Suppr超能文献

面向研究中分离样本的多元文化数据主权模型,过往、当前及未来结核分枝杆菌分离株研究的伦理风险

Ethical Stakes for Past, Present, and Prospective Tuberculosis Isolate Research Towards a Multicultural Data Sovereignty Model for Isolate Samples in Research.

作者信息

Anderson A, Meher M, Maroof Z, Malua S, Tahapeehi C, Littleton J, Arcus V, Wade J, Park J

机构信息

Te Kupenga Hauora Māori, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

School of Social Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland CBD, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Bioeth Inq. 2024 Dec;21(4):683-694. doi: 10.1007/s11673-023-10334-8. Epub 2024 May 27.

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) is a potentially fatal infectious disease that, in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ), inequitably affects Asian, Pacific, Middle Eastern, Latin American, and African (MELAA), and Māori people. Medical research involving genome sequencing of TB samples enables more nuanced understanding of disease strains and their transmission. This could inform highly specific health interventions. However, the collection and management of TB isolate samples for research are currently informed by monocultural biomedical models often lacking key ethical considerations. Drawing on a qualitative kaupapa Māori-consistent study, this paper reports on preliminary discussions with groups of Māori, Pacific, and Afghan people in NZ, whose communities have been harmed by TB and TB stigma. Participants' discussions highlight key concerns and meanings that ought to inform the development of guidelines and a more robust consultative process for the governance of how TB isolate samples are collected and used both retrospectively and in future research. We argue for ethical processes to be culturally nuanced and community-generated, flexible and meaningful, and situated in relation to the physical and symbolic effects of TB. We discuss the significance of Indigenous data sovereignty, rights, and kāwanatanga (governorship) in shaping a multicultural data sovereignty model.

摘要

结核病(TB)是一种潜在的致命传染病,在新西兰,它对亚洲、太平洋、中东、拉丁美洲和非洲(MELAA)以及毛利人产生了不公平的影响。涉及结核样本基因组测序的医学研究能够更细致地了解疾病菌株及其传播情况。这可为高度特定的健康干预措施提供依据。然而,目前用于研究的结核分离株样本的收集和管理是由单一文化的生物医学模式指导的,这种模式往往缺乏关键的伦理考量。基于一项与毛利人理念相符的定性研究,本文报告了与新西兰毛利人、太平洋岛民和阿富汗人群体的初步讨论,这些群体的社区受到了结核病和结核病污名化的伤害。参与者的讨论突出了一些关键问题和意义,这些问题和意义应该为制定指导方针以及更强大的协商过程提供参考,以管理结核分离株样本在回顾性研究和未来研究中的收集和使用方式。我们主张伦理程序应在文化上具有细微差别且由社区主导,灵活且有意义,并与结核病的物理和象征影响相关联。我们讨论了原住民数据主权、权利和“卡瓦纳坦加”(治理权)在塑造多元文化数据主权模式中的重要性。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验