• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巢式病例对照研究设计分析:重新审视逆概率加权法

Analysis of Nested Case-Control Study Designs: Revisiting the Inverse Probability Weighting Method.

作者信息

Kim Ryung S

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine.

出版信息

Commun Stat Appl Methods. 2013 Nov;20(6):455-466. doi: 10.5351/CSAM.2013.20.6.455.

DOI:10.5351/CSAM.2013.20.6.455
PMID:28503512
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5426119/
Abstract

In nested case-control studies, the most common way to make inference under a proportional hazards model is the conditional logistic approach of Thomas (1977). Inclusion probability methods are more efficient than the conditional logistic approach of Thomas; however, the epidemiology research community has not accepted the methods as a replacement of the Thomas' method. This paper promotes the inverse probability weighting method originally proposed by Samuelsen (1997) in combination with an approximate jackknife standard error that can be easily computed using existing software. Simulation studies demonstrate that this approach yields valid type 1 errors and greater powers than the conditional logistic approach in nested case-control designs across various sample sizes and magnitudes of the hazard ratios. A generalization of the method is also made to incorporate additional matching and the stratified Cox model. The proposed method is illustrated with data from a cohort of children with Wilm's tumor to study the association between histological signatures and relapses.

摘要

在巢式病例对照研究中,在比例风险模型下进行推断的最常见方法是托马斯(1977年)提出的条件逻辑回归方法。包含概率方法比托马斯的条件逻辑回归方法更有效;然而,流行病学研究界尚未接受这些方法来替代托马斯方法。本文推广了萨缪尔森(1997年)最初提出的逆概率加权方法,并结合了一种近似刀切法标准误差,该误差可使用现有软件轻松计算。模拟研究表明,在各种样本量和风险比大小的巢式病例对照设计中,该方法产生的一类错误有效,且比条件逻辑回归方法具有更大的检验效能。该方法还进行了推广,以纳入额外的匹配和分层Cox模型。本文用一组患威尔姆斯瘤儿童的数据说明了所提出的方法,以研究组织学特征与复发之间的关联。

