• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内疚的修复维持合作,愤怒的报复破坏它。

Guilty repair sustains cooperation, angry retaliation destroys it.

机构信息

Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.

Horizon Digital Economy Research, University Of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 27;7:46709. doi: 10.1038/srep46709.

DOI:10.1038/srep46709
PMID:28447613
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5406841/
Abstract

Sustained cooperative social interactions are key to successful outcomes in many real-world contexts (e.g., climate change and energy conservation). We explore the self-regulatory roles of anger and guilt, as well as prosocial or selfish social preferences in a repeated social dilemma game framed around shared electricity use at home. We explore the proposal that for sustained cooperation, guilty repair needs to override angry retaliation. We show that anger is damaging to cooperation as it leads to retaliation and an increase of defection, while, through guilt, cooperation is repaired resulting in higher levels of cooperation. We demonstrate a disconnect between the experience of anger and subsequent retaliation which is a function of participants' social preferences. While there is no difference in reports of anger between prosocial and selfish individuals after finding out that others use more energy from the communal resource, prosocials are less likely to act on their anger and retaliate. Selfish individuals are motivated by anger to retaliate but not motivated by guilt to repair and contribute disproportionately to the breakdown of cooperation over repeated interactions. We suggest that guilt is a key emotion to appeal to when encouraging cooperation.

摘要

持续的合作社交互动是许多现实情境中取得成功的关键(例如,气候变化和节能)。我们探讨了愤怒和内疚的自我调节作用,以及在家庭用电共享的重复社会困境游戏中,亲社会或自私的社会偏好。我们探讨了这样一种观点,即要想持续合作,内疚的修复需要克服愤怒的报复。我们表明,愤怒对合作具有破坏性,因为它会导致报复和更多的背叛,而通过内疚,合作得到修复,从而提高合作水平。我们证明了愤怒的体验与随后的报复之间存在脱节,这是参与者社会偏好的一个功能。虽然在发现其他人从公共资源中使用更多能源后,亲社会者和自私者在愤怒报告方面没有差异,但亲社会者不太可能因愤怒而报复。自私的人会因愤怒而报复,但不会因内疚而修复,并且在多次互动中,他们不成比例地破坏了合作。我们认为,当鼓励合作时,内疚是一种关键的情感诉求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de1d/5406841/fce97702ca01/srep46709-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de1d/5406841/934c239968b2/srep46709-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de1d/5406841/8a653a518504/srep46709-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de1d/5406841/b9b742bc29f1/srep46709-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de1d/5406841/fce97702ca01/srep46709-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de1d/5406841/934c239968b2/srep46709-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de1d/5406841/8a653a518504/srep46709-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de1d/5406841/b9b742bc29f1/srep46709-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de1d/5406841/fce97702ca01/srep46709-f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Guilty repair sustains cooperation, angry retaliation destroys it.内疚的修复维持合作,愤怒的报复破坏它。
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 27;7:46709. doi: 10.1038/srep46709.
2
Cooperation across multiple game theoretical paradigms is increased by fear more than anger in selfish individuals.在自私的个体中,恐惧比愤怒更能增加多个博弈论范式之间的合作。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 30;11(1):9351. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88663-0.
3
Anger, guilt, and repeated cooperation in social dilemmas.愤怒、内疚与社会困境中的重复合作
Emotion. 2022 Apr;22(3):444-465. doi: 10.1037/emo0000897.
4
The prosocial functions of early social emotions: the case of guilt.早期社会情绪的亲社会功能:以内疚为例。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2018 Apr;20:25-29. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
5
Spontaneous cooperation for prosocials, but not for proselfs: Social value orientation moderates spontaneous cooperation behavior.亲社会者的自发合作行为存在,但利己者不存在:社会价值取向调节自发合作行为。
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 15;6:21555. doi: 10.1038/srep21555.
6
Response time in economic games reflects different types of decision conflict for prosocial and proself individuals.经济博弈中的反应时间反映了亲社会个体和自利个体在不同类型决策冲突中的表现。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jun 13;114(24):6394-6399. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1608877114. Epub 2017 May 30.
7
Social cuing of guilt by anger and of shame by disgust.通过愤怒暗示内疚,通过厌恶暗示羞耻。
Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;22(1):49-53. doi: 10.1177/0956797610392925. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
8
Intergroup emotional exchange: Ingroup guilt and outgroup anger increase resource allocation in trust games.群体间情感交流:内群体内疚感和外群体愤怒感会增加信任游戏中的资源分配。
Emotion. 2019 Jun;19(4):605-616. doi: 10.1037/emo0000463. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
9
Moving the self and others to do good: The emotional underpinnings of prosocial behavior.调动自我和他人行善:亲社会行为的情感基础。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Apr;44:80-88. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.08.029. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
10
Anger vs guilt: inference of responsibility attribution and interpersonal reactions.愤怒与内疚:责任归因推断及人际反应
Psychol Rep. 2001 Dec;89(3):731-9. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2001.89.3.731.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Guilt Feelings in the Development of the Burnout Process: The Influence on Psychosomatic Problems.内疚感在职业倦怠过程发展中的作用:对身心问题的影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Dec 13;14(12):1196. doi: 10.3390/bs14121196.
2
Mindfulness training reduces the preference for proenvironmental outcomes.正念训练减少了对有利于环境的结果的偏好。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 27;14(1):29526. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79137-0.
3
Feeling of guilt explains why people react differently to resource depletion warnings.内疚感解释了为什么人们对资源枯竭的警告会有不同的反应。

