Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
FrieslandCampina Development Center Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Jun 1;18(6):551.e9-551.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.03.006. Epub 2017 Apr 29.
The objectives of this study were to update the reference values of grip strength, to estimate the prevalence of low grip strength, and to examine the impact of different aspects of measurement protocol on grip strength values in Chinese adults.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional survey of Chinese men (n = 714) and women (n = 4014) aged 18-102 years was undertaken in different community settings in Hong Kong.
Grip strength was measured with a digital dynamometer (TKK 5401 Grip-D; Takei, Niigata, Japan). Low grip strength was defined as grip strength 2 standard deviations or more below the mean for young adults. The effects of measurement protocol on grip strength values were examined in a subsample of 45 men and women with repeated measures of grip strength taken with a hydraulic dynamometer (Baseline; Fabrication Enterprises Inc, Irvington, NY), using pair t-tests, intraclass correlation coefficient, and Bland and Altman plots.
Grip strength was greater among men than among women (P < .001) and the rate of decline differed between sexes (P < .001). The prevalence of low grip strength also increased with age, reaching a rate of 16.5% in men and 20.6% in women aged 65+. Although the TKK digital dynamometer gave higher grip strength values than the Baseline hydraulic dynamometer (P < .001), the degree of agreement between the 2 dynamometers was satisfactory. Higher grip strength values were also observed when the measurement was performed with the elbow extended in a standing position, compared with that with the elbow flexed at 90° in a sitting position, using the same dynamometer (P < .05).
This study updated the reference values of grip strength and estimated the prevalence of low grip strength among Chinese adults spanning a wide age range. These findings might be useful for risk estimation and evaluation of interventions. However, grip strength measurements should be interpreted with caution, as grip strength values can be affected by type of dynamometer used, assessment posture, and elbow position.
本研究旨在更新握力参考值,估计中国成年人握力降低的患病率,并探讨不同测量方案对握力值的影响。
设计、地点和参与者:本研究为横断面研究,在香港不同社区环境中对 18-102 岁的中国男性(n=714)和女性(n=4014)进行调查。
使用数字测力计(TKK 5401 Grip-D;日本高崎)测量握力。将握力低于青年成年人平均值 2 个标准差或更多定义为握力降低。在 45 名男性和女性中,使用液压测力计(基线;美国纽约欧文顿的 Fabrication Enterprises Inc.)重复测量握力,通过配对 t 检验、组内相关系数和 Bland 和 Altman 图来评估测量方案对握力值的影响。
男性的握力大于女性(P<0.001),且两性的下降率不同(P<0.001)。握力降低的患病率也随年龄增长而增加,在 65 岁及以上的男性中达到 16.5%,在女性中达到 20.6%。虽然 TKK 数字测力计给出的握力值高于基线液压测力计(P<0.001),但这两种测力计之间的一致性令人满意。使用相同的测力计,在站立时肘部伸展的位置进行测量时,握力值也高于肘部在坐姿下弯曲 90°时的测量值(P<0.05)。
本研究更新了中国成年人握力的参考值,并估计了握力降低的患病率。这些发现可能有助于风险评估和干预措施的评估。然而,由于握力值可能受到使用的测力计类型、评估姿势和肘部位置的影响,因此应谨慎解释握力测量值。