Suppr超能文献

“育儿中的友好盟友”:一项针对通过在线交友网站寻求非传统共同育儿安排的男性和女性的调查。

'Friendly allies in raising a child': a survey of men and women seeking elective co-parenting arrangements via an online connection website.

作者信息

Jadva V, Freeman T, Tranfield E, Golombok S

机构信息

Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, Free School Lane, Cambridge CB2 3RF, UK

Centre for Family Research, University of Cambridge, Free School Lane, Cambridge CB2 3RF, UK.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 2015 Aug;30(8):1896-906. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev120. Epub 2015 Jun 3.

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION

What are the characteristics, motivations and expectations of men and women who search for a co-parent online?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Male and female prospective co-parents differed in terms of their motivations, choice of co-parent and expectations of co-parenting, while differences according to sexual orientation were less marked.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Very few studies have addressed the experiences of elective co-parents, i.e. men and women who are not in a relationship with each other creating and raising a child together. No study has examined the motivations and experiences of those who seek co-parents online.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE AND DURATION: An online survey was completed by 102 participants (61 men, 41 women) who were members of Pride Angel, an online connection website that facilitates contact between people looking for someone with whom to have a child. The survey was live for 7 weeks.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Details of the survey were emailed to all members of Pride Angel. The survey obtained data on participants' demographic characteristics, motivations, choice of co-parent and expectations of co-parenting. Data were analysed to examine differences by gender and by sexual orientation within each gender.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Approximately one-third of men and one half of women seeking co-parenting arrangements were heterosexual. The majority (69, 68%) of participants were single, although significantly more gay and bisexual men (15, 36%) and lesbian and bisexual women (11, 55%) had a partner compared with heterosexual men (4, 20%) and heterosexual women (2, 12%), respectively. Overall, the most important motivation for seeking co-parenting arrangements was in order for both biological parents to be involved in the child's upbringing. Co-parents were looking for someone with a good medical history. Most female co-parents expected the child to live with them, whereas male co-parents either wished the child to reside with the mother or to live equally in both households. A higher proportion of gay and bisexual men than heterosexual men wanted daily contact with the child.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Although this study presents data from the largest sample of elective co-parents to date, the main limitations were the low response rate and that only members of one website were approached. The findings may not be representative of all potential elective co-parents.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This study provides important insights into the new phenomenon of elective co-parenting. With the increasing use of assisted reproductive technologies and the diversification of family forms, a growing number of people are seeking co-parenting arrangements to have children. While up until now, elective co-parenting has been principally associated with the gay and lesbian community, this study shows that, with the rise of co-parenting websites, increasing numbers of heterosexual men and women are seeking these types of parenting arrangements. This study generates the first findings on the expectations and motivations of those who seek co-parents online and examines whether these differ according to gender and sexual orientation. Future studies are needed to assess the impact of this new form of parenting on all involved, particularly the children.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was supported by the Wellcome Trust (097857/Z/11/Z). Erika Tranfield is the co-founder of the website Pride Angel, the remaining authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

摘要

研究问题

在网上寻找共同育儿伙伴的男性和女性有哪些特征、动机和期望?

总结答案

准共同育儿的男性和女性在动机、共同育儿伙伴的选择以及对共同育儿的期望方面存在差异,而根据性取向的差异则不太明显。

已知信息

很少有研究涉及选择性共同育儿的经历,即彼此没有恋爱关系的男性和女性共同生育和抚养孩子。没有研究调查过那些在网上寻找共同育儿伙伴的人的动机和经历。

研究设计、规模与持续时间:102名参与者(61名男性,41名女性)完成了一项在线调查,他们都是Pride Angel网站的会员,该网站是一个在线交友平台,旨在帮助寻找共同生育孩子对象的人们建立联系。调查持续了7周。

参与者/材料、环境、方法:调查问卷的详细信息通过电子邮件发送给了Pride Angel网站的所有会员。该调查获取了参与者的人口统计学特征、动机、共同育儿伙伴的选择以及对共同育儿的期望等数据。对数据进行分析,以研究性别差异以及各性别内部不同性取向之间存在的差异。

主要结果及偶然因素的作用

寻求共同育儿安排的男性中约三分之一为异性恋,女性中约一半为异性恋。大多数(69人,68%)参与者为单身,不过与异性恋男性(4人,20%)和异性恋女性(2人,12%)相比,男同性恋者和双性恋男性(15人,36%)以及女同性恋者和双性恋女性(11人,55%)中有伴侣的比例明显更高。总体而言,寻求共同育儿安排的最重要动机是让孩子的亲生父母双方都能参与孩子的成长。共同育儿伙伴希望对方有良好的病史。大多数女性共同育儿伙伴希望孩子与自己生活在一起,而男性共同育儿伙伴要么希望孩子与母亲生活在一起,要么希望孩子能在两个家庭中平均居住。男同性恋者和双性恋男性中希望与孩子有日常接触的比例高于异性恋男性。

局限性、需谨慎的原因:尽管本研究提供了迄今为止最大规模的选择性共同育儿样本的数据,但主要局限性在于回复率较低,且仅联系了一个网站的会员。研究结果可能无法代表所有潜在的选择性共同育儿者。

研究结果的更广泛影响

本研究为选择性共同育儿这一新现象提供了重要见解。随着辅助生殖技术的日益普及和家庭形式的多样化,越来越多的人寻求共同育儿安排来生育孩子。虽然到目前为止,选择性共同育儿主要与同性恋群体相关,但本研究表明,随着共同育儿网站的兴起,越来越多的异性恋男性和女性也在寻求这类育儿安排。本研究首次得出了在网上寻找共同育儿伙伴的人的期望和动机,并研究了这些期望和动机是否因性别和性取向而有所不同。未来需要开展研究,以评估这种新的育儿形式对所有相关人员,尤其是孩子的影响。

研究资金/利益冲突:本研究由惠康信托基金(097857/Z/11/Z)资助。埃丽卡·特兰菲尔德是Pride Angel网站的联合创始人,其余作者声明无利益冲突。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3

本文引用的文献

1
A Multi-Domain Self-Report Measure of Coparenting.一份多领域共同养育自我报告量表。
Parent Sci Pract. 2012 Jan 1;12(1):1-21. doi: 10.1080/15295192.2012.638870. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
9
Children of lesbian and gay parents.女同性恋和男同性恋父母的子女。
Child Dev. 1992 Oct;63(5):1025-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1992.tb01679.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验