• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A need to simplify informed consent documents in cancer clinical trials. A position paper of the ARCAD Group.简化癌症临床试验知情同意书的必要性。ARCAD集团立场文件。
Ann Oncol. 2017 May 1;28(5):922-930. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx050.
2
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
3
Quantitative and qualitative analysis of study-related patient information sheets in randomised neuro-oncology phase III-trials.随机神经肿瘤学 III 期试验中与研究相关的患者信息表的定量和定性分析。
Eur J Cancer. 2014 Jan;50(1):150-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.09.006. Epub 2013 Oct 5.
4
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
5
Improvement of informed consent and the quality of consent documents.提高知情同意书及同意文件的质量。
Lancet Oncol. 2008 May;9(5):485-93. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70128-1.
6
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
7
The International Xenotransplantation Association consensus statement on conditions for undertaking clinical trials of porcine islet products in type 1 diabetes--chapter 7: Informed consent and xenotransplantation clinical trials.国际异种移植协会关于开展1型糖尿病猪胰岛产品临床试验条件的共识声明——第7章:知情同意与异种移植临床试验
Xenotransplantation. 2009 Jul-Aug;16(4):255-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2009.00546.x.
8
Assessment of Length and Readability of Informed Consent Documents for COVID-19 Vaccine Trials.新型冠状病毒肺炎疫苗试验知情同意书的长度与可读性评估
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e2110843. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10843.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Impact of therapeutic research on informed consent and the ethics of clinical trials: a medical oncology perspective.治疗性研究对知情同意及临床试验伦理的影响:肿瘤医学视角
J Clin Oncol. 1999 May;17(5):1601-17. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.5.1601.

引用本文的文献

1
Statistical Modeling for Quality Risk Assessment of Clinical Trials: Follow-Up at the Era of Remote Auditing.临床试验质量风险评估的统计建模:远程审计时代的随访。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 May;56(3):433-441. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00388-y. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
2
Guidelines for Biobanking of Bone Marrow Adipose Tissue and Related Cell Types: Report of the Biobanking Working Group of the International Bone Marrow Adiposity Society.骨髓脂肪组织和相关细胞类型生物样本库建立指南:国际骨髓脂肪协会生物样本库工作组报告。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Sep 27;12:744527. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.744527. eCollection 2021.
3
ESMO Clinical Research Observatory (ECRO): improving the efficiency of clinical research through rationalisation of bureaucracy.ESMO 临床研究观察站(ECRO):通过精简官僚主义提高临床研究效率。
ESMO Open. 2020 May;5(3):e000662. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2019-000662.
4
A randomized controlled study of a consent intervention for participating in an NIH genome sequencing study.一项参与 NIH 基因组测序研究的同意干预措施的随机对照研究。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2018 May;26(5):622-630. doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0105-7. Epub 2018 Feb 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Enduring and emerging challenges of informed consent.知情同意的持久和新兴挑战。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 26;372(9):855-62. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1411250.
2
Individual patient data analysis of progression-free survival versus overall survival as a first-line end point for metastatic colorectal cancer in modern randomized trials: findings from the analysis and research in cancers of the digestive system database.现代随机试验中以无进展生存期对比总生存期作为转移性结直肠癌一线终点的个体患者数据分析:来自消化系统癌症数据库分析与研究的结果
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan 1;33(1):22-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.5887. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
3
Association of age with survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: analysis from the ARCAD Clinical Trials Program.转移性结直肠癌患者年龄与生存的关联:来自ARCAD临床试验项目的分析
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Sep 20;32(27):2975-84. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.9329.
4
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言:涉及人类受试者的医学研究伦理原则》
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053.
5
Consent form heterogeneity in cancer trials: the cooperative group and institutional review board gap.癌症试验中同意书的异质性:合作组与机构审查委员会的差距。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Jul 3;105(13):947-53. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt143.
6
Void for vagueness: a problem in research consent?因模糊不清而无效:研究同意书中的一个问题?
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010 Mar;3(2):116-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.943134.
7
What oncologists tell patients about survival benefits of palliative chemotherapy and implications for informed consent: qualitative study.肿瘤学家向患者告知姑息性化疗的生存益处及对知情同意的影响:定性研究
BMJ. 2008 Jul 31;337:a752. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a752.
8
Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the member states relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use.欧洲议会和理事会2001年4月4日关于协调各成员国有关在人用药品临床试验实施中适用良好临床实践的法律、法规及行政规定的第2001/20/EC号指令。
Med Etika Bioet. 2002 Spring-Summer;9(1-2):12-9.
9
International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects.涉及人类受试者的生物医学研究国际伦理准则。
Bull Med Ethics. 2002 Oct(182):17-23.
10
Informed consent for clinical trials: a comparative study of standard versus simplified forms.临床试验的知情同意书:标准形式与简化形式的比较研究
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998 May 6;90(9):668-74. doi: 10.1093/jnci/90.9.668.

