• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Ethics of community engagement in field trials of genetically modified mosquitoes.转基因蚊子田间试验中社区参与的伦理问题。
Dev World Bioeth. 2018 Jun;18(2):135-143. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12147. Epub 2017 May 3.
2
Informed consent and community engagement in open field research: lessons for gene drive science.知情同意与社区参与在野外研究中的应用:对基因驱动科学的启示。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Jul 27;20(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0389-3.
3
Community Engagement and Field Trials of Genetically Modified Insects and Animals.社区参与和转基因昆虫与动物的田间试验。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2018 Jan;48(1):25-36. doi: 10.1002/hast.808.
4
Two unresolved issues in community engagement for field trials of genetically modified mosquitoes.社区参与基因改造蚊子现场试验中的两个未解决问题。
Pathog Glob Health. 2019 Jul;113(5):238-245. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2019.1670490. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
5
Ethical issues in field trials of genetically modified disease-resistant mosquitoes.转基因抗病虫害蚊野外试验中的伦理问题。
Dev World Bioeth. 2014 Apr;14(1):37-46. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12011. Epub 2012 Dec 21.
6
Perspectives of people in Mali toward genetically-modified mosquitoes for malaria control.马里人民对用于疟疾控制的转基因蚊子的看法。
Malar J. 2010 May 14;9:128. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-9-128.
7
Procedural legitimacy: co-developing a community agreement model for genetic approaches research to malaria control in Africa.程序合法性:共同制定非洲疟疾控制遗传方法研究的社区协议模型。
Malar J. 2024 Nov 26;23(1):359. doi: 10.1186/s12936-024-05160-1.
8
Hybrid mosquitoes? Evidence from rural Tanzania on how local communities conceptualize and respond to modified mosquitoes as a tool for malaria control.杂交蚊子?来自坦桑尼亚农村地区的证据表明,当地社区如何将经过改良的蚊子作为疟疾控制工具进行概念化和应对。
Malar J. 2021 Mar 6;20(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12936-021-03663-9.
9
Public health concerns over gene-drive mosquitoes: will future use of gene-drive snails for schistosomiasis control gain increased level of community acceptance?公众对基因驱动蚊子的健康担忧:未来是否会增加社区对基因驱动蜗牛用于血吸虫病控制的接受程度?
Pathog Glob Health. 2020 Mar;114(2):55-63. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2020.1731667. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
10
Application of the Relationship-Based Model to Engagement for Field Trials of Genetically Engineered Malaria Vectors.基于关系模型在基因工程疟疾媒介田间试验中的应用。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Dec 21;104(3):805-811. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0868.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review of insecticide resistance in (Diptera: Culicidae) and implications for dengue control in Indonesia.印度尼西亚伊蚊(双翅目:蚊科)抗杀虫剂情况的系统综述及其对登革热防控的意义
Vet World. 2025 Mar;18(3):658-672. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2025.658-672. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
2
Biosafety, biosecurity, and bioethics.生物安全、生物安保和生物伦理。
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2024 Jun;42(1):137-167. doi: 10.1007/s40592-024-00204-3. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
3
Chemical Composition, Larvicidal and Molluscicidal Activity of Essential Oils of Six Guava Cultivars Grown in Vietnam.越南种植的六个番石榴品种精油的化学成分、杀幼虫和杀软体动物活性
Plants (Basel). 2023 Aug 7;12(15):2888. doi: 10.3390/plants12152888.
4
Lessons learned from the introduction of genetically engineered crops: relevance to gene drive deployment in Africa.从转基因作物的引入中吸取的教训:对非洲基因驱动部署的相关性。
Transgenic Res. 2022 Jun;31(3):285-311. doi: 10.1007/s11248-022-00300-2. Epub 2022 May 11.
5
Should Gene Editing Be Used to Develop Crops for Continuous-Living-Cover Agriculture? A Multi-Sector Stakeholder Assessment Using a Cooperative Governance Approach.基因编辑技术是否应用于发展永续覆盖农业的作物培育?基于合作治理方法的多部门利益相关者评估
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Feb 25;10:843093. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.843093. eCollection 2022.
6
Regulation of genetically engineered (GE) mosquitoes as a public health tool: a public health ethics analysis.作为公共卫生工具的基因工程(GE)蚊子的监管:公共卫生伦理分析。
Global Health. 2022 Feb 21;18(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00760-x.
7
An Ethical Overview of the CRISPR-Based Elimination of Anopheles gambiae to Combat Malaria.基于 CRISPR 的冈比亚按蚊消除以对抗疟疾的伦理概述。
J Bioeth Inq. 2022 Sep;19(3):371-380. doi: 10.1007/s11673-022-10172-0. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
8
Articulating ethical principles guiding Target Malaria's engagement strategy.阐明指导目标疟疾参与战略的伦理原则。
Malar J. 2022 Feb 5;21(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12936-022-04062-4.
9
"Maskandi experience": exploring the use of a cultural song for community engagement in preparation for a pilot Sterile Insect Technique release programme for malaria vector control in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa 2019.“面具狂欢体验”:探索利用一首文化歌曲来促进社区参与,为 2019 年南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省开展的疟疾媒介控制试点不育昆虫技术释放计划做准备。
Malar J. 2021 Apr 28;20(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12936-021-03736-9.
10
Experts' moral views on gene drive technologies: a qualitative interview study.专家对基因驱动技术的道德观点:一项定性访谈研究
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Mar 8;22(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00588-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Winged warriors.有翼战士。
Science. 2016 Oct 14;354(6309):164-167. doi: 10.1126/science.354.6309.164.
2
Communities need to be equal partners in determining whether research is acceptable.社区需要成为决定研究是否可接受的平等伙伴。
J Med Ethics. 2018 Mar;44(3):159-160. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103571. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
3
Genetically Modified (GM) Mosquito Use to Reduce Mosquito-Transmitted Disease in the US: A Community Opinion Survey.美国使用转基因蚊子减少蚊媒疾病:一项社区意见调查。
PLoS Curr. 2016 May 25;8:ecurrents.outbreaks.1c39ec05a743d41ee39391ed0f2ed8d3. doi: 10.1371/currents.outbreaks.1c39ec05a743d41ee39391ed0f2ed8d3.
4
Zika and the Risk of Microcephaly.寨卡病毒与小头畸形风险
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 7;375(1):1-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1605367. Epub 2016 May 25.
5
Short-term suppression of Aedes aegypti using genetic control does not facilitate Aedes albopictus.使用基因控制对埃及伊蚊进行短期抑制并不会促进白纹伊蚊(的滋生)。
Pest Manag Sci. 2016 Mar;72(3):618-28. doi: 10.1002/ps.4151. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
6
Public Acceptance of Plant Biotechnology and GM Crops.公众对植物生物技术和转基因作物的接受程度。
Viruses. 2015 Jul 30;7(8):4254-81. doi: 10.3390/v7082819.
7
Suppression of a Field Population of Aedes aegypti in Brazil by Sustained Release of Transgenic Male Mosquitoes.通过持续释放转基因雄蚊抑制巴西埃及伊蚊的野外种群
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Jul 2;9(7):e0003864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003864. eCollection 2015.
8
What makes community engagement effective?: Lessons from the Eliminate Dengue Program in Queensland Australia.如何使社区参与卓有成效?:来自澳大利亚昆士兰州消除登革热项目的经验教训。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Apr 13;9(4):e0003713. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003713. eCollection 2015 Apr.
9
Awareness and support of release of genetically modified "sterile" mosquitoes, Key West, Florida, USA.美国佛罗里达州基韦斯特对释放转基因“绝育”蚊子的认知与支持
Emerg Infect Dis. 2015 Feb;21(2):320-4. doi: 10.3201/eid2102.141035.
10
Ethical issues in field trials of genetically modified disease-resistant mosquitoes.转基因抗病虫害蚊野外试验中的伦理问题。
Dev World Bioeth. 2014 Apr;14(1):37-46. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12011. Epub 2012 Dec 21.

