• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

按需付费、身份和市场中的自我信号传递。

Pay-what-you-want, identity, and self-signaling in markets.

机构信息

Rady School of Management, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 8;109(19):7236-40. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1120893109. Epub 2012 Apr 23.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.1120893109
PMID:22529370
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3358869/
Abstract

We investigate the role of identity and self-image consideration under "pay-what-you-want" pricing. Results from three field experiments show that often, when granted the opportunity to name the price of a product, fewer consumers choose to buy it than when the price is fixed and low. We show that this opt-out behavior is driven largely by individuals' identity and self-image concerns; individuals feel bad when they pay less than the "appropriate" price, causing them to pass on the opportunity to purchase the product altogether.

摘要

我们研究了“自定价格”定价下身份和自我形象考虑的作用。三项实地实验的结果表明,通常情况下,当消费者有机会为产品定价时,选择购买的消费者比固定低价时要少。我们表明,这种选择退出行为主要是由个人的身份和自我形象问题驱动的;当消费者支付的价格低于“适当”价格时,他们会感到不舒服,从而完全放弃购买该产品的机会。

相似文献

1
Pay-what-you-want, identity, and self-signaling in markets.按需付费、身份和市场中的自我信号传递。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 May 8;109(19):7236-40. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1120893109. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
2
The price is right!? A meta-regression analysis on willingness to pay for local food.价格合理吗?!对本地食品支付意愿的元回归分析。
PLoS One. 2019 May 29;14(5):e0215847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215847. eCollection 2019.
3
Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Imported Milk: Based on Shanghai, China.消费者对进口牛奶的支付意愿:以上海为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 29;17(1):244. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010244.
4
Estimating the 'consumer surplus' for branded versus standardised tobacco packaging.估算品牌烟草包装与标准化烟草包装的“消费者剩余”。
Tob Control. 2016 Nov;25(6):641-647. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052488. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
5
An improved deep forest model for prediction of e-commerce consumers' repurchase behavior.一种改进的深度森林模型,用于预测电子商务消费者的回购行为。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 20;16(9):e0255906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255906. eCollection 2021.
6
Buyer and seller data from pay what you want and name your own price laboratory markets.来自“随你付”和“自主定价”实验室市场的买卖双方数据。
Data Brief. 2017 May 4;12:513-517. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2017.04.049. eCollection 2017 Jun.
7
State-Level Affordability of Factory-Made Cigarettes among Current US Smokers: Findings from the ITC US Survey, 2003-2015.美国当前吸烟者对工厂制造香烟的州级支付能力:来自 ITC 美国调查的结果,2003-2015 年。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jul 9;16(13):2439. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132439.
8
Are Alcohol Taxation and Pricing Policies Regressive? Product-Level Effects of a Specific Tax and a Minimum Unit Price for Alcohol.酒精税和定价政策是否具有累退性?酒精从量税和最低单位价格的产品层面影响。
Alcohol Alcohol. 2016 Jul;51(4):493-502. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agv133. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
9
Heterogenous wealth effects of minimum unit price on purchase of alcohol: Evidence using scanner data.最低单位价格对酒类购买的异质财富效应:使用扫描仪数据的证据。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 5;14(12):e0225538. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225538. eCollection 2019.
10
You save money when you buy in bulk: does volume-based pricing cause people to buy more beer?批量购买能省钱:基于数量的定价会促使人们购买更多啤酒吗?
Health Econ. 2009 May;18(5):607-18. doi: 10.1002/hec.1403.

引用本文的文献

1
No good deed goes unpunished: the social costs of prosocial behaviour.善有恶报:亲社会行为的社会成本。
Evol Hum Sci. 2021 Jul 21;3:e40. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2021.35. eCollection 2021.
2
I do not want to set my own price! Indirect effects of emotions and moderation effects of skepticism explain reduced use intentions towards participative pricing models.我不想设定自己的价格!情绪的间接影响和怀疑态度的调节作用解释了对参与式定价模型的使用意愿降低的原因。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 14;18(2):e0275499. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275499. eCollection 2023.
3
Individuals prefer to harm their own group rather than help an opposing group.个体更倾向于伤害自己的群体而非帮助对立群体。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Dec 6;119(49):e2215633119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2215633119. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
4
The Effects of Nudges: One-Shot Only? Exploring the Temporal Spillover Effects of a Default Nudge.助推的效果:仅一次性有效?探究默认助推的时间溢出效应。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 13;12:683262. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.683262. eCollection 2021.
5
Field experimental evidence shows that self-interest attracts more sunlight.现场实验证据表明,自利吸引了更多的阳光。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Aug 25;117(34):20503-20510. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2004428117. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
6
A Secondary Mixed Methods Analysis of a Pay-it-Forward Gonorrhea/Chlamydia Testing Program Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in China.中国男男性行为人群中“传递关怀”淋球菌/沙眼衣原体检测项目的二次混合方法分析。
Sex Transm Dis. 2020 Jun;47(6):395-401. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001161.
7
Text Recycling in Scientific Writing.科学写作中的文字重复问题。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Jun;25(3):813-851. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-0008-y. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
8
The influence of a competition on noncompetitors.竞争对非竞争者的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 13;115(11):2716-2721. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1717301115. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
9
Dynamics in charity donation decisions: Insights from a large longitudinal data set.慈善捐赠决策中的动态变化:来自大型纵向数据集的见解
Sci Adv. 2017 Sep 20;3(9):e1700077. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1700077. eCollection 2017 Sep.
10
Guilty repair sustains cooperation, angry retaliation destroys it.内疚的修复维持合作,愤怒的报复破坏它。
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 27;7:46709. doi: 10.1038/srep46709.

本文引用的文献

1
Testing for altruism and social pressure in charitable giving.测试慈善捐赠中的利他主义和社会压力。
Q J Econ. 2012;127(1):1-56. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjr050.
2
Identity, morals, and taboos: beliefs as assets.身份、道德和禁忌:信仰即资产。
Q J Econ. 2011;126(2):805-55. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjr002.
3
Shared social responsibility: a field experiment in pay-what-you-want pricing and charitable giving.共同社会责任:一种在支付意愿定价和慈善捐赠方面的现场实验。
Science. 2010 Jul 16;329(5989):325-7. doi: 10.1126/science.1186744.