Shawyer Frances, Enticott Joanne C, Brophy Lisa, Bruxner Annie, Fossey Ellie, Inder Brett, Julian John, Kakuma Ritsuko, Weller Penelope, Wilson-Evered Elisabeth, Edan Vrinda, Slade Mike, Meadows Graham N
Southern Synergy, Department of Psychiatry, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Dandenong Hospital, 126 - 128 Cleeland St, Dandenong, Victoria, 3175, Australia.
Royal District Nursing Service Institute, 31 Alma Rd, St Kilda, Victoria, Australia.
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 May 8;17(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1321-3.
Recovery features strongly in Australian mental health policy; however, evidence is limited for the efficacy of recovery-oriented practice at the service level. This paper describes the Principles Unite Local Services Assisting Recovery (PULSAR) Specialist Care trial protocol for a recovery-oriented practice training intervention delivered to specialist mental health services staff. The primary aim is to evaluate whether adult consumers accessing services where staff have received the intervention report superior recovery outcomes compared to adult consumers accessing services where staff have not yet received the intervention. A qualitative sub-study aims to examine staff and consumer views on implementing recovery-oriented practice. A process evaluation sub-study aims to articulate important explanatory variables affecting the interventions rollout and outcomes.
The mixed methods design incorporates a two-step stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial (cRCT) examining cross-sectional data from three phases, and nested qualitative and process evaluation sub-studies. Participating specialist mental health care services in Melbourne, Victoria are divided into 14 clusters with half randomly allocated to receive the staff training in year one and half in year two. Research participants are consumers aged 18-75 years who attended the cluster within a previous three-month period either at baseline, 12 (step 1) or 24 months (step 2). In the two nested sub-studies, participation extends to cluster staff. The primary outcome is the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery collected from 756 consumers (252 each at baseline, step 1, step 2). Secondary and other outcomes measuring well-being, service satisfaction and health economic impact are collected from a subset of 252 consumers (63 at baseline; 126 at step 1; 63 at step 2) via interviews. Interview-based longitudinal data are also collected 12 months apart from 88 consumers with a psychotic disorder diagnosis (44 at baseline, step 1; 44 at step 1, step 2). cRCT data will be analyzed using multilevel mixed-effects modelling to account for clustering and some repeated measures, supplemented by thematic analysis of qualitative interview data. The process evaluation will draw on qualitative, quantitative and documentary data.
Findings will provide an evidence-base for the continued transformation of Australian mental health service frameworks toward recovery.
Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry: ACTRN12614000957695 . Date registered: 8 September 2014.
康复在澳大利亚心理健康政策中占据重要地位;然而,在服务层面以康复为导向的实践效果方面,证据有限。本文介绍了“原则联合地方服务促进康复”(PULSAR)专家护理试验方案,该方案针对心理健康专科服务人员开展以康复为导向的实践培训干预。主要目的是评估与未接受干预的服务机构的成年消费者相比,接受干预的服务机构的成年消费者在康复成果方面是否更优。一项定性子研究旨在调查工作人员和消费者对实施以康复为导向的实践的看法。一项过程评估子研究旨在阐明影响干预措施推广和结果的重要解释变量。
混合方法设计包括一个两步阶梯式楔形整群随机对照试验(cRCT),用于研究三个阶段的横断面数据,以及嵌套的定性和过程评估子研究。维多利亚州墨尔本参与研究的心理健康专科护理服务机构被分为14个群组,其中一半随机分配在第一年接受工作人员培训,另一半在第二年接受培训。研究参与者为年龄在18至75岁之间、在基线期、12个月(第一步)或24个月(第二步)之前三个月内到该群组就诊的消费者。在两项嵌套子研究中,参与范围扩大到群组工作人员。主要结局是从756名消费者(基线期、第一步、第二步各252名)收集的康复过程问卷。通过访谈从252名消费者(基线期63名;第一步126名;第二步63名)子集中收集测量幸福感、服务满意度和健康经济影响的次要结局及其他结局。还从88名患有精神障碍诊断的消费者(基线期、第一步44名;第一步、第二步44名)中每隔12个月收集基于访谈的纵向数据。cRCT数据将使用多水平混合效应模型进行分析,以考虑聚类和一些重复测量,并辅以定性访谈数据的主题分析进行补充。过程评估将利用定性、定量和文献数据。
研究结果将为澳大利亚心理健康服务框架持续向康复转型提供证据基础。
澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册中心:ACTRN12614000957695。注册日期:2014年9月8日。