Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University , 1, Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea.
Institute of Health and Environment, Graduate School of Public Health, Seoul National University , 1, Gwanak-ro, Gwanak-gu, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea.
Environ Sci Technol. 2017 Jul 5;51(13):7624-7638. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b00211. Epub 2017 May 24.
We evaluated the spatial-temporal dispersion of airborne nanomaterials during the use of spray consumer products and estimated the level of consumer inhalation exposure. A total of eight spray products including five propellant and three pump types were selected to evaluate the dispersion of airborne nanoparticles across time and space in a cleanroom which could control the background particles. Four products were advertised to contain silver and one contained titanium nanoparticles, while three products were specified no ENM but as being manufactured through the use of nanotechnology. We used direct-reading instruments with a thermodesorber unit to measure the particles (number, mass, surface area), as well as filter sampling to examine physicochemical characteristics. Sampling was conducted simultaneously at each location (1 m, near-field; 2, 3 m, far-field) by distance from the source. We estimated the inhaled doses at the breathing zone, and the doses deposited in each part of the respiratory tract using the experimental data and mathematical models. Nanoparticles released from the propellant sprays persisted in the air and dispersed over a large distance due to their small size (1466-5565 particles/cm). Conversely, the pump sprays produced larger droplets that settled out of the air relatively close to the source, so the concentration was similar to background level (<200 particles/cm). The estimates of inhalation exposure also suggested that exposure to nanoparticles was greater with propellant sprays (1.2 × 10 ± 4.0 × 10 particles/kgbw/day) than pump sprays (2.7 × 10 ± 6.5 × 10 particles/kgbw/day). We concluded that the propellant sprays create a higher risk of exposure than the pump sprays.
我们评估了使用喷雾消费品时空气中纳米材料的时空分散情况,并估计了消费者吸入暴露的水平。总共选择了 8 种喷雾产品,包括 5 种推进剂和 3 种泵型,以评估在一个可以控制背景颗粒的洁净室中,空气中纳米颗粒随时间和空间的分散情况。其中 4 种产品广告宣传含有银纳米颗粒,1 种产品含有钛纳米颗粒,而 3 种产品未指定含有纳米材料,但声称是通过纳米技术制造的。我们使用带有热脱附单元的直读仪器来测量颗粒(数量、质量、表面积),以及过滤采样来检查物理化学特性。通过距离源的远近,在每个位置(1 米,近场;2、3 米,远场)同时进行采样。我们使用实验数据和数学模型来估计呼吸区的吸入剂量以及呼吸道各部位的沉积剂量。由于推进剂喷雾产生的纳米颗粒粒径较小(1466-5565 个/厘米),因此在空气中持续存在并分散到较大距离。相比之下,泵喷雾产生的较大液滴在离源较近处沉降到空气中,因此浓度与背景水平相似(<200 个/厘米)。吸入暴露的估计也表明,与泵喷雾(2.7×10±6.5×10 个/千克 bw/天)相比,推进剂喷雾的暴露(1.2×10±4.0×10 个/千克 bw/天)更高。我们得出结论,推进剂喷雾比泵喷雾产生更高的暴露风险。