AbbVie, North Chicago, Illinois.
Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Fertil Steril. 2017 May;107(5):1181-1190.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.03.020.
To compare direct and indirect costs between endometriosis patients who underwent endometriosis-related surgery (surgery cohort) and those who have not received surgery (no-surgery cohort).
Retrospective cohort study.
Not applicable.
PATIENT(S): Endometriosis patients (aged 18-49 years) with (n = 124,530) or without (n = 37,106) a claim for endometriosis-related surgery were identified from the Truven Health MarketScan Commercial and Health and Productivity Management databases for 2006-2014.
INTERVENTION(S): Not applicable.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Primary outcomes were healthcare utilization during 12-month pre- and post-index periods, annual direct (healthcare) and indirect (absenteeism and short- and long-term disability) costs during the 12-month post-index period (in 2014 US dollars). Indirect costs were assessed for patients with available productivity data.
RESULT(S): Patients in the surgery cohort had significantly higher healthcare resource utilization during the post-index period and had mean annual total adjusted post-index direct costs approximately three times the costs among patients in the no-surgery cohort ($19,203 [SD $7,133] vs. $6,365 [SD $2,364]; average incremental annual direct cost = $12,838). The mean cost of surgery ($7,268 [SD $7,975]) was the single largest contributor to incremental annual direct cost. Mean estimated annual total indirect costs were $8,843 (surgery cohort) vs. $5,603 (no-surgery cohort); average incremental annual indirect cost = $3,240.
CONCLUSION(S): Endometriosis patients who underwent surgery, compared with endometriosis patients who did not, incurred significantly higher direct costs due to healthcare utilization and indirect costs due to absenteeism or short-term disability. Regardless of the surgery type, the cost of index surgery contributed substantially to the total healthcare expenditure.
比较行子宫内膜异位症相关手术的子宫内膜异位症患者(手术队列)和未行手术的子宫内膜异位症患者(非手术队列)的直接和间接成本。
回顾性队列研究。
不适用。
2006 年至 2014 年,从 Truven Health MarketScan 商业和健康与生产力管理数据库中确定了符合(n=124530)或不符合(n=37106)子宫内膜异位症相关手术索赔的年龄在 18-49 岁的子宫内膜异位症患者。
不适用。
主要结局是索引前和索引后 12 个月的医疗保健利用情况,索引后 12 个月(2014 年)的年度直接(医疗保健)和间接(旷工和短期及长期残疾)成本。对于有生产力数据的患者,评估了间接成本。
手术队列患者在索引后期间的医疗资源利用明显更高,并且平均年度总调整后索引直接成本约为非手术队列患者的三倍($19203 [SD $7133] 比 $6365 [SD $2364];平均增量年度直接成本= $12838)。手术的平均成本($7268 [SD $7975])是增量年度直接成本的最大单一贡献者。平均估计年度总间接成本分别为手术队列 8843 美元($8843)和非手术队列 5603 美元($5603);平均增量年度间接成本= $3240。
与未行手术的子宫内膜异位症患者相比,行手术的子宫内膜异位症患者由于医疗保健利用和因旷工或短期残疾导致的间接成本,导致直接成本显著增加。无论手术类型如何,索引手术的费用都对总医疗支出有很大的贡献。