Faust Joseph E, Yang Pei-Yin, Huang Huey W
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rice University, Houston, Texas.
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rice University, Houston, Texas.
Biophys J. 2017 Apr 25;112(8):1663-1672. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.03.003.
The bacterial membrane represents an attractive target for the design of new antibiotics to combat widespread bacterial resistance. Understanding how antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) and other membrane-active agents attack membranes could facilitate the design of new, effective antimicrobials. Despite intense study of AMPs on model membranes, we do not know how well the mechanism of attack translates to real biological membranes. To that end, we have characterized the attack of AMPs on Escherichia coli cytoplasmic membranes and directly compared this action to model membranes. AMPs induce membrane permeability in E. coli spheroplasts or giant unilamellar vesicles (GUVs) under well-defined concentrations of AMPs and fluorescent molecules. The action of AMPs on spheroplasts is unique in producing an intracellular fluorescence intensity time curve that increases in a sigmoidal fashion to a steady state. This regular pattern is reproducible by melittin, LL37, and alamethicin but not by CCCP or daptomycin, agents known to cause ion leakage. Remarkably, a similar pattern was also reproduced in GUVs. Indeed the steady-state membrane permeability induced by AMPs is quantitatively the same in spheroplasts and GUVs. There are, however, interesting dissimilarities in details that reveal differences between bacterial and lipid membranes. Spheroplast membranes are permeabilized by a wide range of AMP concentrations to the same steady-state membrane permeability. In contrast, only a narrow range of AMP concentrations permeabilized GUVs to a steady state. Tension in GUVs also influences the action of AMPs, whereas the spheroplast membranes are tensionless. Despite these differences, our results provide a strong support for using model membranes to study the molecular interactions of AMPs with bacterial membranes. As far as we know, this is the first time the actions of AMPs, on bacterial membranes and on model membranes, have been directly and quantitatively compared.
细菌膜是设计新型抗生素以对抗广泛存在的细菌耐药性的一个有吸引力的靶点。了解抗菌肽(AMPs)和其他膜活性剂如何攻击细胞膜有助于设计新的、有效的抗菌药物。尽管对AMPs在模型膜上进行了深入研究,但我们并不清楚其攻击机制在真实生物膜上的适用程度。为此,我们已对AMPs攻击大肠杆菌细胞质膜的情况进行了表征,并将此作用与模型膜直接进行了比较。在明确的AMPs和荧光分子浓度下,AMPs可诱导大肠杆菌原生质球或巨型单层囊泡(GUVs)的膜通透性。AMPs对原生质球的作用独特之处在于产生一种细胞内荧光强度随时间变化的曲线,该曲线呈S形增加至稳态。蜂毒肽、LL37和短杆菌肽可重现这种规律模式,但已知会导致离子泄漏的CCCP或达托霉素则不能。值得注意的是,在GUVs中也重现了类似模式。实际上,AMPs诱导的稳态膜通透性在原生质球和GUVs中在数量上是相同的。然而,在细节上存在有趣的差异,这揭示了细菌膜和脂质膜之间的不同。原生质球膜在广泛的AMPs浓度范围内被通透至相同的稳态膜通透性。相比之下,只有窄范围的AMPs浓度能使GUVs通透至稳态。GUVs中的张力也会影响AMPs的作用,而原生质球膜则没有张力。尽管存在这些差异,我们的结果为使用模型膜研究AMPs与细菌膜的分子相互作用提供了有力支持。据我们所知,这是首次直接且定量地比较了AMPs在细菌膜和模型膜上的作用。