Camiel Lana Dvorkin, Kostka-Rokosz Maria, Tataronis Gary, Goldman Jennifer
Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Boston, Massachusetts.
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 Apr;81(3):47. doi: 10.5688/ajpe81347.
To compare student performance, elements of peer evaluation and satisfaction of teams created according to students' course entrance grade point average (GPA). Two course sections were divided into teams of four to five students utilizing Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness (CATME) software. Of 336 students enrolled, 324 consented to participation. Weekly team quiz averages were 99.1% (higher GPA), 97.2% (lower GPA), 97.7% (mixed GPA). Weekly individual quiz averages were 87.2% (higher GPA), 83.3% (lower GPA), 85.2% (mixed GPA). Students with same GPA performed similarly individually independent of team assignment. Satisfaction ranged from 4.52 (higher GPA), 4.73 (lower GPA), 4.53 (mixed GPA). Academically stronger students in mixed GPA teams appeared to be at a slight disadvantage compared to similar students in higher GPA teams. There was no difference in team performance for academically weaker students in lower GPA versus mixed GPA teams. Team satisfaction was higher in lower GPA teams.
为比较学生表现,根据学生课程入学平均绩点(GPA)进行同伴评估和团队满意度分析。两个课程班级利用团队成员有效性综合评估(CATME)软件分成四到五人的小组。在336名注册学生中,324名同意参与。每周团队测验平均分分别为99.1%(高GPA)、97.2%(低GPA)、97.7%(混合GPA)。每周个人测验平均分分别为87.2%(高GPA)、83.3%(低GPA)、85.2%(混合GPA)。具有相同GPA的学生,无论团队分配如何,个人表现相似。满意度评分分别为4.52(高GPA)、4.73(低GPA)、4.53(混合GPA)。与高GPA团队中的类似学生相比,混合GPA团队中学术能力较强的学生似乎略有劣势。低GPA团队与混合GPA团队中学术能力较弱的学生在团队表现上没有差异。低GPA团队的团队满意度更高。