• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

绩效评估中的宽松偏差:与大五人格特质的相关性

Leniency Bias in Performance Ratings: The Big-Five Correlates.

作者信息

Cheng Kevin H C, Hui C Harry, Cascio Wayne F

机构信息

Innushuk ConsultSydney, NSW, Australia.

Department of Psychology, University of Hong KongHong Kong, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 10;8:521. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00521. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00521
PMID:28443043
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5385382/
Abstract

Some researchers assume that employees' personality characteristics affect leniency in rating others and themselves. However, little research has investigated these two tendencies at the same time. In the present study we developed one index for other-rating leniency and another one for self-rating leniency. Based on a review of the literature, we hypothesized that a generous assessment of peers would more likely be made by those who are extroverted and agreeable than by those who are not. Furthermore, a generous assessment of oneself would more likely be made by people who are conscientious and emotionally stable, than by people who are not. We also investigated if the leniency in rating others and the leniency in rating oneself are part of a more general leniency tendency. Data collected from a sample of real estate dealers provided support for the above hypotheses. Limitations and implications for future research are discussed.

摘要

一些研究者认为员工的性格特征会影响对他人和自己评价时的宽松程度。然而,很少有研究同时考察这两种倾向。在本研究中,我们制定了一个用于他人评价宽松度的指标和另一个用于自我评价宽松度的指标。基于文献综述,我们假设外向且随和的人比不具备这些特质的人更有可能对同龄人进行宽容的评价。此外,尽责且情绪稳定的人比其他人更有可能对自己进行宽容的评价。我们还研究了对他人评价的宽松度和对自己评价的宽松度是否是更普遍的宽松倾向的一部分。从房地产经纪人样本中收集的数据为上述假设提供了支持。文中讨论了研究的局限性以及对未来研究的启示。

相似文献

1
Leniency Bias in Performance Ratings: The Big-Five Correlates.绩效评估中的宽松偏差:与大五人格特质的相关性
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 10;8:521. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00521. eCollection 2017.
2
Conscientiousness and agreeableness as predictors of rating leniency.
J Appl Psychol. 2000 Apr;85(2):232-6. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.232.
3
Rating leniency and halo in multisource feedback ratings: testing cultural assumptions of power distance and individualism-collectivism.多源反馈评价中的评价宽松度和晕轮效应:检验权力距离和个体主义-集体主义的文化假设。
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Sep;96(5):1033-44. doi: 10.1037/a0023368.
4
Attitudes, self-monitoring, and appraisal behaviors.态度、自我监控和评估行为。
J Appl Psychol. 2001 Oct;86(5):875-83. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.875.
5
Correcting performance-rating errors in oral examinations.纠正口试中的成绩评定错误。
Eval Health Prof. 1991 Mar;14(1):100-22. doi: 10.1177/016327879101400107.
6
Search Dog Handlers Show Positive Bias When Scoring Their Own Dog's Performance.搜救犬训导员在对自己的犬只表现进行评分时表现出积极偏见。
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Sep 10;7:612. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00612. eCollection 2020.
7
Measurement of faculty anesthesiologists' quality of clinical supervision has greater reliability when controlling for the leniency of the rating anesthesia resident: a retrospective cohort study.当控制评价麻醉住院医师的宽松程度时,测量麻醉医师临床监督质量的方法具有更高的可靠性:一项回顾性队列研究。
Can J Anaesth. 2017 Jun;64(6):643-655. doi: 10.1007/s12630-017-0866-4. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
8
A matter of when, not whether: A meta-analysis of modesty bias in East Asian self-ratings of job performance.
J Appl Psychol. 2023 Feb;108(2):291-306. doi: 10.1037/apl0001046. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
9
Student Interest, Grading Leniency, and Teacher Ratings: A Conceptual Analysis.学生兴趣、评分宽松度与教师评价:概念分析
Contemp Educ Psychol. 2001 Jul;26(3):382-399. doi: 10.1006/ceps.2000.1070.
10
Big Five Personality Profiles in the Norwegian Special Operations Forces.挪威特种作战部队的大五人格特征
Front Psychol. 2020 May 5;11:747. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00747. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptions on the Use of Dissection Videos in Learning Gastrointestinal Anatomy among Medical Students.医学生对使用解剖视频学习胃肠解剖学的看法。
Acta Med Philipp. 2023 Oct 26;57(10):59-64. doi: 10.47895/amp.v57i10.7183. eCollection 2023.
2
Evaluation of a newly developed flipped-classroom course on interprofessional practice in health care for medical students.评估一门新开发的针对医学生的医疗保健跨专业实践翻转课堂课程。
Med Educ Online. 2023 Dec;28(1):2198177. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2023.2198177.
3
More than one third of clinical practice guidelines on low back pain overlap in AGREE II appraisals. Research wasted?超过三分之一的腰痛临床实践指南在 AGREE II 评估中存在重叠。研究浪费了吗?
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Jul 5;22(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01621-w.
4
Stronger Together: Personality, Intelligence and the Assessment of Career Potential.携手共进:个性、智力与职业潜力评估
J Intell. 2018 Nov 13;6(4):49. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence6040049.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring bias in self-reported data.测量自我报告数据中的偏差。
Int J Behav Healthc Res. 2011 Oct;2(4):320-332. doi: 10.1504/IJBHR.2011.043414.
2
Rating leniency and halo in multisource feedback ratings: testing cultural assumptions of power distance and individualism-collectivism.多源反馈评价中的评价宽松度和晕轮效应:检验权力距离和个体主义-集体主义的文化假设。
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Sep;96(5):1033-44. doi: 10.1037/a0023368.
3
Antecedents of team potency and team effectiveness: an examination of goal and process clarity and servant leadership.团队效力和团队效能的前因:对目标和过程清晰度及仆人式领导的检验。
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Jul;96(4):851-62. doi: 10.1037/a0022465.
4
Conceptualizing and assessing self-enhancement bias: a componential approach.自我提升偏差的概念化与评估:一种成分分析方法。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Jun;94(6):1062-77. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.1062.
5
In search of East Asian self-enhancement.寻找东亚人的自我提升。
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2007 Feb;11(1):4-27. doi: 10.1177/1088868306294587.
6
Effects of rater goals on rating patterns: evidence from an experimental field study.评分者目标对评分模式的影响:来自一项实验性实地研究的证据。
J Appl Psychol. 2007 Mar;92(2):577-85. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.577.
7
Assessing measurement equivalence across rating sources: a multitrait-multirater approach.评估不同评分来源间的测量等效性:一种多特质-多评分者方法。
J Appl Psychol. 2005 May;90(3):592-600. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.592.
8
Raters who pursue different goals give different ratings.追求不同目标的评分者给出的评分也不同。
J Appl Psychol. 2004 Feb;89(1):158-64. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.158.
9
Evidence of the construct validity of developmental ratings of managerial performance.管理绩效发展评级的结构效度证据。
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Feb;88(1):50-66. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.50.
10
Attitudes, self-monitoring, and appraisal behaviors.态度、自我监控和评估行为。
J Appl Psychol. 2001 Oct;86(5):875-83. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.875.