Suppr超能文献

评估乳腺癌危险因素揭示了亚型异质性。

Assessment of Breast Cancer Risk Factors Reveals Subtype Heterogeneity.

机构信息

Department of Medical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.

Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Cancer Res. 2017 Jul 1;77(13):3708-3717. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-2574. Epub 2017 May 16.

Abstract

Subtype heterogeneity for breast cancer risk factors has been suspected, potentially reflecting etiologic differences and implicating risk prediction. However, reports are conflicting regarding the presence of heterogeneity for many exposures. To examine subtype heterogeneity across known breast cancer risk factors, we conducted a case-control analysis of 2,632 breast cancers and 15,945 controls in Sweden. Molecular subtype was predicted from pathology record-derived IHC markers by a classifier trained on PAM50 subtyping. Multinomial logistic regression estimated separate ORs for each subtype by the exposures parity, age at first birth, breastfeeding, menarche, hormone replacement therapy use, somatotype at age 18, benign breast disease, mammographic density, polygenic risk score, family history of breast cancer, and BRCA mutations. We found clear subtype heterogeneity for genetic factors and breastfeeding. Polygenic risk score was associated with all subtypes except for the basal-like ( < 0.0001). "Never breastfeeding" was associated with increased risk of basal-like subtype [OR 4.17; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.89-9.21] compared with both nulliparity (reference) and breastfeeding. Breastfeeding was not associated with risk of HER2-overexpressing type, but protective for all other subtypes. The observed heterogeneity in risk of distinct breast cancer subtypes for germline variants supports heterogeneity in etiology and has implications for their use in risk prediction. The association between basal-like subtype and breastfeeding merits more research into potential causal mechanisms and confounders. .

摘要

乳腺癌危险因素的亚型异质性一直受到怀疑,这可能反映了病因学的差异,并暗示了风险预测。然而,关于许多暴露因素是否存在异质性的报告存在冲突。为了研究已知乳腺癌危险因素的亚型异质性,我们在瑞典进行了一项 2632 例乳腺癌病例和 15945 例对照的病例对照分析。分子亚型通过基于 PAM50 分型的分类器从病理记录衍生的 IHC 标志物中预测。多变量逻辑回归根据暴露的奇偶性、初产年龄、母乳喂养、初潮年龄、激素替代疗法使用、18 岁时的体型、良性乳腺疾病、乳腺密度、多基因风险评分、乳腺癌家族史和 BRCA 突变,为每种亚型估计了单独的 OR。我们发现遗传因素和母乳喂养存在明显的亚型异质性。多基因风险评分与除基底样以外的所有亚型相关(<0.0001)。与 nulliparity(参考)和母乳喂养相比,“从不母乳喂养”与基底样亚型的风险增加相关[OR 4.17;95%置信区间(CI)1.89-9.21]。母乳喂养与 HER2 过表达型的风险无关,但对所有其他亚型均具有保护作用。不同乳腺癌亚型中与种系变异相关的风险的观察到的异质性支持病因学的异质性,并对其在风险预测中的应用具有影响。基底样亚型与母乳喂养之间的关联需要进一步研究潜在的因果机制和混杂因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验