• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会评价中的视听整合

Audiovisual integration in social evaluation.

作者信息

Mileva Mila, Tompkinson James, Watt Dominic, Burton A Mike

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of York.

Department of Language and Linguistic Science, University of York.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Jan;44(1):128-138. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000439. Epub 2017 May 8.

DOI:10.1037/xhp0000439
PMID:28481565
Abstract

Our social evaluation of other people is influenced by their faces and their voices. However, rather little is known about how these channels combine in forming "first impressions." Over 5 experiments, we investigate the relative contributions of facial and vocal information for social judgments: dominance and trustworthiness. The experiments manipulate each of these sources of information within-person, combining faces and voices giving rise to different social attributions. We report that vocal pitch is a reliable source of information for judgments of dominance (Study 1), but not trustworthiness (Study 4). Faces and voices make reliable, but independent, contributions to social evaluation. However, voices have the larger influence in judgments of dominance (Study 2), whereas faces have the larger influence in judgments of trustworthiness (Study 5). The independent contribution of the 2 sources appears to be mandatory, as instructions to ignore 1 channel do not eliminate its influence (Study 3). Our results show that information contained in both the face and the voice contributes to first impression formation. This combination is, to some degree, outside conscious control, and the weighting of channel contribution varies according the trait being perceived. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

我们对他人的社会评价会受到他们的面部和声音的影响。然而,对于这些渠道如何结合形成“第一印象”,我们所知甚少。在超过5个实验中,我们研究了面部和声音信息对社会判断(支配性和可信度)的相对贡献。实验在个体内部操纵这些信息来源,将面部和声音结合起来,从而产生不同的社会归因。我们报告称,音调是判断支配性(研究1)的可靠信息来源,但不是判断可信度(研究4)的可靠信息来源。面部和声音对社会评价做出了可靠但独立的贡献。然而,声音在支配性判断中影响更大(研究2),而面部在可信度判断中影响更大(研究5)。这两种信息来源的独立贡献似乎是强制性的,因为忽略一个渠道的指令并不能消除其影响(研究3)。我们的结果表明,面部和声音中包含的信息都有助于第一印象的形成。这种结合在一定程度上不受意识控制,并且渠道贡献的权重会根据所感知的特质而有所不同。(PsycINFO数据库记录)

相似文献

1
Audiovisual integration in social evaluation.社会评价中的视听整合
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Jan;44(1):128-138. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000439. Epub 2017 May 8.
2
Low Vocal Pitch Preference Drives First Impressions Irrespective of Context in Male Voices but Not in Female Voices.低音调偏好驱动第一印象,无论男性声音处于何种情境,但女性声音并非如此。
Perception. 2016 Aug;45(8):946-963. doi: 10.1177/0301006616643675.
3
Voice-based assessments of trustworthiness, competence, and warmth in blind and sighted adults.针对盲人和视力正常成年人基于语音的可信度、能力和亲和力评估。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Jun;24(3):856-862. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1146-y.
4
The Multimodal Trust Effects of Face, Voice, and Sentence Content.面孔、声音和句子内容的多模态信任效应。
Multisens Res. 2024 Apr 3;37(2):125-141. doi: 10.1163/22134808-bja10119.
5
Vocal fundamental and formant frequencies affect perceptions of speaker cooperativeness.嗓音基频和共振峰频率会影响对说话者合作性的感知。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016;69(9):1657-75. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1091484. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
6
Idiosyncratic and shared contributions shape impressions from voices and faces.个体特质和共同特征塑造了对声音和面孔的印象。
Cognition. 2024 Oct;251:105881. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105881. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
7
Face gender and stereotypicality influence facial trait evaluation: Counter-stereotypical female faces are negatively evaluated.面部的性别和刻板印象会影响对面部特征的评价:与刻板印象相悖的女性面孔会得到负面评价。
Br J Psychol. 2015 May;106(2):186-208. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12085. Epub 2014 Aug 28.
8
Evidence Head Tilt Has Dissociable Effects on Dominance and Trustworthiness Judgments, But Does Not Have Category-Contingent Effects on Hypothetical Leadership Judgments.有证据表明,头部倾斜对支配力和可信度判断有不同的影响,但对假设的领导力判断没有类别相关的影响。
Perception. 2020 Feb;49(2):199-209. doi: 10.1177/0301006619898589.
9
The influence of subtle facial expressions on children's first impressions of trustworthiness and dominance is not adult-like.微妙的面部表情对儿童的可信度和支配力第一印象的影响不像成年人那样。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Apr;180:19-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.12.002. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
10
What is typical is good: the influence of face typicality on perceived trustworthiness.典型的就是好的:面孔典型性对可感知可信度的影响。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Jan;26(1):39-47. doi: 10.1177/0956797614554955. Epub 2014 Dec 15.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of noun animacy on the processing of L1 and L2 action metaphors among Chinese English learners: An event-related potential study.名词生命性对中国英语学习者第一语言和第二语言动作隐喻加工的影响:一项事件相关电位研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jun 27;104(26):e43036. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043036.
2
How do voice acoustics affect the perceived trustworthiness of a speaker? A systematic review.语音声学如何影响说话者的可信度感知?一项系统综述。
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 10;16:1495456. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1495456. eCollection 2025.
3
Why workshops work: Examining the efficacy of training trainers to train goats.
工作坊为何有效:审视培训培训师以培训山羊的成效。
Anim Welf. 2023 Nov 21;32:e76. doi: 10.1017/awf.2023.94. eCollection 2023.
4
Automating weighing of faces and voices based on cue saliency in trustworthiness impressions.基于可信度印象中线索显著性对面部和声音进行自动称重。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 16;13(1):20037. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45471-y.
5
Perception of threat and intent to harm from vocal and facial cues.对声音和面部线索的威胁感知和伤害意图。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024 Feb;77(2):326-342. doi: 10.1177/17470218231169952. Epub 2023 May 10.
6
Preterm birth and neonatal white matter microstructure in in-vivo reconstructed fiber tracts among audiovisual integration brain regions.在视听整合脑区的活体重建纤维束中,早产和新生儿脑白质微观结构。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2023 Apr;60:101202. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2023.101202. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
7
Nonverbal Auditory Cues Allow Relationship Quality to be Inferred During Conversations.非语言听觉线索有助于在对话过程中推断人际关系质量。
J Nonverbal Behav. 2022;46(1):1-18. doi: 10.1007/s10919-021-00386-y. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
8
Trait evaluations of faces and voices: Comparing within- and between-person variability.面孔和声音特质评估:比较个体内和个体间的可变性。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Sep;150(9):1854-1869. doi: 10.1037/xge0001019. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
9
Attractiveness and distinctiveness between speakers' voices in naturalistic speech and their faces are uncorrelated.在自然主义言语中,说话者声音之间的吸引力和独特性与他们面部的吸引力和独特性不相关。
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Dec 9;7(12):201244. doi: 10.1098/rsos.201244. eCollection 2020 Dec.
10
Angry, old, male - and trustworthy? How expressive and person voice characteristics shape listener trust.愤怒、年老、男性——且值得信赖?声音特征如何塑造倾听者的信任。
PLoS One. 2020 May 4;15(5):e0232431. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232431. eCollection 2020.