转基因蚊子田间试验中社区参与的伦理问题。

Ethics of community engagement in field trials of genetically modified mosquitoes.

作者信息

Resnik David B

出版信息

Dev World Bioeth. 2018 Jun;18(2):135-143. doi: 10.1111/dewb.12147. Epub 2017 May 3.

DOI:10.1111/dewb.12147
PMID:28470752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12088697/
Abstract

Effective community engagement is an important legal, ethical, and practical prerequisite for conducting field trials of genetically modified mosquitoes, because these studies can substantially impact communities and it is usually not possible to obtain informed consent from each community member. Researchers who are planning to conduct field trials should develop a robust community engagement strategy that meets widely recognized standards for seeking approval from the affected population, such as timeliness, consent, information sharing, transparency, understanding, responsiveness, mutual understanding, inclusiveness, and respectfulness. Additional research is needed on the effectiveness of different methods of engaging communities in field trials of genetically modified mosquitoes and how to respond to public opposition to genetically modified organisms. For research programs involving the genetic modification of disease vectors to move forward, they must have public acceptance and support, which cannot be achieved without effective community engagement.

摘要

有效的社区参与是开展转基因蚊子实地试验的重要法律、伦理和实际前提,因为这些研究可能对社区产生重大影响,而且通常无法获得每个社区成员的知情同意。计划开展实地试验的研究人员应制定强有力的社区参与策略,该策略要符合从受影响人群那里寻求批准的广泛认可标准,如及时性、同意、信息共享、透明度、理解、响应能力、相互理解、包容性和尊重。需要进一步研究不同方法在转基因蚊子实地试验中让社区参与的有效性,以及如何应对公众对转基因生物的反对。对于涉及对病媒进行基因改造的研究项目来说,要想推进,必须获得公众的接受和支持,而没有有效的社区参与就无法实现这一点。