• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用 DSM-5 人格量表(PID-5)在巴西精神科住院患者样本中评估 DSM-5 和 ICD-11 人格特质。

Evaluation of DSM-5 and ICD-11 personality traits using the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) in a Brazilian sample of psychiatric inpatients.

机构信息

Núcleo de Formação Específica em Neurociências da Escola de Medicina da Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

Departamento de Psicologia Clínica - Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Brasília, DF, Brazil.

出版信息

Personal Ment Health. 2019 Feb;13(1):24-39. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1436. Epub 2018 Oct 24.

DOI:10.1002/pmh.1436
PMID:30353698
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to test if the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) is an adequate instrument to evaluate psychiatric inpatients' pathological personality traits.

METHODS

Inpatients (n = 130; mean age: 38.5 years; 62.3% female; 63.9% single) answered the PID-5 after clinical improvement of their psychiatric symptoms. The mean scores of the DSM-5 personality domains, facets and profiles, and ICD-11 domain traits were compared with the mean scores of a Brazilian normative sample (n = 656). We investigated the diagnostic performance of the scales to identify individuals with and without psychopathology.

RESULTS

The final sample included mainly diagnoses of mood disorders. Except for Antagonism and Disinhibition, all DSM-5 personality domains and most facets as well as almost all DSM-5 personality disorder profiles (except Narcissist) and ICD-11 trait domains (except Detachment and Dissociality) of the inpatients presented high differences compared with the normative sample. In general, the PID-5 scales presented a high negative predictive value and a low positive predictive value to identify individuals with severe psychopathology.

DISCUSSION

This study found high scores of pathological personality traits in a sample of Brazilian psychiatric inpatients. The PID-5 may be a promising instrument to measure pathological personality traits among psychiatric inpatients. Methodological and sample size limitations may have influenced the results. © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在检验 DSM-5 人格量表(PID-5)是否能够充分评估精神科住院患者的病理性人格特征。

方法

在精神症状得到临床改善后,住院患者(n=130;平均年龄:38.5 岁;62.3%为女性;63.9%为单身)回答了 PID-5。DSM-5 人格领域、方面和特征以及 ICD-11 领域特征的平均分数与巴西常模样本(n=656)的平均分数进行了比较。我们调查了这些量表识别有和无精神病理学个体的诊断性能。

结果

最终样本主要包括心境障碍诊断。除了对立和冲动控制障碍外,住院患者的所有 DSM-5 人格领域和大多数方面以及几乎所有 DSM-5 人格障碍特征(除自恋者)和 ICD-11 特征领域(除疏离和反社会)与常模样本相比都存在较大差异。总体而言,PID-5 量表对识别严重精神病理学个体具有较高的阴性预测值和较低的阳性预测值。

讨论

本研究在巴西精神病住院患者样本中发现了高水平的病理性人格特征。PID-5 可能是评估精神科住院患者病理性人格特征的一种有前途的工具。方法学和样本量的限制可能影响了结果。© 2018 约翰威立父子公司

