• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从 DSM-5 特质推导 ICD-11 人格障碍领域:协调两个诊断系统的初步尝试。

Deriving ICD-11 personality disorder domains from dsm-5 traits: initial attempt to harmonize two diagnostic systems.

机构信息

Center of Excellence on Personality Disorder, Psychiatric Research Unit, Psychiatric Hospital Slagelse, Slagelse, Denmark.

University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2017 Jul;136(1):108-117. doi: 10.1111/acps.12748. Epub 2017 May 15.

DOI:10.1111/acps.12748
PMID:28504853
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The personality disorder domains proposed for the ICD-11 comprise Negative Affectivity, Detachment, Dissociality, Disinhibition, and Anankastia, which are reasonably concordant with the higher-order trait domains in the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders.

METHOD

We examined (i) whether designated DSM-5 trait facets can be used to describe the proposed ICD-11 trait domains, and (ii) how these ICD-11 trait features are hierarchically organized. A mixed Danish derivation sample (N = 1541) of 615 psychiatric out-patients and 925 community participants along with a US replication sample (N = 637) completed the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). Sixteen PID-5 traits were designated to cover features of the ICD-11 trait domains.

RESULTS

Exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) analyzes showed that the designated traits were meaningfully organized in the proposed ICD-11 five-domain structure as well as other recognizable higher-order models of personality and psychopathology. Model fits revealed that the five proposed ICD-11 personality disorder domains were satisfactorily resembled, and replicated in the independent US sample.

CONCLUSION

The proposed ICD-11 personality disorder domains can be accurately described using designated traits from the DSM-5 personality trait system. A scoring algorithm for the ICD-11 personality disorder domains is provided in appendix.

摘要

目的

ICD-11 提出的人格障碍领域包括负性情绪、超脱、反社会、冲动和强迫,这些与替代 DSM-5 人格障碍模型中的高阶特质领域相当一致。

方法

我们检验了(i)DSM-5 特质方面是否可以用于描述 ICD-11 特质领域,以及(ii)这些 ICD-11 特质特征是如何分层组织的。一个由丹麦的 615 名精神科门诊患者和 925 名社区参与者组成的混合样本(N=1541),以及一个美国复制样本(N=637)完成了 DSM-5 人格量表(PID-5)。16 个 PID-5 特质被指定用于涵盖 ICD-11 特质领域的特征。

结果

探索性结构方程模型(ESEM)分析表明,指定的特质在提议的 ICD-11 五领域结构中以及其他可识别的人格和精神病理学高阶模型中具有有意义的组织。模型拟合表明,五个提议的 ICD-11 人格障碍领域得到了令人满意的模拟,并在独立的美国样本中得到了复制。

