• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巨噬细胞对非洲刺毛鼠的形态再生至关重要。

Macrophages are necessary for epimorphic regeneration in African spiny mice.

作者信息

Simkin Jennifer, Gawriluk Thomas R, Gensel John C, Seifert Ashley W

机构信息

Department of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, United States.

Department of Physiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, United States.

出版信息

Elife. 2017 May 16;6:e24623. doi: 10.7554/eLife.24623.

DOI:10.7554/eLife.24623
PMID:28508748
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5433844/
Abstract

How the immune system affects tissue regeneration is not well understood. In this study, we used an emerging mammalian model of epimorphic regeneration, the African spiny mouse, to examine cell-based inflammation and tested the hypothesis that macrophages are necessary for regeneration. By directly comparing inflammatory cell activation in a 4 mm ear injury during regeneration () and scarring (), we found that both species exhibited an acute inflammatory response, with scarring characterized by stronger myeloperoxidase activity. In contrast, ROS production was stronger and more persistent during regeneration. By depleting macrophages during injury, we demonstrate a functional requirement for these cells to stimulate regeneration. Importantly, the spatial distribution of activated macrophage subtypes was unique during regeneration with pro-inflammatory macrophages failing to infiltrate the regeneration blastema. Together, our results demonstrate an essential role for inflammatory cells to regulate a regenerative response.

摘要

免疫系统如何影响组织再生尚未得到充分理解。在本研究中,我们使用了一种新兴的形态再生哺乳动物模型——非洲刺毛鼠,来研究基于细胞的炎症,并测试巨噬细胞对再生是否必要这一假设。通过直接比较再生()和瘢痕形成()过程中4毫米耳部损伤时的炎性细胞激活情况,我们发现两个物种均表现出急性炎症反应,瘢痕形成的特征是髓过氧化物酶活性更强。相比之下,再生过程中活性氧的产生更强且更持久。通过在损伤期间清除巨噬细胞,我们证明了这些细胞对刺激再生的功能需求。重要的是,再生过程中活化巨噬细胞亚型的空间分布是独特的,促炎巨噬细胞无法浸润再生芽基。总之,我们的结果证明了炎性细胞在调节再生反应中起着至关重要的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/672a/5433844/255a6f6b1a68/elife-24623-fig6-figsupp2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/672a/5433844/21d42f2b18ed/elife-24623-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/672a/5433844/031e29d3c9d7/elife-24623-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/672a/5433844/3c87457e2786/elife-24623-fig2-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/672a/5433844/ef403a72a90a/elife-24623-fig2-figsupp2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/672a/5433844/1bf802515158/elife-24623-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/672a/5433844/a9115ca42afd/elife-24623-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/672a/5433844/e97066c14d0e/elife-24623-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/672a/5433844/6db7d4cff548/elife-24623-fig5-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/672a/5433844/2a8757a5f129/elife-24623-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/672a/5433844/e8f571616fee/elife-24623-fig6-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/672a/5433844/255a6f6b1a68/elife-24623-fig6-figsupp2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/672a/5433844/21d42f2b18ed/elife-24623-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/672a/5433844/031e29d3c9d7/elife-24623-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/672a/5433844/3c87457e2786/elife-24623-fig2-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/672a/5433844/ef403a72a90a/elife-24623-fig2-figsupp2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/672a/5433844/1bf802515158/elife-24623-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/672a/5433844/a9115ca42afd/elife-24623-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/672a/5433844/e97066c14d0e/elife-24623-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/672a/5433844/6db7d4cff548/elife-24623-fig5-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/672a/5433844/2a8757a5f129/elife-24623-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/672a/5433844/e8f571616fee/elife-24623-fig6-figsupp1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/672a/5433844/255a6f6b1a68/elife-24623-fig6-figsupp2.jpg

