• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《应用政策信息系统(APIS)上的新型大麻政策分类法:解读大麻政策领域》

The New Cannabis Policy Taxonomy on APIS: Making Sense of the Cannabis Policy Universe.

作者信息

Klitzner Michael D, Thomas Sue, Schuler Jonathan, Hilton Michael, Mosher James

机构信息

The CDM Group, Inc., 7500 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA.

Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation-Santa Cruz, P.O. Box 7042, Santa Cruz, CA, 95061, USA.

出版信息

J Prim Prev. 2017 Jun;38(3):295-314. doi: 10.1007/s10935-017-0475-6.

DOI:10.1007/s10935-017-0475-6
PMID:28477299
Abstract

The National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism's Alcohol Policy Information System (APIS) is, for the first time, adding legal data pertaining to recreational cannabis use to its current offerings on alcohol policy. Now that Colorado, Washington, Oregon, Alaska, and the District of Columbia have legalized aspects of recreational cannabis, and more states are considering it, there is an urgency to provide high-quality, multi-dimensional legal data to the public health community. This article introduces the Cannabis Policy Taxonomy recently posted on APIS, and explores its theoretical and empirical contributions to the substance abuse literature and its potential for use in policy research. We also present results of interviews with public health experts in alcohol and cannabis policy, which sought to determine the most important variables to address in the initial release of cannabis policy data. From this process, we found that pricing controls emerged as the variable singled out by the largest number of experts. This analysis points to a host of vital policies that are of increasing importance to public health policy scholars and their current and future research.

摘要

美国国立酒精滥用与酒精中毒研究所的酒精政策信息系统(APIS)首次在其现有的酒精政策内容中增加了与娱乐性大麻使用相关的法律数据。鉴于科罗拉多州、华盛顿州、俄勒冈州、阿拉斯加州和哥伦比亚特区已将娱乐性大麻的某些方面合法化,且更多州正在考虑此事,因此迫切需要向公共卫生界提供高质量、多维度的法律数据。本文介绍了最近发布在APIS上的大麻政策分类法,并探讨了其对药物滥用文献的理论和实证贡献以及在政策研究中的潜在用途。我们还展示了对酒精和大麻政策方面的公共卫生专家进行访谈的结果,这些访谈旨在确定在大麻政策数据首次发布时需要解决的最重要变量。通过这个过程,我们发现价格控制是被最多专家挑出的变量。这一分析指出了一系列对公共卫生政策学者及其当前和未来研究日益重要的关键政策。

相似文献

1
The New Cannabis Policy Taxonomy on APIS: Making Sense of the Cannabis Policy Universe.《应用政策信息系统(APIS)上的新型大麻政策分类法:解读大麻政策领域》
J Prim Prev. 2017 Jun;38(3):295-314. doi: 10.1007/s10935-017-0475-6.
2
County-Level Recreational Marijuana Policies and Local Policy Changes in Colorado and Washington State (2012-2019).县级娱乐大麻政策与科罗拉多州和华盛顿州的地方政策变化(2012-2019)。
Milbank Q. 2021 Dec;99(4):1132-1161. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12535. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
3
Exploring the effect of Colorado's recreational marijuana policy on opioid overdose rates.探讨科罗拉多州娱乐用大麻政策对阿片类药物过量率的影响。
Public Health. 2020 Aug;185:8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.04.007. Epub 2020 Jun 3.
4
How four U.S. states are regulating recreational marijuana edibles.美国四个州如何监管娱乐用大麻食品。
Int J Drug Policy. 2017 May;43:83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.01.018. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
5
Six policy lessons relevant to cannabis legalization.与大麻合法化相关的六条政策经验教训。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2019;45(6):698-706. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2019.1569669. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
6
Thinking Carefully About Marijuana Legalization: Public Health Considerations for State Policy Makers.审慎思考大麻合法化:州政策制定者的公共卫生考量
Psychiatr Serv. 2019 Jul 1;70(7):629-630. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201900124. Epub 2019 May 6.
7
Cannabis Retail Market Indicators in Five Legal States in the United States: A Public Health Perspective.美国五个合法州的大麻零售市场指标:公共卫生视角。
Clin Ther. 2023 Aug;45(8):778-786. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.06.015. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
8
The association between recreational cannabis commercialization and cannabis exposures reported to the US National Poison Data System.休闲大麻商业化与向美国国家毒物数据系统报告的大麻暴露之间的关联。
Addiction. 2020 Oct;115(10):1890-1899. doi: 10.1111/add.15019. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
9
In the weeds: a baseline view of cannabis use among legalizing states and their neighbours.乱象丛生:合法化州及其周边地区大麻使用情况的基线观察
Addiction. 2016 Jun;111(6):973-80. doi: 10.1111/add.13282. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
10
Lessons learned after three years of legalized, recreational marijuana: The Colorado experience.三年合法娱乐用大麻经验教训:科罗拉多经验。
Prev Med. 2017 Nov;104:4-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.02.021. Epub 2017 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Health, safety, and socioeconomic impacts of cannabis liberalization laws: An evidence and gap map.大麻合法化法律对健康、安全及社会经济的影响:证据与差距图谱
Campbell Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 30;19(4):e1362. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1362. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Alignment in local approaches to alcohol and cannabis control policy: A case study of California cities and counties.地方层面的酒精和大麻控制政策趋同:以加利福尼亚市和郡为例的研究
Int J Drug Policy. 2023 Sep;119:104114. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104114. Epub 2023 Jul 11.
3
PROTOCOL: The effects of cannabis liberalization laws on health, safety, and socioeconomic outcomes: An evidence and gap map.

本文引用的文献

1
The effects of price on the consequences of alcohol use and abuse.价格对酒精使用及滥用后果的影响。
Recent Dev Alcohol. 1998;14:331-46. doi: 10.1007/0-306-47148-5_15.
2
Alcohol availability, alcohol consumption and alcohol-related damage. I. The distribution of consumption model.酒精可及性、酒精消费与酒精相关损害。I. 消费模式分布
J Stud Alcohol. 1986 Jan;47(1):1-10. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1986.47.1.
3
The primary prevention of alcohol problems: a critical review of the research literature.酒精问题的一级预防:对研究文献的批判性综述。
方案:大麻合法化法律对健康、安全和社会经济成果的影响:证据与差距图谱。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 13;17(1):e1137. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1137. eCollection 2021 Mar.
4
Equity in Coverage of Local Cannabis Control Policies in California, 2020‒2021.2020-2021 年加利福尼亚州地方大麻管制政策覆盖的公平性。
Am J Public Health. 2022 Nov;112(11):1640-1650. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.307041. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
5
A Spatiotemporal Analysis of the Association of California City and County Cannabis Policies with Cannabis Outlet Densities.加利福尼亚市和县大麻政策与大麻销售点密度的时空关联分析。
Epidemiology. 2022 Sep 1;33(5):715-725. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001512. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
6
What to Do When Everything Happens at Once: Analytic Approaches to Estimate the Health Effects of Co-Occurring Social Policies.当一切同时发生时该怎么办:分析方法估计同时发生的社会政策对健康的影响。
Epidemiol Rev. 2022 Jan 14;43(1):33-47. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxab005.
7
Risk factors for the onset of dependence and chronic psychosis due to cannabis use: Survey of patients with cannabis-related psychiatric disorders.因使用大麻而出现依赖和慢性精神病的风险因素:与大麻相关精神障碍患者的调查。
Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2020 Dec;40(4):332-341. doi: 10.1002/npr2.12133. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
J Stud Alcohol. 1989 Jan;50(1):54-88. doi: 10.15288/jsa.1989.50.54.