Riley Joseph L, Cruz-Almeida Yenisel, Dasilva Ribeiro Margarete C, Simon Corey B, Eckert Nathan R, Aguirre Maria, Sorenson Heather L, Tighe Patrick J, Edwards Robert R, Wallet Shannon M
Department of Community Dentistry and Behavioral Science, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; Pain Research and Intervention Center of Excellence, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
Pain Research and Intervention Center of Excellence, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida; Institute of Aging, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
J Pain. 2017 Sep;18(9):1078-1086. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 Apr 29.
This study tested the hypothesis that older adults would have a stronger response for substance P (facilitatory) but weaker response to β-endorphin (inhibitory), in magnitude as well as time course. Eight younger and 9 older adults underwent 3 experimental sessions using well validated laboratory pain models: cold pressor task, contact heat pain, and a nonpainful control. Blood was collected through an indwelling catheter at baseline and 3, 15, 30, 45, and 60 minutes after stimuli administration. Older adults had higher baseline levels of both neuropeptides suggesting increased peripheral activity compared with younger adults. After the cold pressor task, older adults demonstrated a quick and strong release of substance P with dramatic recovery, whereas young adults maintained a constant low-grade response. Unlike substance P, β-endorphin increased between 3 and 15 minutes for both groups with the upsurge substantially higher for older adults. After heat pain, younger adults had an immediate surge in circulating substance P and β-endorphin that was more pronounced than among older adults. However, levels of substance P for younger adults slowly tapered whereas they continued to climb for the older adults through 30 minutes. β-endorphin peaked at 30 minutes for both groups and returned to baseline. No changes were observed during the nonpainful control session.
Older adults had higher baseline levels of substance P and β-endorphin suggesting increased peripheral activity compared with younger adults. After pain evocation, older adults demonstrated a more intense early response for both neuropeptides suggesting peripheral mechanisms involved in the response to pain may change with age.
本研究检验了这样一种假设,即老年人对P物质(促进性)的反应会更强,但对β-内啡肽(抑制性)的反应在强度和时间进程上会更弱。8名年轻人和9名老年人使用经过充分验证的实验室疼痛模型进行了3次实验:冷加压任务、接触性热痛和非疼痛对照。在基线以及刺激施加后3、15、30、45和60分钟,通过留置导管采集血液。与年轻人相比,老年人两种神经肽的基线水平更高,表明外周活性增加。在冷加压任务后,老年人表现出P物质的快速强烈释放并迅速恢复,而年轻人则保持持续的低水平反应。与P物质不同,两组的β-内啡肽在3至15分钟之间均有所增加,老年人的增幅明显更高。在热痛后,年轻人循环中的P物质和β-内啡肽立即激增,比老年人更明显。然而,年轻人的P物质水平缓慢下降,而老年人的P物质水平在30分钟内持续上升。两组的β-内啡肽在30分钟时达到峰值并恢复到基线水平。在非疼痛对照实验中未观察到变化。
与年轻人相比,老年人P物质和β-内啡肽的基线水平更高,表明外周活性增加。在诱发疼痛后,老年人对两种神经肽的早期反应更强烈,这表明参与疼痛反应的外周机制可能随年龄而变化。