Cardiac Rehabilitation Unit, Department of Allied Health Professionals, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Largo Brambilla,3, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Department of Physiology, Anatomy and Cellular Biology, Pablo de Olavide University, Seville, Spain.
Clin Rheumatol. 2017 Oct;36(10):2325-2333. doi: 10.1007/s10067-017-3629-2. Epub 2017 May 2.
Effectiveness of exercise therapy in video display unit (VDU) workers with work-related chronic neck pain (W-RCNP) is unclear. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of group-based neck-shoulder resistance exercises on symptoms and muscular function in VDU workers with W-RCNP. Thirty-five employees with CNP were randomly assigned to neck-shoulder resistance exercise (NSRE) group or to conventional stretching and postural exercise (SPE) group. Participants trained 45 min, twice a week for 7 weeks. Primary outcomes were pain intensity (0-10 numeric rating scale, NRS) and pain-related disability (Vernon Neck Disability Index, NDI). Secondary outcomes were cervical active range of motion (AROM), endurance of neck flexors, strength of shoulder abductors, and health-related quality of life (SF-36). Post-treatment, pain and disability decreased 2.5 and 5 points in NSRE (p = 0.001) and 5 and 8 points in SPE (p = 0.002), with no significant differences between groups. AROM improved significantly in both groups; between-group differences were not significant. Neck flexors endurance and shoulder abductors strength improved by 59.6 and 34.2% (p = 0.001) in the NSRE group and by 27.6% (p = 0.009) and 2.3% (p = 0.002) in the SPE group; between-group differences were significant (p = 0.016 and p < 0.001, respectively). SF-36 score remained unchanged. NSRE and SPE are feasible and equally effective in reducing pain and pain-related disability as group exercises in W-RCNP. NSRE may provide some advantage in improving strength and endurance in neck muscles. Further, larger studies should confirm these findings and assess whether a better muscle function confers long-term clinical advantages.
运动疗法对与工作相关的慢性颈痛(W-RCNP)的视频显示单元(VDU)工人的疗效尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估基于小组的颈部-肩部阻力运动对患有 W-RCNP 的 VDU 工人的症状和肌肉功能的疗效。35 名患有 CNP 的员工被随机分配到颈部-肩部阻力运动(NSRE)组或常规伸展和姿势运动(SPE)组。参与者每周两次,每次 45 分钟,训练 7 周。主要结果是疼痛强度(0-10 数字评分量表,NRS)和与疼痛相关的残疾(Vernon 颈部残疾指数,NDI)。次要结果是颈椎主动活动范围(AROM)、颈部屈肌耐力、肩部外展肌力量和健康相关生活质量(SF-36)。治疗后,NSRE 组疼痛和残疾分别降低 2.5 和 5 分(p=0.001),SPE 组分别降低 5 和 8 分(p=0.002),两组之间无显著差异。两组的 AROM 均显著改善;组间差异无统计学意义。NSRE 组颈部屈肌耐力和肩部外展肌力量分别提高了 59.6%和 34.2%(p=0.001),SPE 组分别提高了 27.6%(p=0.009)和 2.3%(p=0.002);组间差异有统计学意义(p=0.016 和 p<0.001)。SF-36 评分保持不变。NSRE 和 SPE 作为团体运动治疗 W-RCNP 是可行且同样有效的,可以减轻疼痛和与疼痛相关的残疾。NSRE 可能在改善颈部肌肉力量和耐力方面提供一些优势。此外,还需要更大的研究来证实这些发现,并评估更好的肌肉功能是否带来长期的临床优势。