Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, the Netherlands.
J Affect Disord. 2020 Mar 15;265:445-452. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.049. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
The heterogeneity of late-life depression hampers diagnosis and treatment. Data-driven methods have identified several subtypes of depression in older persons, but the longitudinal stability of these subtypes remains unknown.
In total 111 older persons with a major depressive disorder both at baseline and 2-year follow-up from the Netherlands Study of Depression in Older persons (NESDO) were included. Latent class analysis was performed to identify subtypes of depression at baseline and at 2-year follow-up, and latent transition analysis was used to examine the stability of these subtypes over time. Transition rates between subtypes and characteristics of groups were examined.
Two subtypes were identified in both baseline (T0) and follow-up data (T1), including a 'melancholic' subtype (prevalence 80.2% (T0) and 62.2% (T1)), and an 'atypical' subtype (prevalence 19.8% (T0) and 37.8% (T1)). The melancholic subtype was characterized by decreased appetite and weight and had a stability of 0.86. The atypical subtype was characterized by increased appetite and weight and had a stability of 0.93, although the discriminating power of different symptoms had decreased at T1. Mean age and education differed significantly between stable and transitioning subgroups, other characteristics did not differ between subgroups.
Limited sample size might have hampered the analyses.
Subtypes of late-life depression are relatively stable, but symptoms of depression (like weight loss) seem to blur with symptoms of (patho)physiological aging. This underlines the clinical relevance of depression subtyping, but also the importance of further research into subtypes and the influence of aging.
老年人抑郁症的异质性妨碍了诊断和治疗。数据驱动的方法已经在老年人中确定了几种抑郁症亚型,但这些亚型的纵向稳定性尚不清楚。
共有 111 名老年人在基线和 2 年随访时都患有主要抑郁症,这些老年人来自荷兰老年人抑郁研究(NESDO)。采用潜在类别分析在基线和 2 年随访时识别抑郁症亚型,采用潜在转移分析检查这些亚型随时间的稳定性。检查了亚型之间的转移率和组的特征。
在基线(T0)和随访数据(T1)中均确定了两种亚型,包括“忧郁型”亚型(患病率为 80.2%(T0)和 62.2%(T1))和“非典型”亚型(患病率为 19.8%(T0)和 37.8%(T1))。忧郁型亚型的特征是食欲和体重下降,稳定性为 0.86。非典型亚型的特征是食欲和体重增加,稳定性为 0.93,尽管在 T1 时不同症状的辨别力有所下降。稳定和转移亚组之间的平均年龄和教育程度有显著差异,其他特征在亚组之间没有差异。
样本量有限可能会影响分析。
老年抑郁症的亚型相对稳定,但抑郁症的症状(如体重减轻)似乎与(病理)生理衰老的症状混淆。这强调了抑郁症亚型的临床相关性,但也强调了进一步研究亚型和衰老影响的重要性。