相似文献

1
Macrophages are necessary for epimorphic regeneration in African spiny mice.巨噬细胞对非洲刺毛鼠的形态再生至关重要。
Elife. 2017 May 16;6:e24623. doi: 10.7554/eLife.24623.
2
Comparative analysis of ear-hole closure identifies epimorphic regeneration as a discrete trait in mammals.耳孔封闭的比较分析表明,后生性再生是哺乳动物的一个离散特征。
Nat Commun. 2016 Apr 25;7:11164. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11164.
3
Tissue-resident macrophages specifically express Lactotransferrin and Vegfc during ear pinna regeneration in spiny mice.组织驻留巨噬细胞在刺鼠耳郭再生过程中特异性表达乳铁蛋白和 Vegfc。
Dev Cell. 2024 Feb 26;59(4):496-516.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2023.12.017. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
4
Optimal skin regeneration after full thickness thermal burn injury in the spiny mouse, Acomys cahirinus.刺毛鼠(Acomys cahirinus)全层热烧伤后皮肤的最佳再生。
Burns. 2018 Sep;44(6):1509-1520. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.05.018. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
5
Older spiny mice (Acomys cahirinus) have delayed and spatially heterogenous ear wound regeneration.老年刺毛鼠(Acomys cahirinus)的耳朵创伤再生具有延迟性和空间异质性。
Biol Open. 2024 Jul 15;13(10). doi: 10.1242/bio.060565. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
6
Comparative regenerative biology of spiny (Acomys cahirinus) and laboratory (Mus musculus) mouse skin.刺毛鼠(Acomys cahirinus)和实验室鼠(Mus musculus)皮肤的比较再生生物学。
Exp Dermatol. 2019 Apr;28(4):442-449. doi: 10.1111/exd.13899.
7
Coronal brain atlas in stereotaxic coordinates of the African spiny mouse, Acomys cahirinus.非洲刺毛鼠的冠状脑图谱,以立体定向坐标表示。
J Comp Neurol. 2022 Aug;530(12):2215-2237. doi: 10.1002/cne.25329. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
8
Comparative Proteomic Analysis in Scar-Free Skin Regeneration in Acomys cahirinus and Scarring Mus musculus.无瘢痕皮肤再生的 Acomys cahirinus 和 Mus musculus 的比较蛋白质组学分析。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 13;10(1):166. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56823-y.
9
Model systems for regeneration: the spiny mouse, .再生模型系统:棘鼠。
Development. 2020 Feb 25;147(4):dev167718. doi: 10.1242/dev.167718.
10
Perfect chronic skeletal muscle regeneration in adult spiny mice, Acomys cahirinus.成年沙鼠(Acomys cahirinus)中完美的慢性骨骼肌肉再生。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 11;8(1):8920. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27178-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Acomys cahirinus develop lung stroma distortion but not fibrosis after bleomycin-induced injury.埃及刺毛鼠在博来霉素诱导损伤后会出现肺基质变形,但不会出现纤维化。
Inflamm Regen. 2025 Aug 29;45(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s41232-025-00391-4.
2
Prx1 progenitors give rise to new articular cartilage when conditions are permissive for endogenous regeneration.当条件允许内源性再生时,Prx1祖细胞可产生新的关节软骨。
NPJ Regen Med. 2025 Aug 9;10(1):38. doi: 10.1038/s41536-025-00425-y.
3
Early-age efferocytosis directs macrophage arachidonic acid metabolism for tissue regeneration.

