• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初级保健中精神卫生服务消费者的生活体验同伴支持干预措施评估(PS-PC):一项阶梯式楔形集群随机对照试验的研究方案。

Evaluation of lived experience Peer Support intervention for mental health service consumers in Primary Care (PS-PC): study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.

Lived Experience Australia, PO Box 96, 5048, Brighton, Australia.

出版信息

Trials. 2024 May 14;25(1):319. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08165-y.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-024-08165-y
PMID:38745299
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11094922/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The demand for mental health services in Australia is substantial and has grown beyond the capacity of the current workforce. As a result, it is currently difficult for many to access secondary healthcare providers. Within the secondary healthcare sector, however, peer workers who have lived experience of managing mental health conditions have been increasingly employed to intentionally use their journey of recovery in supporting others living with mental health conditions and their communities. Currently, the presence of peer workers in primary care has been limited, despite the potential benefits of providing supports in conjunction with GPs and secondary healthcare providers.

METHODS

This stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) aims to evaluate a lived experience peer support intervention for accessing mental health care in primary care (PS-PC). Four medical practices across Australia will be randomly allocated to switch from control to intervention, until all practices are delivering the PS-PC intervention. The study will enrol 66 patients at each practice (total sample size of 264). Over a period of 3-4 months, 12 h of practical and emotional support provided by lived experience peer workers will be available to participants. Scale-based questionnaires will inform intervention efficacy in terms of mental health outcomes (e.g., self-efficacy) and other health outcomes (e.g., healthcare-related costs) over four time points. Other perspectives will be explored through scales completed by approximately 150 family members or carers (carer burden) and 16 peer workers (self-efficacy) pre- and post-intervention, and 20 medical practice staff members (attitudes toward peer workers) at the end of each study site's involvement in the intervention. Interviews (n = 60) and six focus groups held toward the end of each study site's involvement will further explore the views of participants, family members or carers, peer workers, and practice staff to better understand the efficacy and acceptability of the intervention.

DISCUSSION

This mixed-methods, multi-centre, stepped-wedge controlled study will be the first to evaluate the implementation of peer workers in the primary care mental health care sector.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ACTRN12623001189617. Registered on 17 November 2023, https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=386715.

摘要

背景

澳大利亚对心理健康服务的需求很大,并且已经超出了当前劳动力的承受能力。因此,许多人现在很难获得二级医疗保健提供者的服务。然而,在二级医疗保健领域,具有管理心理健康状况经验的同行工作者越来越多地被雇佣,以有意利用他们的康复之旅来支持其他患有心理健康状况的人和他们的社区。目前,尽管在与全科医生和二级医疗保健提供者一起提供支持方面具有潜在益处,但同行工作者在初级保健中的存在仍然有限。

方法

这项阶梯式楔形集群随机对照试验(RCT)旨在评估初级保健中同行支持干预措施对获得心理健康护理的影响(PS-PC)。澳大利亚的四家医疗实践将被随机分配从对照组切换到干预组,直到所有实践都提供 PS-PC 干预。每个实践将招募 66 名患者(总样本量为 264 名)。在 3-4 个月的时间内,同行工作者将提供 12 小时的实际和情感支持。量表问卷将在四个时间点上报告干预对心理健康结果(例如自我效能感)和其他健康结果(例如医疗保健相关成本)的疗效。通过大约 150 名家庭成员或照顾者(照顾者负担)和 16 名同行工作者(自我效能感)在干预前后完成的量表,以及每个研究地点结束时的 20 名医疗实践工作人员(对同行工作者的态度),将从其他角度探讨干预的疗效。访谈(n=60)和六个焦点小组将在每个研究地点参与结束时举行,以进一步探讨参与者、家庭成员或照顾者、同行工作者和实践工作人员的观点,以更好地了解干预的疗效和可接受性。

