Kim Eun-Kyeung, Shin Sujin
Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Cheonan, 31 Soonchunhyang 6th-gil, Cheonan 31151, Republic of Korea.
College of Nursing, Ewha Womans University, 52 Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03760, Republic of Korea.
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Jul;54:64-68. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.04.017. Epub 2017 Apr 30.
Clinical nurses play a vital role in clinical practice education; thus, it is necessary to help clinical nurses have teaching efficacy through the development and application of systematic education programs.
To identify nurses' teaching efficacy for clinical education and analyze the influencing factors of teaching efficacy.
The study used a cross-sectional design. We used a convenience sample of 263 nurses from two hospitals. Teaching efficacy, general characteristics, and perception of clinical practice education were collected via self-reported questionnaires. Teaching efficacy was measured using Hwang's (2006) questionnaire, while perception of clinical practice education was measured using the Clinical Nurse Teacher Survey developed by Nishioka et al. (2014). Participants completed the questionnaire directly. The collected data were then analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-tests, ANOVAs, and multiple regression analysis with PASW Statistics 18.0.
The mean total score of teaching efficacy was 72.5 (range 21-105). The leadership for students subscale had the highest score (3.56±0.59). The factors influencing teaching efficacy were length of clinical career (β=0.26, p<0.001) and perceptions of work satisfaction (β=0.20, p=.005), clinical supervisory relationship (β=0.18, p=.010), and nursing at the hospital ward (β=0.13, p=.029). Altogether, these variables explained 28% of the variance in teaching efficacy in nurses.
Based on these results, nursing educators might need to develop greater confidence in their knowledge and enhance control of their teaching strategies. Nursing schools and hospitals might need to provide greater support and educational opportunities to nurse clinical practice instructors. Furthermore, constructing a system of cooperation between these colleges and educational hospitals, developing programs to enhance teaching efficacy, and identifying the clinical instructor's role are all necessary to promote clinical practice education.
临床护士在临床实践教育中发挥着至关重要的作用;因此,有必要通过制定和应用系统的教育计划来帮助临床护士具备教学效能。
确定护士在临床教育中的教学效能,并分析教学效能的影响因素。
本研究采用横断面设计。我们从两家医院选取了263名护士作为便利样本。通过自填问卷收集教学效能、一般特征以及对临床实践教育的认知。教学效能采用黄(2006年)的问卷进行测量,而对临床实践教育的认知则采用西冈等人(2014年)编制的临床护士教师调查问卷进行测量。参与者直接完成问卷。然后使用PASW Statistics 18.0对收集到的数据进行描述性统计、t检验、方差分析和多元回归分析。
教学效能的平均总分是72.5(范围为21 - 105)。学生领导力子量表得分最高(3.56±0.59)。影响教学效能的因素有临床工作年限(β = 0.26,p < 0.001)、工作满意度认知(β = 0.20,p = 0.005)、临床督导关系(β = 0.18,p = 0.010)以及医院病房护理工作(β = 0.13,p = 0.029)。这些变量共同解释了护士教学效能变异的28%。
基于这些结果,护理教育工作者可能需要对自己的知识更有信心,并加强对教学策略的掌控。护理院校和医院可能需要为护士临床实践指导教师提供更多支持和教育机会。此外,构建这些院校与教学医院之间的合作体系、制定提高教学效能的计划以及明确临床指导教师的角色对于促进临床实践教育都是必要的。