简化癌症临床试验知情同意书的必要性。ARCAD集团立场文件。

A need to simplify informed consent documents in cancer clinical trials. A position paper of the ARCAD Group.

作者信息

Bleiberg H, Decoster G, de Gramont A, Rougier P, Sobrero A, Benson A, Chibaudel B, Douillard J Y, Eng C, Fuchs C, Fujii M, Labianca R, Larsen A K, Mitchell E, Schmoll H J, Sprumont D, Zalcberg J

机构信息

Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium.

Freelance Auditor, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2017 May 1;28(5):922-930. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx050.

DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdx050
PMID:28453700
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5406755/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In respect of the principle of autonomy and the right of self-determination, obtaining an informed consent of potential participants before their inclusion in a study is a fundamental ethical obligation. The variations in national laws, regulations, and cultures contribute to complex informed consent documents for patients participating in clinical trials. Currently, only few ethics committees seem willing to address the complexity and the length of these documents and to request investigators and sponsors to revise them in a way to make them understandable for potential participants. The purpose of this work is to focus on the written information in the informed consent documentation for drug development clinical trials and suggests (i) to distinguish between necessary and not essential information, (ii) to define the optimal format allowing the best legibility of those documents.

METHODS

The Aide et Recherche en Cancérologie Digestive (ARCAD) Group, an international scientific committee involving oncologists from all over the world, addressed these issues and developed and uniformly accepted a simplified informed consent documentation for future clinical research.

RESULTS

A simplified form of informed consent with the leading part of 1200-1800 words containing all of the key information necessary to meet ethical and regulatory requirements and 'relevant supportive information appendix' of 2000-3000 words is provided.

CONCLUSIONS

This position paper, on the basis of the ARCAD Group experts discussions, proposes our informed consent model and the rationale for its content.

摘要

背景

就自主原则和自决权而言,在将潜在参与者纳入研究之前获得其知情同意是一项基本的伦理义务。国家法律、法规和文化的差异导致参与临床试验的患者的知情同意文件复杂多样。目前,似乎只有少数伦理委员会愿意处理这些文件的复杂性和篇幅问题,并要求研究者和申办者对其进行修订,以使潜在参与者能够理解。这项工作的目的是关注药物研发临床试验知情同意文件中的书面信息,并建议:(i)区分必要信息和非必要信息;(ii)确定能使这些文件具有最佳易读性的最佳格式。

方法

消化肿瘤辅助与研究(ARCAD)小组是一个由来自世界各地的肿瘤学家组成的国际科学委员会,该小组解决了这些问题,并为未来的临床研究制定并统一接受了一份简化的知情同意文件。

结果

提供了一种简化的知情同意书形式,其主要部分为1200 - 1800字,包含满足伦理和监管要求所需的所有关键信息,以及2000 - 3000字的“相关支持性信息附录”。

结论

本立场文件基于ARCAD小组专家的讨论,提出了我们的知情同意模型及其内容的基本原理。