相似文献

1
Analysis of Nested Case-Control Study Designs: Revisiting the Inverse Probability Weighting Method.巢式病例对照研究设计分析:重新审视逆概率加权法
Commun Stat Appl Methods. 2013 Nov;20(6):455-466. doi: 10.5351/CSAM.2013.20.6.455.
2
A new comparison of nested case-control and case-cohort designs and methods.嵌套病例对照研究与病例队列研究设计及方法的新比较。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2015 Mar;30(3):197-207. doi: 10.1007/s10654-014-9974-4. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
3
Analysis of secondary outcomes in nested case-control study designs.巢式病例对照研究设计中的次要结局分析。
Stat Med. 2014 Oct 30;33(24):4215-26. doi: 10.1002/sim.6231. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
4
Nested case-control sampling without replacement.巢式病例对照研究(无置换)。
Lifetime Data Anal. 2024 Oct;30(4):776-799. doi: 10.1007/s10985-024-09633-y. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
5
Inverse probability weighting in nested case-control studies with additional matching--a simulation study.具有额外匹配的巢式病例对照研究中的逆概率加权——一项模拟研究
Stat Med. 2013 Dec 30;32(30):5328-39. doi: 10.1002/sim.6019. Epub 2013 Oct 17.
6
Resampling Procedures for Making Inference under Nested Case-control Studies.嵌套病例对照研究中进行推断的重采样程序。
J Am Stat Assoc. 2013 Jan 1;108(504):1532-1544. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2013.856715.
7
Nested case-control data analysis using weighted conditional logistic regression in The Environmental Determinants of Diabetes in the Young (TEDDY) study: A novel approach.嵌套病例对照数据采用加权条件逻辑回归分析在儿童期糖尿病的环境决定因素研究(TEDDY):一种新方法。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2020 Jan;36(1):e3204. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3204. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
8
Nested case-control studies: should one break the matching?巢式病例对照研究:是否应该打破匹配?
Lifetime Data Anal. 2015 Oct;21(4):517-41. doi: 10.1007/s10985-015-9319-y. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
9
New weighting methods when cases are only a subset of events in a nested case-control study.当病例只是嵌套病例对照研究中事件的一个子集时的新加权方法。
Biom J. 2022 Oct;64(7):1240-1259. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202100194. Epub 2022 Jun 26.
10
Generalized mean residual life models for case-cohort and nested case-control studies.病例-队列和巢式病例对照研究的广义平均剩余寿命模型。
Lifetime Data Anal. 2020 Oct;26(4):789-819. doi: 10.1007/s10985-020-09499-w. Epub 2020 Jun 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Weighted metrics are required when evaluating the performance of prediction models in nested case-control studies.在嵌套病例对照研究中评估预测模型的性能时,需要使用加权指标。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 May 17;24(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02213-6.
2
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) exposure and thyroid cancer risk.全氟和多氟烷基物质 (PFAS) 暴露与甲状腺癌风险。
EBioMedicine. 2023 Nov;97:104831. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104831. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
3
Methylation at CpG sites related to growth differentiation factor-15 was not prospectively associated with cardiovascular death in discordant monozygotic twins.CpG 位点甲基化与生长分化因子-15 相关,但在不一致的同卵双胞胎中与心血管死亡无前瞻性关联。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 15;12(1):4410. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08369-9.
4
Carbon Monoxide Poisoning and Developing Ischemic Heart Disease: A Nationwide Population-Based Nested Case-Control Study.一氧化碳中毒与缺血性心脏病的发生:一项基于全国人口的巢式病例对照研究。
Toxics. 2021 Sep 28;9(10):239. doi: 10.3390/toxics9100239.
5
Whole-Genome Differentially Hydroxymethylated DNA Regions among Twins Discordant for Cardiovascular Death.双胞胎中发生心血管死亡的个体间全基因组差异羟甲基化 DNA 区域。
Genes (Basel). 2021 Jul 29;12(8):1183. doi: 10.3390/genes12081183.
6
Catalonia Suicide Risk Code Epidemiology (CSRC-Epi) study: protocol for a population-representative nested case-control study of suicide attempts in Catalonia, Spain.加泰罗尼亚自杀风险代码流行病学(CSRC-Epi)研究:西班牙加泰罗尼亚地区自杀未遂的人群代表性巢式病例对照研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 12;10(7):e037365. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037365.
7
Estimation of Relative and Absolute Risks in a Competing-Risks Setting Using a Nested Case-Control Study Design: Example From the ProMort Study.在竞争风险环境下使用嵌套病例对照研究设计估计相对和绝对风险:来自 ProMort 研究的实例。
Am J Epidemiol. 2019 Jun 1;188(6):1165-1173. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwz026.
8
A new comparison of nested case-control and case-cohort designs and methods.嵌套病例对照研究与病例队列研究设计及方法的新比较。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2015 Mar;30(3):197-207. doi: 10.1007/s10654-014-9974-4. Epub 2014 Dec 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Case-control studies = odds ratios: blame the retrospective model.病例对照研究 = 比值比:归咎于回顾性模型。
Epidemiology. 2010 Jan;21(1):10-2. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181c308f5.
2
Comparison between single-dose and divided-dose administration of dactinomycin and doxorubicin for patients with Wilms' tumor: a report from the National Wilms' Tumor Study Group.放线菌素D和阿霉素单剂量与分剂量给药治疗肾母细胞瘤患者的比较:来自国家肾母细胞瘤研究组的报告
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jan;16(1):237-45. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.1.237.
3
Nonparametric estimation of relative mortality from nested case-control studies.巢式病例对照研究中相对死亡率的非参数估计
Biometrics. 1993 Jun;49(2):593-602.
4
Robust variance estimation for the case-cohort design.病例队列设计的稳健方差估计
Biometrics. 1994 Dec;50(4):1064-72.
5
Treatment of Wilms' tumor. Results of the Third National Wilms' Tumor Study.肾母细胞瘤的治疗。第三次全国肾母细胞瘤研究结果。
Cancer. 1989 Jul 15;64(2):349-60. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19890715)64:2<349::aid-cncr2820640202>3.0.co;2-q.
6
Histopathology and prognosis of Wilms tumors: results from the First National Wilms' Tumor Study.肾母细胞瘤的组织病理学与预后:来自首次全国肾母细胞瘤研究的结果。
Cancer. 1978 May;41(5):1937-48. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197805)41:5<1937::aid-cncr2820410538>3.0.co;2-u.