结论

可以使用 DSM-5 人格特质系统中的指定特质准确描述提议的 ICD-11 人格障碍领域。在附录中提供了 ICD-11 人格障碍领域的评分算法。

相似文献

1
Deriving ICD-11 personality disorder domains from dsm-5 traits: initial attempt to harmonize two diagnostic systems.从 DSM-5 特质推导 ICD-11 人格障碍领域:协调两个诊断系统的初步尝试。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2017 Jul;136(1):108-117. doi: 10.1111/acps.12748. Epub 2017 May 15.
2
ICD-11 and DSM-5 personality trait domains capture categorical personality disorders: Finding a common ground.《ICD-11 和 DSM-5 人格特质领域能否涵盖类别性人格障碍:寻找共同点》
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2018 May;52(5):425-434. doi: 10.1177/0004867417727867. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
3
Structure of DSM-5 and ICD-11 personality domains in Iranian community sample.DSM-5 和 ICD-11 人格领域在伊朗社区样本中的结构。
Personal Ment Health. 2018 May;12(2):155-169. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1409. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
4
Evaluation of DSM-5 and ICD-11 personality traits using the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) in a Brazilian sample of psychiatric inpatients.使用 DSM-5 人格量表(PID-5)在巴西精神科住院患者样本中评估 DSM-5 和 ICD-11 人格特质。
Personal Ment Health. 2019 Feb;13(1):24-39. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1436. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
5
Structure of clinician-reported ICD-11 personality disorder trait qualifiers.临床医生报告的 ICD-11 人格障碍特质修饰语的结构。
Psychol Assess. 2020 Jan;32(1):50-59. doi: 10.1037/pas0000747. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
6
Validation of Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) algorithms to assess ICD-11 personality trait domains in a psychiatric sample.验证《精神障碍诊断与统计手册第五版人格量表》(PID-5)算法在精神科样本中评估《国际疾病分类第 11 版》人格特质领域的适用性。
Psychol Assess. 2020 Jan;32(1):40-49. doi: 10.1037/pas0000746. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
7
International Assessment of DSM-5 and ICD-11 Personality Disorder Traits: Toward a Common Nosology in DSM-5.1.DSM-5 和 ICD-11 人格障碍特征的国际评估:迈向 DSM-5.1 中的共同分类学。
Psychopathology. 2020;53(3-4):179-188. doi: 10.1159/000507589. Epub 2020 May 5.
8
General and maladaptive traits in a five-factor framework for DSM-5 in a university student sample.DSM-5 五因素框架中大学生样本的一般和适应不良特征。
Assessment. 2013 Jun;20(3):295-307. doi: 10.1177/1073191113475808. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
9
The convergent structure of DSM-5 personality trait facets and five-factor model trait domains.DSM-5 人格特质方面的聚合结构与五因素模型特质领域。
Assessment. 2013 Jun;20(3):308-11. doi: 10.1177/1073191112457589. Epub 2012 Sep 3.
10
Evaluation of a 36-item measure of ICD-11 and DSM-5 personality disorder trait domains and facets in Russian inpatients.对俄罗斯住院患者中一份关于国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)和精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版(DSM - 5)人格障碍特质领域及方面的36项测量工具的评估。
Psychol Assess. 2023 May;35(5):e22-e30. doi: 10.1037/pas0001223. Epub 2023 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Personality Disorder Severity-ICD-11 Scale and CPTSD ICD-11 Scale: examining possible psychometric properties and diagnostic concept overlap.人格障碍严重程度-国际疾病分类第11版量表与复杂创伤后应激障碍国际疾病分类第11版量表:探究可能的心理测量特性和诊断概念重叠情况。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2541472. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2541472. Epub 2025 Sep 4.
2
Screening for psychotherapy readiness with the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment Scale and the Readiness for Psychotherapy Index.使用罗德岛大学改变评估量表和心理治疗准备指数筛查心理治疗准备情况。
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 12;16:1530713. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1530713. eCollection 2025.
3
Validation of the Polish Self and Interpersonal Functioning Scale (SIFS-PL) in community and clinical samples.
波兰自我与人际功能量表(SIFS-PL)在社区和临床样本中的效度验证。
Curr Issues Personal Psychol. 2025 Jan 9;13(2):138-147. doi: 10.5114/cipp/194231. eCollection 2025.
4
A Meta-Analysis of the Structural Validity of Original and Brief Versions of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 in Iran.伊朗版《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版人格量表原始版与简版结构效度的Meta分析
Iran J Psychiatry. 2025 Jan;20(1):126-141. doi: 10.18502/ijps.v20i1.17406.
5
Severity Benchmarks for the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Brief Form 2.0 (LPFS-BF 2.0) in Polish Adults.波兰成年人个性功能量表简版2.0(LPFS-BF 2.0)水平的严重程度基准。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Feb 6;13(3):340. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13030340.
6
Practical implications of ICD-11 personality disorder classifications.ICD-11 人格障碍分类的实际影响。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 7;24(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05640-3.
7
Impaired Personality Functioning in Children and Adolescents Assessed with the in Parent-Report and Convergence with Maladaptive Personality Traits and Personality Structure in School and Clinic Samples.父母报告中评估的儿童和青少年人格功能受损以及与学校和临床样本中适应不良人格特质和人格结构的趋同情况
Children (Basel). 2023 Jul 8;10(7):1186. doi: 10.3390/children10071186.
8
Operational definitions and measurement of externalizing behavior problems: An integrative review including research models and clinical diagnostic systems.外化行为问题的操作定义与测量:一项综合综述,涵盖研究模型与临床诊断系统
World J Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 19;13(6):278-297. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v13.i6.278.
9
Analysis of the Relationship between Higher-Order Factor Structure of Personality Disorders and the Five-Factor Model of Personality.人格障碍的高阶因素结构与人格五因素模型之间的关系分析
Brain Sci. 2023 Apr 3;13(4):605. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13040605.
10
Cross-walking personality disorder types to ICD-11 trait domains: An overview of current findings.将人格障碍类型与《国际疾病分类第11版》(ICD - 11)特质领域进行交叉对照:当前研究结果概述
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 6;14:1175425. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1175425. eCollection 2023.