Thiele G M, Woods G L
University of Nebraska Medical Center, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Omaha 68105-1065.
J Virol Methods. 1988 Dec;22(2-3):319-28. doi: 10.1016/0166-0934(88)90114-0.
With the development of both monoclonal antibodies to the immediate early nuclear antigen (EA) of cytomegalovirus (CMV) and different methods used for its detection, the time required for diagnosis of infection has become significantly shorter. However, discrepancies between tissue culture (TC) and the EA assay methods have raised questions concerning which method is more sensitive and whether a positive test result truly represents infection or latency. We have found that dexamethasone (Dex), when incorporated into the growth medium at a concentration of 10(-5) M, decreases the variability between the two techniques and increases the sensitivities of both TC and EA assay. However, for Dex to be effective, it was necessary to prepare, seed and grow the indicator cells in the presence of 10(-5) M Dex. Additionally, the cells had to be in contact with Dex for approximately 24 h before any effect was observed. Except for this step, all other procedures were the same as have been described elsewhere. In this study, four methods were compared: TC, TC with Dex (TC-D), EA, and EA with Dex (EA-D). Of 251 clinical specimens (200 microliter/well), 46 (18%) were positive for CMV. Of the 46, 30 (65%) were positive by TC, 39 (85%) by TC-D, 39 (85%) by EA, and 42 (91%) by EA-D. Without Dex the combination of TC plus EA detected only 41 of 46 (84%) positive samples. In contrast, the presence of Dex allowed detection of all 46 positive samples by TC-D and EA-D. Also, more fluorescent forming units (FFU) were detected by EA-D than EA (mean 14.8 FFU), and cytopathic effect was detected sooner (mean 9 days) by TC-D than by TC. Dex significantly increased the detection of CMV by TC (P less than 0.05). In addition, the use of any one of these methods alone did not effectively detect all positive samples. We suggest the combination of TC-D and EA-D for detection of all samples positive for CMV and to detect other viruses that may be missed by the EA method.
随着针对巨细胞病毒(CMV)即刻早期核抗原(EA)的单克隆抗体的研发以及用于其检测的不同方法的出现,感染诊断所需的时间已显著缩短。然而,组织培养(TC)与EA检测方法之间的差异引发了关于哪种方法更敏感以及阳性检测结果是否真的代表感染或潜伏的问题。我们发现,地塞米松(Dex)以10⁻⁵ M的浓度加入生长培养基中时,可减少两种技术之间的变异性,并提高TC和EA检测的灵敏度。然而,要使Dex有效,必须在10⁻⁵ M Dex存在的情况下制备、接种和培养指示细胞。此外,细胞必须与Dex接触约24小时才能观察到任何效果。除了这一步骤外,所有其他程序与其他地方描述的相同。在本研究中,比较了四种方法:TC、加Dex的TC(TC-D)、EA和加Dex的EA(EA-D)。在251份临床标本(200微升/孔)中,46份(18%)CMV呈阳性。在这46份中,30份(65%)通过TC呈阳性,39份(85%)通过TC-D呈阳性,39份(85%)通过EA呈阳性,42份(91%)通过EA-D呈阳性。没有Dex时,TC加EA的组合仅检测到46份阳性样本中的41份(84%)。相比之下,Dex的存在使TC-D和EA-D能够检测到所有46份阳性样本。此外,EA-D检测到的荧光形成单位(FFU)比EA多(平均14.8个FFU),TC-D检测到细胞病变效应的时间比TC早(平均9天)。Dex显著提高了TC对CMV的检测率(P小于0.05)。此外,单独使用这些方法中的任何一种都不能有效地检测到所有阳性样本。我们建议联合使用TC-D和EA-D来检测所有CMV阳性样本,并检测EA方法可能遗漏的其他病毒。