Department of Oncology, University Clinic of Navarra and Health Research Institute of Navarra (IdiSNA), Pamplona, SpainPamplona, Spain.
Department of Oncology Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
ESMO Open. 2020 May;5(3):e000662. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2019-000662.
During the last years, there has been a dramatic increase in the administrative and bureaucratic burden associated with clinical research, which has clearly had an impact on its overall efficiency and on the activity of clinical investigators and research teams. Indeed, the supervision of the adherence of clinical research to Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines and legal regulations is of the utmost importance. Yet, while such regulations have remained largely unchanged during recent years, the number of administrative tasks and their complexity have grown markedly, as supported by the results of a survey performed among 940 clinical investigators that we report in this manuscript. Therefore, many investigators believe that it has become necessary to undertake a rigorous analysis of the causes and consequences of this issue, and to create a conduit to channel the advice from experienced investigators regarding clinical research procedures, in order to improve them. Based on these premises, ESMO has launched the ESMO Clinical Research Observatory (ECRO), a task force that will analyse different aspects of clinical research. ECRO will aim to provide the views of ESMO on clinical research procedures based on the feedback from clinical investigators, under complete adherence to the Declaration of Helsinki, the GCP guidelines and any other applicable legal regulations, while at the same time showing profound respect for all the stakeholders involved in clinical research. This manuscript provides the background and rationale for the creation of ECRO, its planned activity and an analysis of the current administrative burden in clinical research with recommendations to rationalise it. Indeed, we expect that this effort shall lead to a relevant improvement in the care of patients and in the development of clinical research.
在过去的几年中,与临床研究相关的行政和官僚负担急剧增加,这显然对其整体效率以及临床研究者和研究团队的活动产生了影响。事实上,监督临床研究是否符合良好临床规范(GCP)指南和法律法规至关重要。然而,尽管近年来这些法规基本保持不变,但行政任务的数量及其复杂性明显增加,我们在本文报告的一项针对 940 名临床研究者的调查结果对此提供了支持。因此,许多研究者认为,有必要对这一问题的原因和后果进行严格分析,并建立一个渠道,将有经验的研究者关于临床研究程序的建议汇集起来,以改进这些程序。基于这些前提,ESMO 启动了 ESMO 临床研究观察站(ECRO),这是一个将分析临床研究不同方面的工作组。ECRO 将根据临床研究者的反馈,在完全遵守赫尔辛基宣言、GCP 指南和任何其他适用的法律法规的基础上,提供 ESMO 对临床研究程序的看法,同时对参与临床研究的所有利益相关者表示深切尊重。本文提供了创建 ECRO 的背景和基本原理、其计划活动以及对临床研究中当前行政负担的分析,并提出了合理化建议。事实上,我们期望这一努力将导致患者护理和临床研究的发展得到显著改善。