。

Divided attention enhances the recognition of emotional stimuli: evidence from the attentional boost effect.

作者信息

Rossi-Arnaud Clelia, Spataro Pietro, Costanzi Marco, Saraulli Daniele, Cestari Vincenzo

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , Sapienza University of Rome , Rome , Italy.

b Cell Biology and Neurobiology Institute, C.N.R. National Research Council of Italy , Rome , Italy.

出版信息

Memory. 2018 Jan;26(1):42-52. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1319489. Epub 2017 Apr 23.

Abstract

The present study examined predictions of the early-phase-elevated-attention hypothesis of the attentional boost effect (ABE), which suggests that transient increases in attention at encoding, as instantiated in the ABE paradigm, should enhance the recognition of neutral and positive items (whose encoding is mostly based on controlled processes), while having small or null effects on the recognition of negative items (whose encoding is primarily based on automatic processes). Participants were presented a sequence of negative, neutral and positive stimuli (pictures in Experiment 1, words in Experiment 2) associated to target (red) squares, distractor (green) squares or no squares (baseline condition). They were told to attend to the pictures/words and simultaneously press the spacebar of the computer when a red square appeared. In a later recognition task, stimuli associated to target squares were recognised better than stimuli associated to distractor squares, replicating the standard ABE. More importantly, we also found that: (a) the memory enhancement following target detection occurred with all types of stimuli (neutral, negative and positive) and (b) the advantage of negative stimuli over neutral stimuli was intact in the DA condition. These findings suggest that the encoding of negative stimuli depends on both controlled (attention-dependent) and automatic (attention-independent) processes.

摘要

本研究检验了注意增强效应(ABE)的早期阶段注意力提升假说的预测,该假说认为,如ABE范式中所体现的那样,编码时注意力的短暂增加应会增强对中性和积极项目(其编码主要基于控制性加工)的识别,而对消极项目(其编码主要基于自动加工)的识别影响较小或没有影响。向参与者呈现一系列与目标(红色)方块、干扰物(绿色)方块或无方块(基线条件)相关的消极、中性和积极刺激(实验1中的图片,实验2中的单词)。他们被告知要注意图片/单词,并在红色方块出现时同时按下电脑空格键。在随后的识别任务中,与目标方块相关的刺激比与干扰物方块相关的刺激被识别得更好,这重复了标准的ABE。更重要的是,我们还发现:(a)目标检测后的记忆增强在所有类型的刺激(中性、消极和积极)中都出现了,并且(b)在分心注意条件下,消极刺激相对于中性刺激的优势依然存在。这些发现表明,消极刺激的编码既依赖于控制性(注意力依赖)加工,也依赖于自动(注意力独立)加工。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验