Hunt Michael A, Takacs Judit, Krowchuk Natasha M, Hatfield Gillian L, Hinman Rana S, Chang Ryan
Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, 212-2177 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3 Canada.
Department of Physiotherapy, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia.
J Foot Ankle Res. 2017 May 2;10:20. doi: 10.1186/s13047-017-0201-x. eCollection 2017.
Pronated foot posture is associated with many clinical and biomechanical outcomes unique to medial compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA). Though shoe-worn insole treatment, including lateral wedges, is commonly studied in this patient population, their effects on the specific subgroup of people with medial knee OA and concomitant pronated feet are unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether lateral wedge insoles with custom arch support are more beneficial than lateral wedge insoles alone for knee and foot symptoms in people with medial tibiofemoral knee osteoarthritis (OA) and pronated feet.
Twenty-six people with pronated feet and symptomatic medial knee OA participated in a randomized crossover study comparing five degree lateral wedge foot insoles with and without custom foot arch support. Each intervention was worn for two months, separated by a two-month washout period of no insoles wear. Main outcomes included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and physical function subscales, the revised short-form Foot Function Index (FFI-R) pain and stiffness subscales, and the timed stair climb test. Regression modeling was conducted to examine treatment, period, and interaction effects.
Twenty-two participants completed the study, and no carryover or interaction effects were observed for any outcome. Significant treatment effects were observed for the timed stair climb, with greater improvements seen with the lateral wedges with arch support. Within-condition significant improvements were observed for WOMAC pain and physical function, as well as FFI-R pain and stiffness with lateral wedges with arch support use. More adverse effects were reported with the lateral wedges alone, while more people preferred the lateral wedges with arch support overall.
Addition of custom arch support to a standard lateral wedge insole may improve foot and knee symptoms in people with knee OA and concomitant pronated feet. These preliminary findings suggest further research evaluating the role of shoe-worn insoles for treatment of this specific sub-group of people with knee OA is warranted.
Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02234895.
旋前足姿势与许多内侧间室膝关节骨关节炎(OA)特有的临床和生物力学结果相关。尽管包括外侧楔形鞋垫在内的鞋内底治疗在该患者群体中得到了广泛研究,但它们对内侧膝关节OA合并旋前足的特定亚组人群的影响尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估带有定制足弓支撑的外侧楔形鞋垫是否比单独的外侧楔形鞋垫对胫股内侧膝关节骨关节炎(OA)和旋前足患者的膝关节和足部症状更有益。
26名旋前足且有症状的内侧膝关节OA患者参与了一项随机交叉研究,比较了有和没有定制足弓支撑的5度外侧楔形鞋垫。每种干预措施佩戴两个月,中间有两个月不穿鞋垫的洗脱期。主要结局包括西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)疼痛和身体功能分量表、修订后的简短足部功能指数(FFI-R)疼痛和僵硬分量表以及定时上楼梯试验。进行回归建模以检验治疗、时期和交互作用效应。
22名参与者完成了研究,未观察到任何结局的残留或交互作用效应。在定时上楼梯试验中观察到显著的治疗效果,带有足弓支撑的外侧楔形鞋垫有更大改善。在佩戴带有足弓支撑的外侧楔形鞋垫时,WOMAC疼痛和身体功能以及FFI-R疼痛和僵硬在组内有显著改善。单独使用外侧楔形鞋垫报告的不良反应更多,而总体上更多人更喜欢带有足弓支撑的外侧楔形鞋垫。
在标准外侧楔形鞋垫上添加定制足弓支撑可能会改善膝关节OA合并旋前足患者的足部和膝关节症状。这些初步发现表明,有必要进一步研究评估鞋内底在治疗这一特定膝关节OA亚组人群中的作用。
Clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT02234895。