• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于年龄和遗传风险的结直肠癌筛查计划降低结直肠癌死亡率的效率比较。

Comparison of the efficiency of colorectal cancer screening programs based on age and genetic risk for reduction of colorectal cancer mortality.

作者信息

Stanesby Oliver, Jenkins Mark

机构信息

Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, Department of Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

出版信息

Eur J Hum Genet. 2017 Jun;25(7):832-838. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2017.60. Epub 2017 May 10.

DOI:10.1038/ejhg.2017.60
PMID:28488675
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5520072/
Abstract

Given that colorectal cancer risk depends partly on inherited factors, screening program efficiency may be increased by incorporating genetic factors. We compared the efficiency of screening based on age and genetic risk in a simulated population. We simulated a population matching the size, age distribution and colorectal cancer incidence and mortality of Australia. We also simulated the distribution of genetic risk for colorectal cancer based on the expected number of inherited risk alleles of 45 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) previously reported as associated with colorectal cancer. We compared the expected colorectal cancer deaths under three screening programs; age-based, genetic-based and combined age-based and genetic-based. The age-based program would prevent 25.4 deaths per 100 000 invited to screen, none of which would be under age 50; the genetic program would prevent 26.2 deaths per 100 000 invited to screen, 16 of which would be under age 50; and the combined program would prevent 24.4 deaths per 100 000 invited to screen, 16 of which would be under age 50. Genetic testing of 1.5 million 45-49 year olds would identify 91% of the people aged under 50 at sufficient risk to warrant screening, potentially saving 16 colorectal cancer deaths each year. Screening eligibility based on genetic risk profile for age is as efficient as eligibility based on age alone for preventing colorectal cancer mortality, but identifies an additional 7% of the population at sufficient risk to benefit from screening who would not normally be screened given they are aged under 50 years.

