Blom Elma, Boerma Tessel, Bosma Evelyn, Cornips Leonie, Everaert Emma
Special Education: Cognitive & Motor Disabilities, Department of Education & Pedagogy, Utrecht UniversityUtrecht, Netherlands.
Amsterdam Center for Language and CommunicationAmsterdam, Netherlands.
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 21;8:552. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00552. eCollection 2017.
Many studies have shown that bilingual children outperform monolinguals on tasks testing executive functioning, but other studies have not revealed any effect of bilingualism. In this study we compared three groups of bilingual children in the Netherlands, aged 6-7 years, with a monolingual control group. We were specifically interested in testing whether the bilingual cognitive advantage is modulated by the sociolinguistic context of language use. All three bilingual groups were exposed to a minority language besides the nation's dominant language (Dutch). Two bilingual groups were exposed to a regional language (Frisian, Limburgish), and a third bilingual group was exposed to a migrant language (Polish). All children participated in two working memory tasks (verbal, visuospatial) and two attention tasks (selective attention, interference suppression). Bilingual children outperformed monolinguals on selective attention. The cognitive effect of bilingualism was most clearly present in the Frisian-Dutch group and in a subgroup of migrant children who were relatively proficient in Polish. The effect was less robust in the Limburgish-Dutch sample. Investigation of the response patterns of the flanker test, testing interference suppression, suggested that bilingual children more often show an effect of response competition than the monolingual children, demonstrating that bilingual children attend to different aspects of the task than monolingual children. No bilingualism effects emerged for verbal and visuospatial working memory.
许多研究表明,在测试执行功能的任务中,双语儿童的表现优于单语儿童,但其他研究并未发现双语有任何影响。在本研究中,我们将荷兰三组6至7岁的双语儿童与一个单语对照组进行了比较。我们特别感兴趣的是测试双语认知优势是否会受到语言使用的社会语言环境的调节。所有三组双语儿童除了接触本国的主导语言(荷兰语)外,还接触一种少数民族语言。两组双语儿童接触的是地区语言(弗里斯兰语、林堡语),第三组双语儿童接触的是移民语言(波兰语)。所有儿童都参加了两项工作记忆任务(言语、视觉空间)和两项注意力任务(选择性注意、干扰抑制)。在选择性注意方面,双语儿童的表现优于单语儿童。双语的认知效应在弗里斯兰语 - 荷兰语组以及波兰语水平相对较高的移民儿童亚组中最为明显。在林堡语 - 荷兰语样本中,这种效应不太明显。对测试干扰抑制的侧翼测试的反应模式进行调查表明,与单语儿童相比,双语儿童更常表现出反应竞争效应,这表明双语儿童与单语儿童关注任务的不同方面。在言语和视觉空间工作记忆方面未出现双语效应。