讨论

这项混合方法、多中心、阶梯式楔形对照研究将是第一个评估同行工作者在初级保健心理健康保健部门实施情况的研究。

试验注册

澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心(ANZCTR)ACTRN12623001189617。于 2023 年 11 月 17 日注册,https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=386715。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2f4/11094922/f14f357dd93b/13063_2024_8165_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2f4/11094922/fd547e4d4c13/13063_2024_8165_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2f4/11094922/7bca7adf693a/13063_2024_8165_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2f4/11094922/f14f357dd93b/13063_2024_8165_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2f4/11094922/fd547e4d4c13/13063_2024_8165_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2f4/11094922/7bca7adf693a/13063_2024_8165_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2f4/11094922/f14f357dd93b/13063_2024_8165_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of lived experience Peer Support intervention for mental health service consumers in Primary Care (PS-PC): study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial.初级保健中精神卫生服务消费者的生活体验同伴支持干预措施评估(PS-PC):一项阶梯式楔形集群随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 May 14;25(1):319. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08165-y.
2
A Capacity Building Program to Improve the Self-Efficacy of Key Workers to Support the Well-Being of Parents of a Child With a Disability Accessing an Early Childhood Intervention Service: Protocol for a Stepped-Wedge Design Trial.一项能力建设计划,旨在提高关键工作人员的自我效能,以支持残疾儿童家长在获得幼儿干预服务时的幸福感:阶梯楔形设计试验方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Apr 3;8(4):e12531. doi: 10.2196/12531.
3
The PULSAR primary care protocol: a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial to test a training intervention for general practitioners in recovery-oriented practice to optimize personal recovery in adult patients.脉冲星初级保健方案:一项阶梯楔形整群随机对照试验,旨在测试针对全科医生的以康复为导向的实践培训干预措施,以优化成年患者的个人康复。
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Dec 20;16(1):451. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1153-6.
4
The PULSAR Specialist Care protocol: a stepped-wedge cluster randomized control trial of a training intervention for community mental health teams in recovery-oriented practice.脉冲星专家护理方案:一项针对社区心理健康团队以康复为导向实践的培训干预的阶梯式楔形整群随机对照试验。
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 May 8;17(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1321-3.
5
The CORE study protocol: a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial to test a co-design technique to optimise psychosocial recovery outcomes for people affected by mental illness in the community mental health setting.CORE研究方案:一项阶梯楔形整群随机对照试验,旨在测试一种协同设计技术,以优化社区心理健康环境中受精神疾病影响者的心理社会康复结果。
BMJ Open. 2015 Mar 24;5(3):e006688. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006688.
6
Peer support for people with severe mental illness versus usual care in high-, middle- and low-income countries: study protocol for a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial (UPSIDES-RCT).重度精神疾病患者的同伴支持与中低收入国家的常规护理对比:一项实用、多中心、随机对照试验的研究方案(UPSIDES-RCT)。
Trials. 2020 May 1;21(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4177-7.
7
Web-Based Technologies to Support Carers of People Living With Dementia: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.支持痴呆症患者照料者的基于网络的技术:一项混合方法阶梯式楔形整群随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 May 19;11(5):e33023. doi: 10.2196/33023.
8
Translation of culturally and contextually informed diabetes training for Aboriginal primary health care providers on Aboriginal client outcomes: Protocol of a cluster randomized crossover trial of effectiveness.基于文化和语境的糖尿病培训对原住民初级保健提供者的影响:原住民客户结局的一项群组随机交叉试验的有效性研究方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 23;19(7):e0305472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305472. eCollection 2024.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
The CORE study-An adapted mental health experience codesign intervention to improve psychosocial recovery for people with severe mental illness: A stepped wedge cluster randomized-controlled trial.CORE 研究——一项适应心理健康的经验代码设计干预措施,以改善严重精神疾病患者的心理社会康复:一项阶梯式楔形集群随机对照试验。
Health Expect. 2021 Dec;24(6):1948-1961. doi: 10.1111/hex.13334. Epub 2021 Aug 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Young People's Experiences Using a Digital Mental Health Tool to Support Their Care in a Real-World Service: Lived Experience-Led Qualitative Study.年轻人在现实世界服务中使用数字心理健康工具来支持其护理的经历:基于真实体验的定性研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2025 Jun 23;12:e70154. doi: 10.2196/70154.
2
Exploring practice staffs' perspectives regarding professional roles, confidence, and motivations in delivering mental health care within rural general practice: a qualitative exploration.探索农村全科医疗中实践工作人员在提供精神卫生保健方面的专业角色、信心和动机的看法:定性探索。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Nov 13;25(1):395. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02648-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Guidelines for Reporting Outcomes in Trial Protocols: The SPIRIT-Outcomes 2022 Extension.试验方案中报告结果的指南:SPIRIT-结果2022扩展版
JAMA. 2022 Dec 20;328(23):2345-2356. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.21243.
2
Development of a theory-informed questionnaire to assess the acceptability of healthcare interventions.理论导向型问卷评估医疗干预措施可接受性的开发。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 1;22(1):279. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07577-3.
3
Peer support for discharge from inpatient mental health care versus care as usual in England (ENRICH): a parallel, two-group, individually randomised controlled trial.
英格兰的住院精神卫生保健出院后同伴支持与常规护理的比较(ENRICH):一项平行、两组、个体随机对照试验。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;9(2):125-136. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00398-9.
4
Australian Mental Health Consumers' Experiences of Service Engagement and Disengagement: A Descriptive Study.澳大利亚心理健康消费者参与和不参与服务的体验:描述性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 5;18(19):10464. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910464.
5
Peer support work for people experiencing mental distress attending the emergency department: Exploring the potential.经历精神困扰的人在急诊部接受同伴支持工作:探索其潜力。
Emerg Med Australas. 2022 Feb;34(1):78-84. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13848. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
6
A systematic review and meta-analysis of group peer support interventions for people experiencing mental health conditions.系统评价和荟萃分析团体同伴支持干预对心理健康状况人群的影响。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 23;21(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03321-z.
7
The effectiveness of one-to-one peer support in mental health services: a systematic review and meta-analysis.一对一同伴支持在精神卫生服务中的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 11;20(1):534. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02923-3.
8
The Experiences of Youth Mental Health Peer Workers over Time: A Qualitative Study with Longitudinal Analysis.青少年心理健康同伴工作者随时间的经历:一项纵向分析的定性研究
Community Ment Health J. 2020 Jul;56(5):906-914. doi: 10.1007/s10597-020-00554-2. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
9
Using Peer Support in Developing Empowering Mental Health Services (UPSIDES): Background, Rationale and Methodology.利用同伴支持发展赋权心理健康服务(UPSIDES):背景、基本原理和方法。
Ann Glob Health. 2019 Apr 5;85(1):53. doi: 10.5334/aogh.2435.
10
Randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a peer-delivered self-management intervention to prevent relapse in crisis resolution team users: study protocol.一项由同伴提供的自我管理干预措施预防危机解决团队使用者复发的临床及成本效益随机对照试验:研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 27;7(10):e015665. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015665.