Institute for Pharmacy, Freie Universität Berlin , Königin-Luise-Str. 2-4, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
Multifunctional Biomaterials for Medicine, Helmholtz Virtual Institute , Kantstr. 55, 14513 Teltow, Germany.
Biomacromolecules. 2017 Jun 12;18(6):1762-1771. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.7b00158. Epub 2017 May 26.
The adsorption of biomolecules to the surface of nanoparticles (NPs) following administration into biological environments is widely recognized. In particular, the "protein corona" is well understood in terms of formation kinetics and impact upon the biological interactions of NPs. Its presence is an essential consideration in the design of therapeutic NPs. In the present study, the protein coronas of six polymeric nanoparticles of prospective therapeutic use were investigated. These included three colloidal NPs-soft core-multishell (CMS) NPs, plus solid cationic Eudragit RS (EGRS), and anionic ethyl cellulose (EC) nanoparticles-and three nanogels (NGs)-thermoresponsive dendritic-polyglycerol (dPG) nanogels (NGs) and two amino-functionalized dPG-NGs. Following incubation with human plasma, protein coronas were characterized and their biological interactions compared with pristine NPs. All NPs demonstrated protein adsorption and increased hydrodynamic diameters, although the solid EGRS and EC NPs bound notably more protein than the other tested particles. Shifts toward moderately negative surface charges were also observed for all corona bearing NPs, despite varied zeta potentials in their pristine states. While the uptake and cellular adhesion of the colloidal NPs in primary human keratinocytes and human umbilical vein endothelial cells were significantly decreased when bearing the protein corona, no obvious impact was seen in the NGs. By contrast, corona bearing NGs induced marked increases in cytokine release from primary human macrophages not seen with corona bearing colloidal NPs. Despite this, no apparent enhancement to in vitro toxicity was noted. Finally, drug release from EGRS and EC NPs was assessed, where a decrease was seen in the EGRS NPs alone. Together these results provide a direct comparison of the physical and biological impact the protein corona has on NPs of widely varied character and in particular highlights a distinction between the corona's effects on NGs and colloidal NPs.
纳米粒子(NPs)进入生物环境后,生物分子被吸附到其表面,这一现象已得到广泛认可。特别是,人们已经很好地理解了“蛋白冠”的形成动力学及其对 NPs 生物相互作用的影响。在治疗性 NPs 的设计中,其存在是一个必不可少的考虑因素。在本研究中,研究了六种潜在治疗用途的聚合物纳米粒子的蛋白冠。这些包括三种胶体 NPs-软核-多壳(CMS) NPs,外加固体阳离子 Eudragit RS(EGRS)和阴离子乙基纤维素(EC)纳米粒子,以及三种纳米凝胶(NGs)-热敏树枝状多甘油(dPG)纳米凝胶(NGs)和两种氨基功能化的 dPG-NGs。与人类血浆孵育后,对蛋白冠进行了表征,并比较了它们与原始 NPs 的生物相互作用。所有 NPs 都表现出蛋白质吸附和水动力直径增加,尽管与其他测试粒子相比,固体 EGRS 和 EC NPs 结合的蛋白质明显更多。尽管原始状态下的 ζ 电位不同,但所有带蛋白冠的 NPs 的表面电荷也都向中等负电荷转移。尽管胶体 NPs 在原代人角质形成细胞和人脐静脉内皮细胞中的摄取和细胞黏附明显减少,但在 NGs 中没有观察到明显影响。相比之下,带蛋白冠的 NGs 诱导原代人巨噬细胞释放明显增加的细胞因子,而带蛋白冠的胶体 NPs 则没有这种情况。尽管如此,未观察到明显增强体外毒性。最后,评估了 EGRS 和 EC NPs 的药物释放情况,仅 EGRS NPs 的释放减少。总之,这些结果直接比较了蛋白冠对具有广泛不同特性的 NPs 的物理和生物影响,特别是突出了蛋白冠对 NGs 和胶体 NPs 的影响之间的区别。
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020-6
Int J Nanomedicine. 2019-9-26
Int J Nanomedicine. 2014-12-18
Nanoscale Adv. 2025-8-8
Materials (Basel). 2023-9-30