Butcher Robert, Houghton Jo, Derrick Tamsyn, Ramadhani Athumani, Herrera Beatriz, Last Anna R, Massae Patrick A, Burton Matthew J, Holland Martin J, Roberts Chrissy H
Clinical Research Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom.
Clinical Research Department, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom.
J Microbiol Methods. 2017 Aug;139:95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2017.04.010. Epub 2017 May 6.
Trachoma, caused by the intracellular bacterium Chlamydia trachomatis (Ct), is the leading infectious cause of preventable blindness. Many commercial platforms are available that provide highly sensitive and specific detection of Ct DNA. However, the majority of these commercial platforms are inaccessible for population-level surveys in resource-limited settings typical to trachoma control programmes. We developed two low-cost quantitative PCR (qPCR) tests for Ct using readily available reagents on standard real-time thermocyclers.
Each multiplex qPCR test targets one genomic and one plasmid Ct target in addition to an endogenous positive control for Homo sapiens DNA. The quantitative performance of the qPCR assays in clinical samples was determined by comparison to a previously evaluated droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) test. The diagnostic performance of the qPCR assays were evaluated against a commercial assay (artus C. trachomatis Plus RG PCR, Qiagen) using molecular diagnostics quality control standards and clinical samples. We examined the yield of Ct DNA prepared from five different DNA extraction kits and a cold chain-free dry-sample preservation method using swabs spiked with fixed concentrations of human and Ct DNA.
The qPCR assay was highly reproducible (Ct plasmid and genomic targets mean total coefficients of variance 41.5% and 48.3%, respectively). The assay detected 8/8 core specimens upon testing of a quality control panel and performed well in comparison to commercially marketed comparator test (sensitivity and specificity>90%). Optimal extraction and sample preservation methods for research applications were identified.
We describe a pipeline from collection to diagnosis providing the most efficient sample preservation and extraction with significant per test cost savings over a commercial qPCR diagnostic assay. The assay and its evaluation should allow control programs wishing to conduct independent research within the context of trachoma control, access to an affordable test with defined performance characteristics.
由细胞内细菌沙眼衣原体(Ct)引起的沙眼是可预防失明的主要感染性病因。有许多商业平台可用于对Ct DNA进行高度灵敏且特异的检测。然而,在沙眼控制项目典型的资源有限环境中,大多数这些商业平台无法用于人群水平的调查。我们使用标准实时热循环仪上易于获得的试剂开发了两种用于Ct的低成本定量聚合酶链反应(qPCR)检测方法。
每种多重qPCR检测除了针对人类DNA的内源性阳性对照外,还靶向一个基因组Ct靶点和一个质粒Ct靶点。通过与先前评估的液滴数字PCR(ddPCR)检测进行比较,确定qPCR检测在临床样本中的定量性能。使用分子诊断质量控制标准和临床样本,针对商业检测方法(artus沙眼衣原体Plus RG PCR,Qiagen)评估qPCR检测的诊断性能。我们检查了使用固定浓度的人类和Ct DNA加标的拭子从五种不同DNA提取试剂盒制备的Ct DNA产量以及一种无冷链的干样本保存方法。
qPCR检测具有高度可重复性(Ct质粒和基因组靶点的总变异系数均值分别为41.5%和48.3%)。在对质量控制样本进行检测时,该检测方法检测出了8/8个核心样本,并且与市售的对照检测方法相比表现良好(灵敏度和特异性>90%)。确定了适用于研究应用的最佳提取和样本保存方法。
我们描述了一种从样本采集到诊断的流程,可提供最有效的样本保存和提取方法,与商业qPCR诊断检测相比,每次检测成本显著节省。该检测方法及其评估应使希望在沙眼控制背景下开展独立研究的控制项目能够获得具有明确性能特征的经济实惠的检测方法。