本文引用的文献

1
Does gratitude enhance prosociality?: A meta-analytic review.感恩是否能增强亲社会行为?一项元分析综述。
Psychol Bull. 2017 Jun;143(6):601-635. doi: 10.1037/bul0000103. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
2
Think global, act local: Preserving the global commons.全球思考,地方行动:保护全球公域。
Sci Rep. 2016 Nov 3;6:36079. doi: 10.1038/srep36079.
3
Strong reciprocity, human cooperation, and the enforcement of social norms.强互惠、人类合作与社会规范的执行
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 7;11(1):11988. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91472-0.
4
Influencing Change: When "Best Practice" Changes and the Prototypical Good Farmer Turns Bad.影响变革:当“最佳实践”发生变化,典型的好农民变成坏农民时。
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Mar 31;7:161. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00161. eCollection 2020.
5
Psychology of personal data donation.个人数据捐赠的心理学。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 20;14(11):e0224240. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224240. eCollection 2019.
Hum Nat. 2002 Mar;13(1):1-25. doi: 10.1007/s12110-002-1012-7.
4
Evolution of fairness in the one-shot anonymous Ultimatum Game.一次性匿名最后通牒博弈中的公平性演变。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Feb 12;110(7):2581-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1214167110. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
5
Spontaneous giving and calculated greed.自发的给予和算计的贪婪。
Nature. 2012 Sep 20;489(7416):427-30. doi: 10.1038/nature11467.
6
Pay-what-you-want, identity, and self-signaling in markets.按需付费、身份和市场中的自我信号传递。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 8;109(19):7236-40. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1120893109. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
7
Reciprocity: weak or strong? What punishment experiments do (and do not) demonstrate.互惠性:强还是弱?惩罚实验(能和不能)证明什么。
Behav Brain Sci. 2012 Feb;35(1):1-15. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X11000069.
8
Dynamic social networks promote cooperation in experiments with humans.动态社交网络促进了人类实验中的合作。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Nov 29;108(48):19193-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1108243108. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
9
Compassion: an evolutionary analysis and empirical review.同情:进化分析与实证研究综述。
Psychol Bull. 2010 May;136(3):351-74. doi: 10.1037/a0018807.
10
Are irrational reactions to unfairness truly emotionally-driven? Dissociated behavioural and emotional responses in the Ultimatum Game task.对不公平的非理性反应真的是由情感驱动的吗?最后通牒博弈任务中的行为和情感反应分离。
Cognition. 2010 Jan;114(1):89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.001. Epub 2009 Sep 27.