摘要

鉴于结直肠癌风险部分取决于遗传因素,纳入遗传因素可能会提高筛查项目的效率。我们在一个模拟人群中比较了基于年龄和遗传风险的筛查效率。我们模拟了一个与澳大利亚的规模、年龄分布以及结直肠癌发病率和死亡率相匹配的人群。我们还根据先前报道的与结直肠癌相关的45个单核苷酸多态性(SNP)的遗传风险等位基因预期数量,模拟了结直肠癌的遗传风险分布。我们比较了三种筛查项目下预期的结直肠癌死亡人数;基于年龄的、基于遗传的以及基于年龄和遗传相结合的。基于年龄的项目每10万名受邀筛查者中将预防25.4例死亡,其中没有一例是50岁以下的;基于遗传的项目每10万名受邀筛查者中将预防26.2例死亡,其中16例是50岁以下的;而综合项目每10万名受邀筛查者中将预防24.4例死亡,其中16例是50岁以下的。对150万45 - 49岁的人进行基因检测,将识别出91%的50岁以下具有足够风险值得筛查的人群,每年可能挽救16例结直肠癌死亡病例。基于年龄的遗传风险概况确定筛查资格在预防结直肠癌死亡率方面与仅基于年龄确定资格一样有效,但能识别出另外7%具有足够风险可从筛查中受益的人群,这些人通常因年龄在50岁以下而不会接受筛查。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the efficiency of colorectal cancer screening programs based on age and genetic risk for reduction of colorectal cancer mortality.基于年龄和遗传风险的结直肠癌筛查计划降低结直肠癌死亡率的效率比较。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2017 Jun;25(7):832-838. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2017.60. Epub 2017 May 10.
2
Quantifying the utility of single nucleotide polymorphisms to guide colorectal cancer screening.量化单核苷酸多态性在指导结直肠癌筛查中的效用。
Future Oncol. 2016 Feb;12(4):503-13. doi: 10.2217/fon.15.303. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
3
[Individual screening for colorectal cancer: which strategy for which patient?].[结直肠癌的个体筛查:针对不同患者采用何种策略?]
Rev Med Brux. 2001 Sep;22(4):A203-9.
4
Effect of screening for cancer in the Nordic countries on deaths, cost and quality of life up to the year 2017.北欧国家癌症筛查对截至2017年的死亡、成本和生活质量的影响。
Acta Oncol. 1997;36 Suppl 9:1-60.
5
The National Health Service Bowel Cancer Screening Program: the early years.英国国家医疗服务体系肠癌筛查计划:早期阶段。
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Jul;7(5):421-37. doi: 10.1586/17474124.2013.811045.
6
Long-term effect of faecal occult blood screening on incidence and mortality from colorectal cancer.粪便潜血筛查对结直肠癌发病率和死亡率的长期影响。
Dig Liver Dis. 2014 Dec;46(12):1121-5. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2014.08.041. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
7
Prospects for cancer control: colorectal cancer.癌症控制前景:结直肠癌
N Z Med J. 2005 Aug 26;118(1221):U1632.
8
Screening and surveillance for colorectal cancer.结直肠癌的筛查与监测
Semin Oncol. 1999 Oct;26(5):485-98.
9
Colorectal cancer mortality in two areas of Tuscany with different screening exposures.托斯卡纳两个筛查暴露情况不同地区的结直肠癌死亡率。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Dec 17;100(24):1818-21. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn404. Epub 2008 Dec 9.
10
Colorectal cancer screening using fecal occult blood test and subsequent risk of colorectal cancer: a prospective cohort study in Japan.使用粪便潜血试验进行结直肠癌筛查及随后的结直肠癌风险:日本的一项前瞻性队列研究
Cancer Detect Prev. 2007;31(1):3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.cdp.2006.11.002. Epub 2007 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinically relevant combined effect of polygenic background, rare pathogenic germline variants, and family history on colorectal cancer incidence.多基因背景、罕见种系致病性变异体和家族史对结直肠癌发病的临床相关联合效应。
BMC Med Genomics. 2023 Mar 5;16(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12920-023-01469-z.
2
The SCRIPT trial: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a polygenic risk score to tailor colorectal cancer screening in primary care.SCRIPT 试验:一项针对多基因风险评分的随机对照试验的研究方案,旨在为初级保健中的结直肠癌筛查提供个性化服务。
Trials. 2022 Sep 27;23(1):810. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06734-7.
3
Ability of known colorectal cancer susceptibility SNPs to predict colorectal cancer risk: A cohort study within the UK Biobank.已知结直肠癌易感性 SNPs 预测结直肠癌风险的能力:英国生物库内的队列研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 15;16(9):e0251469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251469. eCollection 2021.
4
The impact of information about different absolute benefits and harms on intention to participate in colorectal cancer screening: A think-aloud study and online randomised experiment.不同绝对获益和危害信息对结直肠癌筛查参与意向的影响:出声思维研究和在线随机对照试验。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 16;16(2):e0246991. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246991. eCollection 2021.
5
Acceptability and potential impact on uptake of using different risk stratification approaches to determine eligibility for screening: A population-based survey.不同风险分层方法用于确定筛查资格的可接受性及其对参与度的潜在影响:一项基于人群的调查。
Health Expect. 2021 Apr;24(2):341-351. doi: 10.1111/hex.13175. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
6
The Impact of a Comprehensive Risk Prediction Model for Colorectal Cancer on a Population Screening Program.一种结直肠癌综合风险预测模型对人群筛查计划的影响。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2020 Jul 18;4(5):pkaa062. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkaa062. eCollection 2020 Oct.
7
MAGI2-AS3 rs7783388 polymorphism contributes to colorectal cancer risk through altering the binding affinity of the transcription factor GR to the MAGI2-AS3 promoter.MAGI2-AS3 rs7783388 多态性通过改变转录因子 GR 与 MAGI2-AS3 启动子的结合亲和力,从而导致结直肠癌风险增加。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2020 Oct;34(10):e23431. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23431. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
8
Determination of the optimal detection time of circulating tumor cells for the postoperative monitoring of colorectal cancer.确定循环肿瘤细胞的最佳检测时间用于结直肠癌术后监测
Oncol Lett. 2020 Apr;19(4):2996-3002. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.11388. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
9
External Validation of Risk Prediction Models Incorporating Common Genetic Variants for Incident Colorectal Cancer Using UK Biobank.利用英国生物库对纳入常见遗传变异的结直肠癌发病风险预测模型进行外部验证。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2020 Jun;13(6):509-520. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-19-0521. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
10
Risk Prediction Models for Colorectal Cancer Incorporating Common Genetic Variants: A Systematic Review.纳入常见遗传变异的结直肠癌风险预测模型:系统评价。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 Oct;28(10):1580-1593. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0059. Epub 2019 Jul 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Modeling the prevention of colorectal cancer from the combined impact of host and behavioral risk factors.基于宿主和行为风险因素的综合影响对结直肠癌预防进行建模。
Genet Med. 2017 Mar;19(3):314-321. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.101. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
2
Do no harm: no psychological harm from colorectal cancer screening.勿施伤害:结直肠癌筛查无心理伤害。
Br J Cancer. 2016 Mar 1;114(5):497-504. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.14. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
3
Quantifying the utility of single nucleotide polymorphisms to guide colorectal cancer screening.量化单核苷酸多态性在指导结直肠癌筛查中的效用。
Future Oncol. 2016 Feb;12(4):503-13. doi: 10.2217/fon.15.303. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
4
Personalized testing based on polygenic risk score is promising for more efficient population-based screening programs for common oncological diseases.基于多基因风险评分的个性化检测对于更高效地开展常见肿瘤疾病的人群筛查项目很有前景。
Ann Oncol. 2016 Mar;27(3):369-70. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw003. Epub 2016 Jan 17.
5
Differences in Colonoscopy Quality Among Facilities: Development of a Post-Colonoscopy Risk-Standardized Rate of Unplanned Hospital Visits.医疗机构间结肠镜检查质量的差异:制定结肠镜检查后风险标准化未计划住院就诊率。
Gastroenterology. 2016 Jan;150(1):103-13. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.09.009. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
6
Colorectal cancer screening: a global overview of existing programmes.结直肠癌筛查:现有项目的全球概览。
Gut. 2015 Oct;64(10):1637-49. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-309086. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
7
Preferences for genetic testing for colorectal cancer within a population-based screening program: a discrete choice experiment.基于人群的筛查项目中结直肠癌基因检测的偏好:一项离散选择实验
Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 Mar;24(3):361-6. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.117. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
8
A model to determine colorectal cancer risk using common genetic susceptibility loci.一种利用常见基因易感性位点来确定结直肠癌风险的模型。
Gastroenterology. 2015 Jun;148(7):1330-9.e14. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.02.010. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
9
Implications of polygenic risk-stratified screening for prostate cancer on overdiagnosis.多基因风险分层筛查前列腺癌对过度诊断的影响。
Genet Med. 2015 Oct;17(10):789-95. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.192. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
10
Impact on colorectal cancer mortality of screening programmes based on the faecal immunochemical test.粪便免疫化学试验为基础的筛查方案对结直肠癌死亡率的影响。
Gut. 2015 May;64(5):784-90. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307508. Epub 2014 Sep 1.