Suppr超能文献

对一个关于医生协助死亡的毛利 kaupapa 一致的合作研究项目的批判性探索。

A critical exploration of a collaborative Kaupapa Māori consistent research project on physician-assisted dying.

作者信息

Malpas Phillipa, Anderson Anneka, Wade Julie, Wharemate Rawiri, Paul Dolly, Jacobs Pio, Jacobs Takawai, Rauwhero Jim, Lunistra Danielle

机构信息

Senior Lecturer, Psychological Medicine, University of Auckland.

Lecturer, Te Kupenga Hauora Māori, University of Auckland.

出版信息

N Z Med J. 2017 Apr 28;130(1454):47-54.

Abstract

AIM

This paper critically explores the research approach undertaken by Māori and tauiwi researchers working alongside kaumātua within the context of physician-assisted dying. We critically explore the collaborative process we undertook in framing the research context and discuss the rewards and challenges that emerged.

METHOD

The research this critical discussion draws on undertook a qualitative Kaupapa Māori consistent research approach and drew on the principles of an Interface Research approach. The paper focuses on the collaborative approach taken between the 10 researchers involved in the study.

RESULTS

Challenges identified within the collaborative Kaupapa Māori consistent research process included: determining appropriate authority and representation of researchers and participants; maintaining clear communication; time and logistical management. The key strengths that emerged from this research design were: establishing a culturally safe and robust research process; an ability to build and maintain relationships between researchers and participants; and the opportunity to develop academic research skills between researchers and participants.

CONCLUSION

Collaborative Kaupapa Māori consistent research approaches to research can enable accountability, control and representation throughout the entire research process. Given the rich research results achieved and personal rewards gained from this study design, we would advocate for the application of such approaches within health research contexts.

摘要

目的

本文批判性地探讨了毛利族和非毛利族研究人员在医师协助死亡背景下与部落长老合作所采用的研究方法。我们批判性地探讨了在构建研究背景时所进行的合作过程,并讨论了由此产生的收获和挑战。

方法

本次批判性讨论所依据的研究采用了符合毛利族 kaupapa 理论的定性研究方法,并借鉴了界面研究方法的原则。本文重点关注参与该研究的 10 名研究人员之间所采用的合作方法。

结果

在符合毛利族 kaupapa 理论的合作研究过程中发现的挑战包括:确定研究人员和参与者的适当权限及代表性;保持清晰的沟通;时间和后勤管理。该研究设计的主要优势在于:建立一个文化上安全且稳健的研究过程;有能力在研究人员和参与者之间建立并维持关系;以及为研究人员和参与者提供发展学术研究技能的机会。

结论

符合毛利族 kaupapa 理论的合作研究方法能够在整个研究过程中实现问责制、控制权和代表性。鉴于从该研究设计中取得了丰富的研究成果并获得了个人收获,我们倡导在健康研究背景下应用此类方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验