本文引用的文献

1
Macrophages are required to coordinate mouse digit tip regeneration.巨噬细胞是协调小鼠指尖再生所必需的。
Development. 2017 Nov 1;144(21):3907-3916. doi: 10.1242/dev.150086. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
2
The senescence-associated secretory phenotype induces cellular plasticity and tissue regeneration.衰老相关分泌表型诱导细胞可塑性和组织再生。
Genes Dev. 2017 Jan 15;31(2):172-183. doi: 10.1101/gad.290635.116. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
3
Injury-Induced Senescence Enables In Vivo Reprogramming in Skeletal Muscle.损伤诱导的衰老使骨骼肌体内重编程成为可能。
早期的胞葬作用引导巨噬细胞花生四烯酸代谢以促进组织再生。
Immunity. 2025 Feb 11;58(2):344-361.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2024.11.018.
4
Spiny mice (Acomys) have evolved cellular features to support regenerative healing.刺毛鼠(刚毛鼠属)已经进化出细胞特征以支持再生性愈合。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2025 Feb;1544(1):5-26. doi: 10.1111/nyas.15281. Epub 2025 Jan 13.
5
Distinct Hemostasis and Blood Composition in Spiny Mouse .刺毛鼠独特的止血与血液成分
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Nov 29;25(23):12867. doi: 10.3390/ijms252312867.
6
Tail Tales: What We Have Learned About Regeneration from Xenopus Laevis Tadpoles.尾巴的故事:我们从非洲爪蟾蝌蚪身上学到的再生知识。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Oct 29;25(21):11597. doi: 10.3390/ijms252111597.
7
Apoptotic extracellular vesicles carrying Mif regulate macrophage recruitment and compensatory proliferation in neighboring epithelial stem cells during tissue maintenance.凋亡细胞外囊泡携带 Mif 调节组织维持过程中邻近上皮干细胞中巨噬细胞的募集和代偿性增殖。
PLoS Biol. 2024 Nov 4;22(11):e3002194. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002194. eCollection 2024 Nov.
8
Spiny mice are primed but fail to regenerate volumetric skeletal muscle loss injuries.刺鼠有再生潜能,但无法修复体积性骨骼肌损失损伤。
Skelet Muscle. 2024 Oct 29;14(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13395-024-00358-y.
9
Older spiny mice (Acomys cahirinus) have delayed and spatially heterogenous ear wound regeneration.老年刺毛鼠(Acomys cahirinus)的耳朵创伤再生具有延迟性和空间异质性。
Biol Open. 2024 Jul 15;13(10). doi: 10.1242/bio.060565. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
10
Hallmarks of regeneration.再生的特征。
Cell Stem Cell. 2024 Sep 5;31(9):1244-1261. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2024.07.007. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
Cell Stem Cell. 2017 Mar 2;20(3):407-414.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2016.11.020. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
4
Intra-amniotic LPS causes acute neuroinflammation in preterm rhesus macaques.羊膜腔内注射脂多糖可导致早产恒河猴急性神经炎症。
J Neuroinflammation. 2016 Sep 6;13(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12974-016-0706-4.
5
Ear wound regeneration in the African spiny mouse Acomys cahirinus.非洲刺毛鼠(Acomys cahirinus)耳部伤口的再生
Regeneration (Oxf). 2016 Mar 9;3(1):52-61. doi: 10.1002/reg2.50. eCollection 2016 Feb.
6
Effects of Macrophage Depletion on Sleep in Mice.巨噬细胞耗竭对小鼠睡眠的影响。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 21;11(7):e0159812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159812. eCollection 2016.
7
Highly Dynamic Transcriptional Signature of Distinct Macrophage Subsets during Sterile Inflammation, Resolution, and Tissue Repair.无菌性炎症、消退和组织修复过程中不同巨噬细胞亚群的高度动态转录特征
J Immunol. 2016 Jun 1;196(11):4771-82. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1502490. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
8
Comparative analysis of ear-hole closure identifies epimorphic regeneration as a discrete trait in mammals.耳孔封闭的比较分析表明,后生性再生是哺乳动物的一个离散特征。
Nat Commun. 2016 Apr 25;7:11164. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11164.
9
Inflammation and immunity in organ regeneration.器官再生中的炎症与免疫
Dev Comp Immunol. 2017 Jan;66:98-110. doi: 10.1016/j.dci.2016.02.015. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
10
Naturally occurring p16(Ink4a)-positive cells shorten healthy lifespan.天然存在的p16(Ink4a)阳性细胞会缩短健康寿命。
Nature. 2016 Feb 11;530(7589):184-9. doi: 10.1038/nature16932. Epub 2016 Feb 3.