相似文献

1
Evaluation of DSM-5 and ICD-11 personality traits using the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) in a Brazilian sample of psychiatric inpatients.使用 DSM-5 人格量表(PID-5)在巴西精神科住院患者样本中评估 DSM-5 和 ICD-11 人格特质。
Personal Ment Health. 2019 Feb;13(1):24-39. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1436. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
2
A Family Study of the Section III Personality Pathology Model Using the Personality Inventory for the (PID-5).采用《人格障碍检查表第五版》(PID-5)对 第三节人格病理学模型进行的家系研究。
J Pers Disord. 2018 Dec;32(6):753-765. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2017_31_323. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
3
Deriving ICD-11 personality disorder domains from dsm-5 traits: initial attempt to harmonize two diagnostic systems.从 DSM-5 特质推导 ICD-11 人格障碍领域:协调两个诊断系统的初步尝试。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2017 Jul;136(1):108-117. doi: 10.1111/acps.12748. Epub 2017 May 15.
4
ICD-11 and DSM-5 personality trait domains capture categorical personality disorders: Finding a common ground.《ICD-11 和 DSM-5 人格特质领域能否涵盖类别性人格障碍:寻找共同点》
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2018 May;52(5):425-434. doi: 10.1177/0004867417727867. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
5
Examining the relations among the DSM-5 alternative model of personality, the five-factor model, and externalizing and internalizing behavior.探讨 DSM-5 人格替代模型、五因素模型以及外显和内隐行为之间的关系。
Personal Disord. 2018 Jul;9(4):379-384. doi: 10.1037/per0000240. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
6
The Portuguese version of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 in a community and a clinical sample.DSM-5 人格问卷的葡萄牙文版在社区和临床样本中的应用。
Personal Ment Health. 2019 Feb;13(1):40-52. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1437. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
7
Validation of Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) algorithms to assess ICD-11 personality trait domains in a psychiatric sample.验证《精神障碍诊断与统计手册第五版人格量表》(PID-5)算法在精神科样本中评估《国际疾病分类第 11 版》人格特质领域的适用性。
Psychol Assess. 2020 Jan;32(1):40-49. doi: 10.1037/pas0000746. Epub 2019 Jun 17.
8
Reliability and clinical usefulness of the personality inventory for DSM-5 in clinically referred adolescents: A preliminary report in a sample of Italian inpatients.DSM-5 人格问卷在临床转诊青少年中的信度和临床实用性:意大利住院患者样本的初步报告。
Compr Psychiatry. 2016 Oct;70:141-51. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
9
The alternative DSM-5 personality disorder traits criterion: A comparative examination of three self-report forms in a Danish population.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版人格障碍特质替代标准:丹麦人群中三种自我报告形式的比较研究
Personal Disord. 2016 Apr;7(2):124-35. doi: 10.1037/per0000162. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
10
Translation and cultural adaptation of the DSM-5 Personality Inventory - Brief Form (PID-5-BF).DSM-5 人格障碍简明量表(PID-5-BF)的翻译与文化调适。
Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2020 Oct-Dec;42(4):291-301. doi: 10.1590/2237-6089-2019-0073.

引用本文的文献

1
Practical implications of ICD-11 personality disorder classifications.ICD-11 人格障碍分类的实际影响。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 7;24(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05640-3.
2
Cross-walking personality disorder types to ICD-11 trait domains: An overview of current findings.将人格障碍类型与《国际疾病分类第11版》(ICD - 11)特质领域进行交叉对照:当前研究结果概述
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Apr 6;14:1175425. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1175425. eCollection 2023.
3
Dimensional models of personality disorders: Challenges and opportunities.人格障碍的维度模型:挑战与机遇。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 7;14:1098452. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1098452. eCollection 2023.
4
Clinical Implications of ICD-11 for Diagnosing and Treating Personality Disorders.《ICD-11 对人格障碍诊断和治疗的临床意义》
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2022 Oct;24(10):553-563. doi: 10.1007/s11920-022-01364-x. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
5
Preliminary Scales for Personality Disorder: Self and Interpersonal Dysfunction Plus Five Personality Disorder Trait Domains.人格障碍初步量表:自我与人际功能障碍加五个人格障碍特质领域
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 12;12:668724. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.668724. eCollection 2021.
6
ICD-11 Personality Disorders: Utility and Implications of the New Model.《国际疾病分类第11版》中的人格障碍:新模式的效用与影响
Front Psychiatry. 2021 May 10;12:655548. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.655548. eCollection 2021.
7
The ICD-11 Personality Disorder Trait Model Fits the Kurdish Population Better Than the DSM-5 Trait Model.国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)人格障碍特质模型比精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版(DSM - 5)特质模型更适合库尔德人群。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 30;12:635813. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.635813. eCollection 2021.
8
Personality inventory for DSM-5 brief form(PID-5-BF) in Chinese students and patients: evaluating the five-factor model and a culturally informed six-factor model.中文学生和患者的 DSM-5 简短形式人格量表(PID-5-BF):评估五因素模型和具有文化意义的六因素模型。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 17;21(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03080-x.
9
Translation and cultural adaptation of the DSM-5 Personality Inventory - Brief Form (PID-5-BF).DSM-5 人格障碍简明量表(PID-5-BF)的翻译与文化调适。
Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2020 Oct-Dec;42(4):291-301. doi: 10.1590/2237-6089-2019-0073.
10
Characterizing DSM-5 and ICD-11 personality disorder features in psychiatric inpatients at scale using electronic health records.采用电子健康记录大规模描述精神科住院患者的 DSM-5 和 ICD-11 人格障碍特征。
Psychol Med. 2020 Oct;50(13):2221-2229. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719002320. Epub 2019 Sep 23.