Smadi Leena
Department of Conservative Dentistry, University of Jordan Amman, Jordan e-mail:
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 May 1;18(5):358-362. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2046.
The aims of this study were to investigate the prevalence of apical periodontitis (AP) in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients compared with nondiabetic patients and to examine the effect of glycemic control on the prevalence of AP.
Radiographs of a group of DM patients were compared with those of a matched nondiabetic group to identify AP. The diabetic group was subdivided according to the level of glycemic control into two subgroups: A well-controlled DM and a poorly controlled DM. The periapical index score was used to assess the periapical status. All groups were compared in regard to the presence of AP lesions, the number of end-odontically treated teeth (ET), and the percentage of failure of endodontically treated teeth (AP/ET ratio). Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS version 20.0, Chicago, Illinois, USA) was used for all the analyses; p ≤ 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
The prevalence of AP was higher in diabetic group than in the nondiabetic group (13.5 vs 11.9% respectively). Diabetic group had more teeth with endodontic treatment ET compared with nondiabetic group (4.18 vs 1.82% respectively); this difference was statistically significant (p = 0.001) along with higher AP/ET ratio (27.7 vs 19.3 respectively). The poorly controlled DM group had a higher prevalence of AP lesions compared with the well-controlled DM group (18.29 vs 9.21 respectively). This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.001); they also had a higher percentage of ET (5.55 vs 3.13% respectively) and AP/ ET ratio (32.0 vs 21.8% respectively).
This survey demonstrates a higher prevalence of AP in DM patients compared with nondiabetic group, with an increased prevalence of persistent chronic AP. Compared with a well-controlled diabetic group, a poor glycemic control may be associated with a higher prevalence of AP and increased rate of endodontic failures.
Counseling diabetic patients, particularly those with poor glycemic control, about the risk of failure of endodontic treatment can be part of planning management, which could include refereeing diabetic patients who need endodontic treatment for consultant care.
本研究旨在调查糖尿病(DM)患者与非糖尿病患者相比根尖周炎(AP)的患病率,并研究血糖控制对AP患病率的影响。
将一组DM患者的X光片与匹配的非糖尿病组的X光片进行比较,以确定AP。糖尿病组根据血糖控制水平分为两个亚组:血糖控制良好的DM组和血糖控制不佳的DM组。采用根尖指数评分来评估根尖周状况。比较所有组的AP病变情况、根管治疗牙齿(ET)的数量以及根管治疗失败牙齿的百分比(AP/ET比率)。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS 20.0版,美国伊利诺伊州芝加哥)进行所有分析;p≤0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
糖尿病组AP的患病率高于非糖尿病组(分别为13.5%和11.9%)。与非糖尿病组相比,糖尿病组接受根管治疗的牙齿更多(分别为4.18%和1.82%);这种差异具有统计学意义(p = 0.001),同时AP/ET比率也更高(分别为27.7和19.3)。血糖控制不佳的DM组与血糖控制良好的DM组相比,AP病变的患病率更高(分别为18.29%和9.21%)。这种差异具有统计学意义(p = 0.001);他们的ET百分比也更高(分别为5.55%和3.13%)以及AP/ET比率更高(分别为32.0和21.8%)。
本调查表明,与非糖尿病组相比,DM患者中AP的患病率更高,持续性慢性AP的患病率增加。与血糖控制良好的糖尿病组相比,血糖控制不佳可能与AP的患病率更高和根管治疗失败率增加有关。
向糖尿病患者,尤其是血糖控制不佳的患者咨询根管治疗失败的风险,可以作为治疗计划管理的一部分,这可能包括将需要根管治疗的糖尿病患者转诊至专科医生处。