Kwan Virginia S Y, John Oliver P, Robins Richard W, Kuang Lu Lu
Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Jun;94(6):1062-77. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.1062.
Four studies implemented a componential approach to assessing self-enhancement and contrasted this approach with 2 earlier ones: social comparison (comparing self-ratings with ratings of others) and self-insight (comparing self-ratings with ratings by others). In Study 1, the authors varied the traits being rated to identify conditions that lead to more or less similarity between approaches. In Study 2, the authors examined the effects of acquaintance on the conditions identified in Study 1. In Study 3, the authors showed that using rankings renders the self-insight approach equivalent to the component-based approach but also has limitations in assessing self-enhancement. In Study 4, the authors compared the social-comparison and the component-based approaches in terms of their psychological implications; the relation between self-enhancement and adjustment depended on the self-enhancement approach used, and the positive-adjustment correlates of the social-comparison approach disappeared when the confounding influence of the target effect was controlled.
四项研究采用了一种成分分析法来评估自我提升,并将这种方法与之前的两种方法进行了对比:社会比较(将自我评分与他人评分进行比较)和自我洞察(将自我评分与他人给出的评分进行比较)。在研究1中,作者改变了被评估的特质,以确定导致不同方法之间相似度更高或更低的条件。在研究2中,作者考察了熟悉程度对研究1中所确定条件的影响。在研究3中,作者表明使用排名会使自我洞察方法等同于基于成分的方法,但在评估自我提升方面也存在局限性。在研究4中,作者从心理影响方面比较了社会比较方法和基于成分的方法;自我提升与适应之间的关系取决于所使用的自我提升方法,并且当目标效应的混杂影响得到控制时,社会比较方法的积极适应相关性就消失了。