Schötta Anna-Margarita, Wijnveld Michiel, Stockinger Hannes, Stanek Gerold
Institute for Hygiene and Applied Immunology, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Institute for Hygiene and Applied Immunology, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017 Jun 16;83(13). doi: 10.1128/AEM.00489-17. Print 2017 Jul 1.
Ticks transmit a large number of pathogens capable of causing human disease. In this study, the PCR-reverse line blot (RLB) method was used to screen for pathogens in a total of 554 ticks collected from all provinces of Austria. These pathogens belong to the genera , , / (including " Neoehrlichia"), , and The pathogens with the highest detected prevalence were spirochetes of the complex, in 142 ticks (25.6%). (80/142) was the most frequently detected species, followed by (38/142) and (36/142). , , and were found in 28 ticks, 5 ticks, and 1 tick, respectively. spp. were detected in 93 ticks (16.8%): (39/93), (38/93), (2/93), and (1/93). Thirteen samples remain uncharacterized. " Neoehrlichia mikurensis," spp. (, , ), and were found in 4.5%, 2.7%, and 0.7%, respectively. was not detected. Multiple microorganisms were detected in 40 ticks (7.2%), and the cooccurrence of spp. and " Neoehrlichia mikurensis" showed a significant positive correlation. We also compared different PCR-RLBs for detection of and spp. and showed that different detection approaches provide highly diverse results, indicating that analysis of environmental samples remains challenging. This study determined the wide spectrum of tick-borne bacterial and protozoal pathogens that can be encountered in Austria. Surveillance of (putative) pathogenic microorganisms occurring in the environment is of medical importance, especially when those agents can be transmitted by ticks and cause disease. The observation of significant coinfections of certain microorganisms in field-collected ticks is an initial step to an improved understanding of microbial interactions in ticks. In addition, we show that variations in molecular detection methods, such as in primer pairs and target genes, can considerably influence the final results. For instance, detection of certain genospecies of borreliae may be better or worse by one method or the other, a fact of great importance for future screening studies.
蜱虫传播大量能够引发人类疾病的病原体。在本研究中,采用聚合酶链反应-反向线印迹(PCR-RLB)方法,对从奥地利各省采集的总共554只蜱虫进行病原体筛查。这些病原体属于 属、 属、 / 属(包括“新埃立克体属”)、 属、 属和 属。检出率最高的病原体是 复合体的螺旋体,在142只蜱虫中检出(25.6%)。 (80/142)是最常检测到的物种,其次是 (38/142)和 (36/142)。 、 和 分别在28只、5只和1只蜱虫中被发现。 属在93只蜱虫中被检测到(16.8%): (39/93)、 (38/93)、 (2/93)和 (1/93)。13个 样本仍未鉴定。“米氏新埃立克体”、 属( 、 、 )和 分别在4.5%、2.7%和0.7%的蜱虫中被发现。未检测到 。在40只蜱虫中检测到多种微生物(7.2%), 属和“米氏新埃立克体”的共现呈现显著正相关。我们还比较了用于检测 属和 属的不同PCR-RLB方法,结果表明不同的检测方法提供的结果差异很大,这表明环境样本的分析仍然具有挑战性。本研究确定了在奥地利可能遇到的蜱传细菌和原生动物病原体的广泛范围。对环境中出现的(假定的)致病微生物进行监测具有医学重要性,特别是当这些病原体可以通过蜱虫传播并导致疾病时。观察野外采集的蜱虫中某些微生物的显著共感染情况,是更好地了解蜱虫中微生物相互作用的第一步。此外,我们表明,分子检测方法的变化,如引物对和靶基因的变化,会对最终结果产生很大影响。例如,一种方法检测某些疏螺旋体基因种的效果可能更好或更差,这一事实对未来的筛查研究非常重要。